Javascript is required
1.
L. Zhang, “A changing pattern of regional CO₂ emissions in China,” Geogr. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2.
S. H. Deng, J. Zhang, F. Shen, H. Guo, Y. W. Li, and H. Xiao, “The relationship between industry structure, household-number and energy consumption in China,” Energy Sources Part B, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 325–333, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3.
L. W. Pan, J. J. Chen, Y. L. Zhao, B. Y. Xu, and T. C. Jiao, “Towards optimal customized electricity pricing via iterative two-layer optimization for consumers and prosumers,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 469, no. 267, p. 143208, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4.
X. Zou, X. Yang, and J. Jiang, “The influence of energy consumption structure adjustment on the upgrading of manufacturing structure—Empirical analysis based on manufacturing industry segments,” Soft Sci., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 45–53, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5.
Y. Zhou, Z. He, L. Ma, Y. Yang, T. Zhang, and L. Chen, “Spatial and temporal differentiation of China’s provincial scale energy consumption structure,” Resour. Sci., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2247–2257, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6.
Y. Han and L. Ma, “Effectiveness measurement of industrial structure transformation and upgrading in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,” J. Cap. Univ. Econ. Bus., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 45–55, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7.
S. Wang and W. Zhang, “Optimization of industrial structure based on goals of energy intensity and economic growth for Jing-Jin-Ji,” Forum Sci. Technol. China, vol. 2018, no. 7, pp. 88–96, 2018. [Google Scholar]
8.
Y. Bai, H. Zheng, Y. Shan, J. Meng, and Y. Li, “The consumptionbased carbon emissions in the JingJinJi Urban agglomeration over China’s economic transition,” Earth’s Future, vol. 9, no. 9, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9.
D. Wijesekara, P. Amarasinghe, A. Induranga, V. Vithanage, and K. R. Koswattage, “Energy, exergy, and environmental impact analysis and optimization of coal-biomass combustion combined cycle CHP systems,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 2363, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10.
M. Zhang, R. Liu, and H. Sun, “Achieving carbon-neutral economies through circular economy, digitalization, and energy transition,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, p. 13779, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11.
F. Niu, Z. Feng, and H. Liu, “Evaluation of resources environmental carrying capacity and its application in industrial restructuring in Tibet, China,” Acta Geogr. Sin., vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 1563–1575, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12.
Y. Zhao and Q. Wang, “Study on impacts of energy consumption and economic growth on carbon emissions in Jing-Jin-Ji area,” Energy China, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 34–40, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13.
J. Lan, A. Malik, M. Lenzen, D. McBain, and K. Kanemoto, “A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints,” Appl. Energy, vol. 163, pp. 436–451, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14.
S. S. Chopra and V. Khanna, “Understanding resilience in industrial symbiosis networks: Insights from network analysis,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 141, pp. 86–94, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15.
H. Lütkepohl, New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005. [Google Scholar]
16.
B. Lin and G. Zhang, “Can industrial restructuring significantly reduce energy consumption? Evidence from China,” Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, vol. 54, no. 5, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17.
J. Wu and X. Cui, “Industrial structure optimization and natural gas consumption in Jing-Jin-Ji: Based on VAR model,” Technoecon. Manag. Res., vol. 2021, no. 7, pp. 124–128, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18.
D. Gao, G. Kong, L. Ma, X. Yan, and H. Zhang, “Energy development status and developing focus of varied regions in China,” Chinese Eng. Sci., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19.
European Commission, “The Clean Industrial Revolution: A Competitiveness and Decarbonization Joint Roadmap,” 2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0085 [Google Scholar]
20.
J. Axenbeck, A. Berner, and T. Kneib, “What drives the relationship between digitalization and energy demand? Exploring heterogeneity in German manufacturing firms,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 369, p. 122317, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21.
L. Massé, “Why path dependence leads to a fossilized Alberta: regionalism and the climate transition in Canada,” Environ. Polit., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 882–902, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Search
Open Access
Research article

Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region

Zhanjun Qiao*
Emergency Equipment College, University of Emergency Management, 065201 Langfang, China
Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development
|
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2025
|
Pages 102-115
Received: 04-27-2025,
Revised: 06-09-2025,
Accepted: 06-23-2025,
Available online: 06-29-2025
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

