Efficient management of production processes in modern manufacturing depends on the timely identification of their most critical phases, as such recognition directly enhances process reliability, productivity, and product quality. To address this need, an objective multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) framework has been developed by integrating the Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method with Pareto analysis, a well-established approach also referred to as ABC classification. Within this framework, a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria was determined in collaboration with a Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) team from a Tier-1 automotive manufacturer. The decision matrix was constructed from data extracted from PFMEA reports that had been subjected to preliminary statistical processing to ensure robustness and comparability. The relative importance of the criteria was then established using the CRITIC method, which objectively derives weights from statistical indicators such as the arithmetic mean, standard deviation, and inter-criteria correlation coefficients. The framework was subsequently applied to the PFMEA report for a rear axle assembly process, encompassing 16 discrete production phases. Pareto analysis was employed to classify the phases according to their criticality, thereby enabling a systematic prioritization of process risks. The resulting classification demonstrated strong consistency with expert evaluations and was confirmed to reflect real-world production conditions accurately. Beyond confirming methodological validity, the findings underscore the advantages of employing a fully objective weighting mechanism combined with a widely recognized prioritization tool, thereby offering a transparent and replicable basis for decision-making in complex manufacturing contexts. This integration not only supports continuous improvement and risk mitigation but also provides a scalable framework applicable to a broad range of industrial processes where critical phase identification is essential.
The rapid urbanization and economic development in China have led to increasing demand for infrastructure systems such as utilities, water, gas, and communication networks, exacerbating urban challenges like land scarcity and congestion. Previous studies have highlighted the potential of underground space development as a means to address these issues. Underground utility tunnel construction has been identified as a key solution for efficient pipeline maintenance and the advancement of smart city initiatives. However, as the scale of such projects continues to grow, so does the associated risk. Traditional risk assessment frameworks have often overlooked the significance of intelligent operation and maintenance (O&M) in the context of the digital transformation of infrastructure. This study proposes an updated risk assessment approach that integrates smart O&M into the evaluation framework, reflecting the adoption of technologies such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), digital twins, and big data in construction processes. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), expert consultations, questionnaire surveys, and fuzzy evaluation methods are applied to identify and assess risks in an underground utility tunnel project in Q City. The results indicate that the overall risk level of the project is above average, with the most significant risks occurring during the construction and operational phases. Risk mitigation measures have been proposed for the identified high-risk areas, tailored to the specific characteristics of the project. This study underscores the importance of incorporating smart operation and information technology risks into traditional risk management frameworks. The findings emphasize the need for a paradigm shift in the risk management of underground utility tunnel projects, particularly in light of the ongoing digital transformation of infrastructure. Such an approach would enhance the safety and efficiency of project management across the entire life cycle of the tunnel system.
The rapid growth of global trade has heightened the importance of efficient container handling, environmentally responsible operations, and high-performing equipment selection in sustaining the competitiveness of modern supply chains. Container Freight Stations (CFS) serve as critical operational hubs where loading, unloading, inspection, and temporary storage activities are conducted, thereby requiring equipment capable of safely and efficiently handling heavy-tonnage cargo while aligning with green port transformation goals. Forklifts, which constitute one of the core equipment groups in CFS yards, differ significantly in terms of lifting capacity, power systems, maneuverability, hydraulic performance, ergonomics, and environmental impact, transforming forklift selection into a complex, multi-dimensional decision problem shaped by both technical and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)-oriented considerations. Incorrect equipment choices may lead to operational downtime, energy inefficiency, equipment failures, and occupational safety risks, particularly in operations involving loads exceeding 25 tons. To address these challenges, this study proposes a hybrid decision-making framework that integrates expert-driven fuzzy assessments with sustainability-based evaluation using the FF-Hamacher-MEREC-ARLON methodology. In the first stage, expert weights and criterion importance values were calculated through the FF-MEREC approach, while alternative forklifts were ranked using the FF-ARLON method in the second stage. Two sensitivity analysis scenarios were applied: one by modifying the tradeoff ratio within ARLON and the other by sequentially removing each criterion. In both scenarios, the fourth alternative consistently emerged as the most suitable option. Furthermore, comparative analyses using eight established MCDM techniques; ALWAS, AROMAN, ARTASI, MABAC, MARCOS, RAM, SAW, and WASPAS; demonstrated complete agreement with the proposed model, confirming the fourth alternative as the top-ranked choice. The findings highlight the robustness, reliability, and sustainability alignment of the proposed framework for high-stakes heavy-duty equipment selection in port-based logistics operations.
