
Journal of Intelligent Sustainability and Decision Analytics (JISDA) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to analytical and model-based approaches to sustainability-oriented decision-making in complex systems, projects, and policy environments. The journal addresses sustainability challenges as structured decision problems characterised by multiple objectives, competing criteria, and uncertainty. It publishes research that develops, evaluates, and applies formal decision models and quantitative frameworks to support robust and transparent sustainability decisions. JISDA welcomes methodological and applied contributions in areas such as multi-criteria decision analysis, structured evaluation frameworks, optimisation-informed assessment, uncertainty modelling, robustness analysis, and data-informed analytical methods, provided that a clearly defined decision or evaluation structure is central to the study. Interdisciplinary research drawing on decision science, operations research, systems modelling, environmental and energy studies, and sustainability analysis is encouraged, where analytical rigour and methodological transparency remain primary. The journal is published quarterly by Acadlore, with issues released in March, June, September, and December.
Professional Editorial Standards - All submissions are evaluated through a standard peer-review process involving independent reviewers and editorial assessment before acceptance.
Efficient Publication - The journal follows a defined review, revision, and production workflow to support regular and predictable publication of accepted manuscripts.
Open Access - JISDA is an open-access journal. All published articles are made available online without subscription or access fees.
Journal of Intelligent Sustainability and Decision Analytics (JISDA) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to analytical and model-based approaches to sustainability-oriented decision-making in complex systems, projects, and policy environments. The journal addresses sustainability challenges as structured decision problems characterised by multiple objectives, competing criteria, and uncertainty. It publishes research that develops, evaluates, and applies formal decision models and quantitative frameworks to support robust and transparent sustainability decisions. JISDA welcomes methodological and applied contributions in areas such as multi-criteria decision analysis, structured evaluation frameworks, optimisation-informed assessment, uncertainty modelling, robustness analysis, and data-informed analytical methods, provided that a clearly defined decision or evaluation structure is central to the study. Interdisciplinary research drawing on decision science, operations research, systems modelling, environmental and energy studies, and sustainability analysis is encouraged, where analytical rigour and methodological transparency remain primary. The journal is published quarterly by Acadlore, with issues released in March, June, September, and December.
Professional Editorial Standards - All submissions are evaluated through a standard peer-review process involving independent reviewers and editorial assessment before acceptance.
Efficient Publication - The journal follows a defined review, revision, and production workflow to support regular and predictable publication of accepted manuscripts.
Open Access - JISDA is an open-access journal. All published articles are made available online without subscription or access fees.

Aims & Scope
Aims
Journal of Intelligent Sustainability and Decision Analytics (JISDA) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal publishing research on analytical and decision-oriented approaches that support sustainability-related decision-making in complex systems, projects, and policy contexts. The journal addresses sustainability challenges as structured decision problems characterised by multiple objectives, competing criteria, uncertainty, and incomplete information. It examines how such problems are analysed and resolved through formal decision models, quantitative frameworks, and systematic evaluation methods.
The journal emphasises methodological contributions that advance the design, validation, and critical examination of decision analytics and modelling frameworks in sustainability contexts. While sustainability assessment constitutes an important component of this domain, JISDA extends beyond assessment exercises to include decision support, optimisation-informed evaluation, structured comparison of alternatives, and analytical reasoning that clarifies how sustainability choices are constructed and justified.
Submissions are expected to demonstrate explicit modelling structures, transparent assumptions, and rigorous validation procedures. Descriptive or purely thematic discussions without a clearly defined decision or evaluation framework fall outside the scope of the journal. JISDA operates at the intersection of sustainability studies, decision science, systems analysis, optimisation, and quantitative modelling, maintaining a strong commitment to analytical rigour, transparency, and reproducibility.
The journal publishes conceptual, methodological, computational, and applied research that strengthens robust and accountable sustainability-related decision-making across engineering, management, environmental, infrastructure, energy, and policy domains. JISDA is published quarterly by Acadlore and adheres to established international standards of peer review and editorial governance.
Key features of JISDA include:
Sustainability-related decision-making and evaluation are treated as analytical and methodological problems rather than as purely thematic discussions.
Emphasis is placed on formal decision analytics, modelling structures, and evaluation logic supporting structured comparison, prioritisation, optimisation, and choice under uncertainty.
Particular attention is given to the construction and validation of evaluation frameworks, indicator systems, weighting mechanisms, and decision rules, as well as to their influence on analytical outcomes.
The journal encourages examination of robustness, structural sensitivity, transparency, and empirical validation in sustainability decision-support models.
Ethical, societal, and governance dimensions are considered where they are formally embedded within decision structures, criteria systems, or modelling assumptions.
Comparative and cross-method studies are welcomed where they clarify how alternative analytical approaches yield differing conclusions across systems or sectors.
Editorial evaluation prioritises methodological clarity, reproducibility, and transparent modelling assumptions.
Scope
JISDA welcomes original research articles, theoretical contributions, systematic reviews, and analytically grounded empirical or computational studies that advance structured understanding of sustainability-oriented decision-making. Submissions should maintain a clear focus on decision analytics, modelling frameworks, or formal evaluation methods applied to sustainability challenges. Topics include, but are not limited to:
Sustainability-Oriented Decision and Evaluation Frameworks
Design and structuring of criteria systems, indicator hierarchies, and evaluation logic
Comparative evaluation of sustainability alternatives across systems and spatial scales
Integrated environmental, economic, and social decision models
Representation of uncertainty, ambiguity, and subjective judgement in formal sustainability analysis
Development of structured evaluation architectures for long-term sustainability planning
Decision Analytics and Multi-Criteria Methods
Multi-criteria decision analysis (AHP, ANP, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE, ELECTRE and related approaches)
Hybrid decision-support frameworks integrating quantitative and expert-based inputs
Sensitivity, stability, and robustness analysis of decision outcomes
Group decision-making and stakeholder preference modelling
Optimisation-informed evaluation and structured trade-off analysis
Uncertainty and Advanced Modelling Approaches
Probabilistic, fuzzy, evidential, Bayesian, interval, and robust modelling techniques
Formal treatment of incomplete or imprecise information in sustainability evaluation
Data-informed analytical approaches supporting structured decision processes
Integration of decision models with simulation, optimisation, and scenario analysis
Model validation, interpretability, and reproducibility
Applications in Sustainability-Oriented Systems
Decision analytics for energy systems, renewable deployment, decarbonisation strategies, and transition planning
Evaluation of circular economy strategies, resource efficiency policies, and waste management systems
Sustainability decision models for industrial, urban, transportation, and infrastructure systems
Comparative analysis of land-use planning and infrastructure development options
Decision support for long-term system transformation and climate resilience strategies
ESG-integrated analytical models in supply chains and infrastructure systems
Evaluation and Methodological Reflection
Benchmarking and comparative analysis of sustainability decision methodologies
Validation and performance assessment of decision-support frameworks
Critical examination of modelling assumptions and analytical bias
Robustness, transparency, and reproducibility in sustainability decision analytics
Methodological implications for policy design and strategic planning
Related and Emerging Topics
Dynamic and longitudinal sustainability evaluation
Scenario-based and exploratory decision analytics
Integration of evaluation models with optimisation, simulation, and system dynamics
Structured analysis of trade-offs and synergies across sustainability dimensions
Scaling decision models across local, regional, national, and global contexts