This study constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework encompassing the ecological transformation of industrial structure, the degree of energy consumption structure optimization, and their respective evolutionary characteristics. Employing a vector autoregression (VAR) model, the paper systematically investigates the dynamic coupling relationship between industrial ecological evolution and energy structure optimization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region. The findings indicate that the region has experienced a sustained improvement in the ecological orientation of its industrial structure, alongside a significant degree of spatial interdependence. In the long term, industrial ecologization exerts a notable positive influence on the optimization of the local energy consumption structure. In the short term, energy structure optimization in Beijing and Tianjin generates effective feedback that further facilitates their own industrial ecological upgrading. Distinct differences are observed across the three sub-regions in terms of evolutionary pathways and adjustment mechanisms, highlighting the critical role of regional functional positioning in shaping the coupled evolution of the industrial–energy system. The study not only enriches the empirical understanding of ecological economic interactions at the regional scale, but also offers theoretical guidance and policy insights for advancing low-carbon, green, and coordinated development across the BTH region.
Keywords: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), Industrial structure, Ecologization, Energy consumption structure, VAR model

1. Introduction

The ecologization of industrial structure, grounded in ecological economics, refers to the restructuring and optimization of resource allocation and factor flows across industries in accordance with ecological development principles. The goal is to enhance production efficiency while ensuring the sustainable utilization of environmental and resource capacities, thereby supporting long-term, stable economic growth. The structure of energy consumption denotes the proportional composition of various energy types—such as coal, oil, natural gas, and electricity—within total energy usage. Industrial upgrading has the potential to steer energy consumption toward cleaner and more efficient configurations, while improvements in the energy consumption structure, in turn, provide critical support for further industrial transformation. The two systems are inherently interdependent and mutually reinforcing. As the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) regional integration strategy advances into a more substantive phase, accurately identifying the trajectory of industrial restructuring and facilitating the optimization of energy consumption has become essential. Such efforts are crucial for propelling the region toward deeper, higher-quality, and more sustainable collaborative development.

A considerable body of scholarship has explored the relationship between industrial transformation and energy consumption optimization. Domestically, Zhang [1] developed an "industry–energy" interaction model to examine the spatial distribution of carbon emissions in China, revealing that the evolution and diversification of industrial structures significantly shape the layout and growth dynamics of regional energy consumption. The studies [2], [3] provided empirical evidence that industrial structure is a key driver of changes in energy consumption patterns. Zou et al. [4] further elucidated the mechanism through which industrial structure influences energy systems, highlighting the positive impacts of both structural rationalization and sophistication at the national level. Zhou et al. [5] identified a significant degree of spatial correlation in regional energy consumption structures. Focusing on the BTH region, Han and Ma [6] constructed a novel set of indicators based on rationalization and sophistication dimensions to evaluate the progress of industrial restructuring. Their findings suggest that Beijing's structural transformation outpaces that of Tianjin and Hebei. Wang and Zhang [7] observed that changes in the shares of the primary and secondary sectors have hindered reductions in energy intensity, while expansion of the tertiary sector plays a facilitative role; they thus advocate the development of green agriculture and strategic emerging industries. Bai et al. [8], based on empirical analysis of data from 2000 to 2011, found that industrial structure is a major determinant of energy consumption in the BTH region. On the international front, scholarly perspectives have expanded beyond traditional concerns with economic efficiency to encompass ecological efficiency, integrating environmental impacts and resource constraints. There is also growing attention to the role of digital platforms in enhancing the coordination and efficiency of industry–energy systems [9], [10]. Methodologically, industrial ecology provides a foundational framework for analyzing material and energy flows within industrial systems [11], [12], while advanced econometric models are increasingly employed to investigate complex system dynamics [13], [14].

Despite these advancements, several gaps remain. First, most existing studies emphasize either "sophistication" (such as increasing the proportion of the tertiary sector) or "rationalization" (coordination and balance among sectors), while largely overlooking "ecologization" as a comprehensive core dimension. In contrast to output-focused approaches, the concept of ecologization incorporates environmental constraints and sustainability imperatives, offering a more holistic lens for examining structural transformation. Second, the majority of prior studies adopt national-level or static comparative frameworks, which limit the ability to uncover dynamic evolutionary processes and spatial heterogeneity within functionally differentiated regions like BTH. Third, from a methodological perspective, prior research tends to focus on unidirectional causality or static correlations, lacking robust investigation into the dynamic, bidirectional feedback mechanisms between industrial ecologization and energy consumption structure optimization—particularly those based on time-series modeling.