The Load Haul Dumper (LHD) is essential machinery utilized for moving ore in the underground mining industry, in order to fulfil production targets. In this connection, the efficiency of the equipment should be maintained at an ideal standard, to be accomplished by reducing unexpected failure of components or subsystems in this intricate system. Downtime analysis helped identify faulty components and subsystems, which require the development of complementary maintenance plans to facilitate the replacement or fixing of parts. Proper practices of maintenance management improve the performance of the equipment. In this research, the efficiency of the LHD machine was assessed through reliability methods. Initially, the assumption of independent and identical distribution (IID) for the data sets was validated using trend and serial correlation analyses. The statistical tests indicated that the data sets adhered to the IID assumption. Therefore, a renewal process method was utilized for additional examination. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was utilized to identify the most suitable distribution for the data sets. The theoretical probability distributions were estimated parametrically using the Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) approach. The dependability of each separate subsystem was determined using the optimal fit distribution. Based on the reliability outcomes, preventive maintenance (PM) time plans were created to reach the targeted 90% reliability. Different maintenance strategies, in addition, were suggested to the maintenance team to extend the lifespan of the machine.
Operations managers and engineers in the automotive industry confront the key challenge in ensuring the reliability of the manufacturing process. To accurately classify failure modes, this study proposed a novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model integrated with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets (SVNSs) for operations management to prioritize actions in eliminating failure modes that had the greatest impact on the concerned reliability. The identification and evaluation of failure modes were grounded in the conventional Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), while the relative importance of risk factors (RFs) was expressed through predefined linguistic terms modelled with the SVNSs. The assessment of these risk factors was formulated as a fuzzy group decision-making problem and the fuzzy weight vector was derived from the Order Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator. Failure rankings were conducted through a modified version of the Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) method; being tested and validated with real-world data from an automotive company, the proposed FMEA-ELECTRE model could inspire stakeholders in various industries to explore this scientific contribution further.
In an increasingly dynamic and complex industrial landscape, the continuous enhancement of organizational performance has emerged as a critical imperative. To this end, structured quality assessment frameworks, such as the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Excellence Model, have been widely adopted as integrative tools for diagnosing, monitoring, and improving business performance. Despite its comprehensive nature, the EFQM model often requires the incorporation of additional quantitative methods to refine the evaluation of the relative significance of its criteria. In this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, extended with triangular fuzzy numbers, has been employed to determine the weighted importance of the EFQM model's criteria under conditions of uncertainty and expert subjectivity. This fuzzy extension of AHP allows for a more nuanced capture of linguistic judgments, thereby enhancing the robustness of decision-making in ambiguous environments. Expert assessments were elicited through structured interviews with quality managers from three manufacturing companies, enabling the construction of pairwise comparison matrices for each criterion. These matrices were then aggregated and analyzed to derive consensus-based priority weights. The findings reveal significant variations in the perceived importance of enabler and result criteria, underscoring the context-dependent applicability of the EFQM model. Furthermore, the results offer a more granular understanding of the internal structure of the model, providing a foundation for its adaptive use in quality management systems across the manufacturing sector. The integration of fuzzy logic into the hierarchical decision-making process is demonstrated to yield improved precision and flexibility, making it a valuable methodological enhancement for organizations pursuing excellence under uncertainty. The proposed approach also contributes to the broader discourse on multi-criteria decision analysis in quality management by addressing limitations in conventional crisp AHP applications.
Inefficiencies in traditional spare parts management for aircraft maintenance—including excessive inventory costs, supply chain delays, and operational disruptions—have long hindered fleet readiness and increased maintenance expenditure. To address these challenges, an integrated, reliability-driven inventory optimization framework has been developed by leveraging predictive analytics, real-time sensor data, and emerging digital technologies. The proposed model is grounded in Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) principles and enhanced by Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and digital twin technologies. Through the deployment of advanced sensor networks, real-time performance data are continuously collected and analyzed to forecast component degradation and predict imminent failures. This enables the transition from time-based to condition-based maintenance scheduling. Predictive models, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and Random Forest classifiers, are employed to enhance the accuracy of failure prognostics and spare parts demand forecasting. The dynamic alignment of spare parts provisioning with actual equipment reliability has been shown to reduce overstocking and prevent critical shortages. A case study conducted within a commercial airline fleet demonstrated a 20% reduction in inventory-related costs and a 15% decrease in aircraft downtime. Furthermore, operational efficiency and safety were significantly improved by minimizing unscheduled maintenance events. The proposed framework not only supports predictive and prescriptive maintenance strategies but also establishes a replicable model for digital transformation in aviation logistics. By integrating real-time analytics with digital twin simulations, a data-centric paradigm is introduced for proactive maintenance decision-making. This advancement paves the way towards more sustainable, cost-effective, and resilient aviation operations, aligning with broader industry goals of environmental responsibility and performance optimization.