In response to these shortcomings, this study adopts an integrative ecological perspective to construct a multidimensional indicator system for measuring industrial structure ecologization, encompassing dimensions such as resource consumption, environmental pressure, and ecological performance—thus addressing the limitations of economic-centric approaches. A VAR model is employed to capture the dynamic, bidirectional interactions between industrial ecologization and energy consumption structure optimization in the BTH region. Impulse response functions (IRF) and variance decomposition techniques are used to identify the pathways and intensities of interdependence. Furthermore, the distinct evolutionary patterns observed across BTH are analyzed to reveal how differentiated functional roles under a coordinated development framework shape unique trajectories in industry–energy coupling. The findings provide both empirical insights and theoretical foundations for formulating region-specific policies aimed at advancing a green, low-carbon, and synergistically integrated development model.

2. Framework for Assessing the Ecologization of Industrial Structure

Based on ensuring data accessibility and completeness, and in line with regional output efficiency and the goal of sustainable environmental resource utilization, this study extends traditional measures of industrial structure—namely rationalization and sophistication—by incorporating a sustainability dimension that accounts for energy consumption and pollutant emissions. Based on this framework, a composite index of industrial structure ecologization is developed from three interrelated dimensions: rationalization, sophistication, and sustainability. This integrated index is designed to comprehensively capture the multifaceted characteristics of industrial structure optimization. A non-parametric geometric aggregation method is adopted to measure the ecologization level of the industrial structure across BTH.

2.1 Rationalization Index

The rationalization of industrial structure reflects the degree to which factor inputs are efficiently allocated across industries, i.e., whether the distribution and utilization of resources among different sectors approach an optimal state. Drawing upon the concept of industrial structure deviation [1], this study constructs a rationalization indicator $H_{t}$ that accounts for the proportion of different industries comprehensively in the regional economy:

$H_{t}=\frac{1}{\sum_i^n y_i\left(\frac{y_i}{l_i}-1\right)}$
(1)

where, $H_{t}$ denotes the rationalization level of the industrial structure in period $t$, $y_i$ represents the output share of sector $i$ and $l_i$ denotes the employment share of the same sector. A smaller value of this index implies a higher degree of rationalization, indicating better alignment between resource input and output across sectors.

2.2 Upgrading Index

With the rapid advancement of information technologies, the shift toward a service-oriented economy has become a hallmark of industrial upgrading. The sophistication of industrial structure captures the extent to which an economy transitions from primary to secondary and tertiary industries. Following standard methodologies for measuring industrial advancement [16], the sophistication indicator $W_{t}$ is constructed as follows:

$W_t=\frac{v_3}{v_1}+\frac{v_3}{v_2}$
(2)

where, $W_t$ represents the sophistication level in period $t ; v_i$ denotes the GDP share of the primary ($i=1$), secondary ($i=2$), and tertiary ($i=3$) industries, respectively. A higher value of this index indicates greater industrial sophistication and a more advanced structural composition.

2.3 Sustainability Index

Regional economies can enhance sustainability by phasing out high-energy, high-emission industries and fostering low-consumption, low-emission sectors through innovation, technological progress, and rational resource allocation. Drawing on the relative potential evaluation model [17], two core indicators are selected: (1) energy intensity ($E_q$), which measures coal, oil, and natural gas consumption per unit of GDP; and (2) pollution intensity ($P_z$), which reflects the volume of wastewater, gas emissions, and solid industrial waste per unit of GDP. The sustainability indicator $M_t$ is constructed as:

$M_t=\frac{1}{2}\left(\sum_{q=1}^3 \frac{E^*-E_q}{E^*}+\sum_{z=1}^3 \frac{P^*-P_z}{P^*}\right)$
(3)

where, $M_t$ denotes the level of industrial structure sustainability in region during period $t$; $E^*$ and $P^*$ are the regional average energy and pollution intensities, respectively. This indicator is inversely related to the level of industrial structure sustainability.

2.4 Composite Ecologization Index

This study conceptualizes industrial structure ecologization from the perspective of the “three transformations”—rationalization, sophistication, and sustainability. Accordingly, a geometric aggregation method is employed to integrate these three core dimensions into a composite index, denoted as $S_t$, for measuring the overall level of industrial structure ecologization.