The problem of job scheduling in parallel machine environments, where both processing times and setup times are characterized by stochastic variability, has been investigated with a focus on enhancing the efficiency of resource allocation in complex production systems. Job scheduling, as a critical component of operations research and systems engineering, plays a vital role in the optimization of large-scale, flexible manufacturing and service environments. In this study, a stochastic scheduling model has been formulated to minimize the maximum completion time (denoted as $Ct_{\textit{max}}$), under the simultaneous influence of probabilistic job durations and setup times associated with tool preparation. The problem has been addressed using two prominent metaheuristic algorithms: Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Simulated Annealing (SA). These methods were selected due to their demonstrated capacity to navigate large, non-deterministic search spaces efficiently and their adaptability to multi-constraint scheduling problems. A comparative analysis has been conducted by applying both algorithms under identical initial conditions, with algorithmic performance evaluated in terms of solution quality, computational efficiency, and robustness to input variability. The model incorporates key practical considerations, including randomized setup times which are often neglected in conventional deterministic scheduling models, thereby improving its relevance to real-world industrial settings. The formulation of the problem allows for additional constraints and objectives to be flexibly integrated in future research, including resource conflicts, machine eligibility constraints, and energy-aware scheduling. Empirical results suggest that while both algorithms are effective in deriving near-optimal schedules, notable differences exist in convergence behavior and sensitivity to parameter tuning. The findings offer critical insights into the comparative strengths of GA and SA in managing the stochastic nature of parallel machine scheduling problems. By advancing a robust metaheuristic framework that accounts for real-world uncertainties, this study contributes to the ongoing development of intelligent scheduling systems in systems engineering, manufacturing logistics, and automated production planning.
In modern foundry operations, the reliability and operational continuity of sand molding systems are pivotal to maintaining productivity, safety, and competitive advantage. In this study, Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) has been employed to systematically evaluate and optimize the performance of a pneumatic molding cell utilized in the production of sand molds. Particular focus has been directed toward the pusher subsystem, which is frequently subjected to high mechanical loads and cyclic stress, rendering it susceptible to recurrent failures that compromise both uptime and process efficiency. Potential failure modes were exhaustively identified, categorized, and prioritized based on their severity, occurrence, and detectability. Critical components, including servo motors, pneumatic actuators, and gearbox assemblies, were found to pose substantial risk to system reliability due to wear-induced degradation, misalignment, and lubrication failure. For each high-priority failure mode, targeted mitigation strategies were proposed, encompassing enhanced condition monitoring, retrofitting of wear-resistant materials, and redesign of high-stress interfaces. Furthermore, failure detection mechanisms were improved through the integration of predictive maintenance protocols and sensor-based diagnostics. Implementation of these recommendations has resulted in measurable reductions in unplanned downtime, repair frequency, and maintenance overhead. This investigation demonstrates that FMECA, though underutilized in conventional foundry environments, offers a structured, data-driven methodology for uncovering latent failure risks and implementing preventive measures in complex industrial systems. By embedding FMECA within routine maintenance frameworks, a substantial improvement in operational resilience and equipment lifespan can be achieved. The findings support the strategic integration of reliability engineering methodologies into sand molding operations, contributing not only to cost efficiency but also to the broader adoption of systematic risk management practices in process-driven manufacturing sectors.
A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted to investigate the causes and prioritization of failure modes within a production line manufacturing leather covers for automotive interiors. The study was grounded in a Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA), with a dual emphasis on evaluating the traditional Risk Priority Number (RPN) approach and the more contemporary Action Priority (AP) methodology, which has been increasingly adopted to enhance risk assessment sensitivity. Failure modes were classified and prioritized using both approaches, revealing notable differences in the ranking outcomes. To further elucidate the underlying contributors to these failure modes, causal factors were systematically categorized in accordance with the 5M+1E framework—Man, Machine, Method, Material, Measurement, and Environment—commonly employed in quality and reliability engineering. A cause-and-effect diagram was constructed to visualize the distribution of root causes across these categories. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were employed to quantify the relationship between each category and the prioritized failure modes. Particular attention was paid to examining the interdependencies among the core PFMEA parameters—Severity, Occurrence, and Detection—in order to determine their respective contributions to the variability in failure mode rankings. It was found that Severity exerted the most substantial influence on the prioritization outcomes under the AP model, while Occurrence was more dominant when the RPN method was applied. These findings suggest that the choice of prioritization method significantly alters the interpretation of risk and resource allocation for corrective actions. The integration of 5M+1E categorization with PFMEA metrics offers a structured pathway to enhance the diagnostic capability of reliability assessments and improve decision-making in failure prevention strategies. This approach is proposed as a more robust alternative to traditional analysis, enabling more precise targeting of corrective and preventive measures in high-precision manufacturing environments.
Wireless communication technology has transformed connectivity across industries, but its widespread adoption comes with significant challenges. The purpose of paper is to identify and analyze the most critical obstacles affecting the efficiency, reliability, and scalability of wireless communication systems. This research paper mainly demonstrates to determine the most effective challenges for wireless communication technology. In recent times, it is really very significant and demanding work of this technology-based society. Interference, security vulnerabilities, bandwidth limitations, signal attenuation, and latency concerns etc. are the basic factors of this challenging work. This study explores the application of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques using intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs) to evaluate this. We apply the weighted MCDM method, i.e., Entropy in this paper. The decisions of multiple decision makers (DMs) are considered into account when collecting this problem related data and IFNs are utilised as mathematical tools to handle uncertainty. In order to address the ambiguity and inconsistency of the system, we finally conclude to conduct the analysis here with final result.