$S_t=H_t+W_t+M_t$
(4)

where, the index $S_t$ represents the degree of industrial structure ecologization in a given region during period $t$, serving as a comprehensive and intuitive metric for assessing both the effectiveness and differences in industrial structure optimization across BTH. Based on quarterly statistical data from 2001 to 2024, the $S_t$ values for the three regions were calculated using Eq. (4), and the resulting trends are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Industrial structure ecologization levels in the BTH region

3. Energy Structure Indicators

Given the spatial interdependence and coordinated dynamics across the BTH region, ecological adjustments in the regional industrial structure are expected to directly promote the optimization and upgrading of the energy consumption structure in neighboring areas. The BTH Coordinated Development Plan explicitly calls for a substantial increase in the share of clean energy and the establishment of a green, low-carbon energy supply system dominated by electricity and natural gas, with supplemental contributions from solar, geothermal, and biomass energy. The plan emphasizes principles of low-carbon development, energy efficiency, and technological advancement to guide the optimization of energy consumption patterns. Statistical data indicate that, alongside notable shifts in industrial structure, the share of coal consumption has decreased significantly in both Beijing and Tianjin. Meanwhile, the consumption shares of petroleum and natural gas have stabilized across all three regions, and the shares of electricity and other green energy sources have increased markedly—especially in Beijing and, to a lesser extent, Tianjin. This ongoing structural evolution has also been accompanied by continuous improvements in air quality, reflecting steady progress toward a cleaner and more efficient energy mix. Based on these trends, energy consumption in this study is categorized into three groups: coal ($E_c$), petroleum and natural gas ($E_{o g}$), and electricity plus other green energy sources ($E_p$), and the weights are assigned based on the ecological desirability of each energy source, with higher weights given to cleaner sources. Drawing upon quarterly energy consumption data from the China Energy Statistical Yearbook spanning 2001 to 2024, the study aggregates and standardizes regional statistics. Following the methodology used to construct the industrial sophistication indicator, a composite index is developed to represent regional energy consumption structure optimization:

$E_t=\frac{E_{o g t}}{E_{c t}+E_{o g t}}+\frac{E_{p t}}{E_{o g t}+E_{p t}}$
(5)

where, $E_t$ denotes the degree of energy consumption structure optimization in region during period $t$; $E_{c t}$, $E_{o g t}$, and $E_{p t}$ respectively represent the proportions of coal, petroleum and natural gas, and electricity plus other green energy sources in total energy consumption. A higher value of $E_t$ thus reflects a more optimized and sustainable energy consumption structure.

Quarterly data from 2001 to 2024 were used to calculate the $E_t$ values for BTH according to Eq. (5), and the resulting time series are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Energy consumption structure optimization index in the BTH region

The data reveal that all three regions have experienced a gradual decline in coal consumption shares, while the share of fossil fuels (petroleum and natural gas) has stabilized. In contrast, the proportion of electricity and other green energy has increased, though with marked regional variation: Beijing has exhibited the most significant upward trend, followed by Tianjin, with Hebei showing only a modest increase. To further capture the differential efficiency of energy consumption structure improvement—driven by variations in industrial ecologization levels across regions—this study introduces an additional indicator $E_t$, the Energy Consumption Structure Optimization Evolution Index, denoted as $R_t$:

$R_t=E_t * E_{p t}$
(6)

The $R_t$ index serves to characterize regional disparities in energy optimization performance that are attributable to differences in industrial structure ecologization. It reflects the extent to which improvements in industrial ecological structure translate into actual gains in energy structure optimization.

4. Empirical Analysis

4.1 Model and Variables

The VAR model, a non-structural system of equations, does not require any a priori restrictions on the endogenous variables. It is primarily used to estimate the dynamic relationships among jointly endogenous variables and to analyze the responses of the system to stochastic shocks, thereby enabling the interpretation of how various economic disturbances affect key variables over time [18]. The VAR model is particularly suitable for capturing short- and long-term dynamic interactions among interrelated variables, offering robust empirical support for hypothesis testing and policy inference. The standard VAR(p) model can be expressed as:

$y_s=\varphi_1 y_{s-1}+\varphi_2 y_{s-2}+\cdots+\varphi_p y_{s-p}+H x_s+\mu_s \quad(s=1,2, \cdots n)$
(7)

where, $y_s$ is a $k$-dimensional vector of endogenous variables; $x_s$ is a $\sigma$-dimensional vector of exogenous variables; $p$ denotes the number of lags; and $s$ is the number of samples. The matrices $\varphi_1, \ldots \varphi_p$, of dimension $k \times k$, and the matrix $H$ of dimension $k \times d$, represent the coefficients to be estimated. The vector $\mu_s$ is a $k$-dimensional error term capturing the residuals of the system.

This study adopts the VAR framework to uncover the intrinsic dynamic relationships between industrial structure ecologization and energy consumption structure optimization in the BTH region. To maintain model parsimony and concentrate on the core research objective, potential exogenous variables—such as policy factors and technological innovation—are not included in the VAR system. Instead, the model focuses exclusively on key endogenous variables that directly represent the core dynamics of the system. The first variable, industrial structure ecologization, captures a region’s transition toward a greener, low-carbon, and circular economy by integrating three core dimensions: resource use efficiency (rationalization), industrial upgrading (sophistication), and environmental performance (sustainability). This composite indicator goes beyond conventional measures of structural advancement by incorporating principles from ecological economics and industrial ecology to assess the sustainability of the industrial system [19], [20]. The second variable, energy consumption structure optimization, is a composite index based on the relative shares of three major energy categories. It is designed to reflect how structural changes in industry influence the composition and quality of energy demand. As an intermediate variable linking industrial transformation to environmental outcomes such as carbon emissions and pollution levels, this index provides a direct measure of energy system optimization. The third variable, energy consumption structure optimization evolution, captures the marginal rate of improvement in energy consumption structure as driven by changes in industrial ecologization. In other words, it quantifies the efficiency of optimization—i.e., how effectively shifts in industrial structure translate into progress in energy system reform. This indicator not only reflects the static level of optimization but also reveals the system’s dynamic capacity to evolve, offering deeper insights into the strength of industrial transformation as a driver of energy transition [21].

Together, these three variables form a logical and empirically tractable chain:

• Industrial ecologization transformation (driver).

• Energy consumption structure optimization (static outcome).

• Optimization evolution (dynamic efficiency).

• This chain captures the internal mechanisms of their coordinated evolution.

Accordingly, to investigate the dynamic evolutionary relationships and underlying mechanisms, this study constructs a three-variable VAR model using quarterly data for BTH from 2001 to 2024. The three core variables include the industrial structure ecologization index ($S_t$), the energy consumption structure optimization index ($E_t$), and the energy consumption optimization evolution index $\left(R_t\right)$. All data are drawn from the Beijing Statistical Yearbook, Tianjin Statistical Yearbook, Hebei Statistical Yearbook, and the China Statistical Yearbook. To eliminate potential heteroscedasticity in the time series, all variables are transformed using natural logarithms. The log-transformed variables are denoted as $L n S_t, L n E_t$ and $L n R_t$, respectively. The revised VAR model incorporating these three variables is specified as:

$Y_t=\mu+\phi_1 Y_{t-1}+\phi_2 Y_{t-2}+\cdots+\phi_k Y_{t-k}+\varepsilon_t$
(8)

where, specifically, let $Y_t=\left({Ln} S_t, {Ln} E_t, {Ln} R_t\right), \mu=\left(\mu_1, \mu_2, \mu_3\right)$, and assume that $\varepsilon_t$ is a white noise process, i.e., $E\left(\varepsilon_t\right)=0$.

4.2 Empirical Results
4.2.1 Unit root test

To avoid spurious regression results caused by non-stationary time series, the Augmented DickeyFuller (ADF) test is employed to assess the stationarity of the time series data for the BTH region. The ADF test is first applied to the level series of the three variables (denoted as $L n S_t, L n E_t$ and $L n R_t$). As shown in Table 1, the test statistics for all three variables are greater than their respective critical values at the 1% significance level, indicating the presence of unit roots-that is, the original series are non-stationary. Subsequently, the first-differenced series (denoted as $D L n S_t, D L n E_t$ and $D L n R_t$) are subjected to ADF tests. The results demonstrate that all three differenced variables pass the stationarity test at the 1% significance level. Moreover, the P -values associated with each variable are below the 0.05 threshold, confirming that the first-differenced series are stationary. These findings indicate that the original time series are integrated of order one, i.e., ${{\mathrm{I}}}(1)$.

Based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Schwarz Criterion (SC), all three variables for the BTH region are identified as integrated of order one, i.e., ${{\mathrm{I}}}(1)$. Accordingly, the first-differenced series of these variables are used to conduct the Johansen cointegration test and to establish the subsequent VAR model.

Table 1. Results of ADF unit root tests for variables in the BTH region

Region

Variable

Log-Level Series

First-Difference Series

ADF Statistic

P-Value

Conclusion

ADF Statistic

P-Value

Conclusion

Beijing

$S_t$

-1.85114

0.6714

Non-stationary

-4.6987

0.0014

Stationary

$E_t$

-1.2738

0.8881

Non-stationary

-3.1433

0.0007

Stationary

$R_t$

-2.8300

0.1906

Non-stationary

-11.6712

0.0000

Stationary

Tianjin

$S_t$

0.7178

0.9920

Non-stationary

-9.5996

0.0000

Stationary

$E_t$

-2.9055

0.1657

Non-stationary

-12.7530

0.0000

Stationary

$R_t$

-12.3658

0.0000

Non-stationary

-12.3658

0.0000

Stationary

Hebei

$S_t$

-2.9571

0.1501

Non-stationary

-2.8588

0.0008

Stationary

$E_t$

-3.1962

0.0917

Non-stationary

-9.9755

0.0000

Stationary

$R_t$

-2.9063

0.1655

Non-stationary

-11.2478

0.0000

Stationary

4.2.2 Johansen cointegration and granger causality tests

Given that all variables are confirmed to be integrated of order one based on the ADF unit root tests, the optimal lag length for Model (8) is determined using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) [12]. At the selected lag order, the Johansen cointegration test is employed to examine whether a long-run equilibrium relationship exists among the selected variables.

(1) Cointegration Test for Industrial Structure Ecologization Indicators in BTH

Given the spatial correlation and interconnectivity across the BTH region—and in light of the ongoing coordinated development strategy and long-term policy efforts such as the relocation of non-capital functions—this section begins by testing the industrial structure ecologization indicators for the three regions as endogenous variables.

Table 2. Results of the Johansen cointegration test

Null Hypothesis

Eigenvalue

Trace Statistic

5% Critical Value

P-Value

None *

0.3420

74.3080

29.7970

0.0000

At most 1 *

0.2110

35.7893

15.4947

0.0000

At most 2 *

0.1410

13.9828

3.8414

0.0002

Note: *denotes rejection of the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.
Figure 3. AR root stability test for the VAR(5) model

Based on AIC results, the optimal lag length for the cointegration test is set to 5. The Johansen test results in Table 2 show that at the 5% significance level for $L n S_t$ of the BTH region, the trace statistics for the three variables exceed the critical values, rejecting the null hypothesis of no cointegration. Specifically, the results support the existence of three cointegrating relationships. This indicates that the ecologization of industrial structures in BTH share a stable long-term equilibrium relationship, underscoring the strong interdependence of their structural transformation processes.

The results of the AR root test for the VAR(5) model are shown in Figure 3. All characteristic roots lie within the unit circle, indicating that the model satisfies the condition of stability.

The Granger causality results in Table 3 reveal that industrial structure ecologization in Beijing Granger-causes corresponding changes in both Tianjin and Hebei, while the reverse is not true—ecologization efforts in Tianjin and Hebei do not Granger-cause changes in Beijing. Additionally, Tianjin exerts a unidirectional Granger causal effect on Hebei, but not vice versa. These findings underscore the asymmetric influence of regional structural transformation, with Beijing acting as the leading driver in the ecologization process across the BTH region.

Table 3. Granger causality test results for industrial structure ecologization in BTH

Null Hypothesis

F-Statistic

P-Value

Conclusion

$S_{\text {TJt}}$ does not granger-cause $S_{\text {BJt}}$

8.2713

0.0160

Accepted

$S_{\text {HBt}}$ does not granger-cause $S_{\text {BJt}}$

1.1472

0.0007

Accepted

$S_{\text {BJt}}$ does not granger-cause $S_{\text {TJt}}$

0.6284

0.7304

Rejected

$S_{\text {HBt}}$ does not granger-cause $S_{\text {TJt}}$

15.6457

0.0004

Accepted

$S_{\text {BJt}}$ does not granger-cause $S_{\text {HBt}}$

0.1302

0.9370

Rejected

$S_{\text {TJt}}$ does not granger-cause $S_{\text {HBt}}$

2.0221

0.3638

Rejected

Note: Variables are denoted as follows: $S_{\text {BJt}}$-Beijing, $S_{\text {TJt}}$-Tianjin, $S_{\text {HBt}}$-Hebei.

(2) Regional-Level Variable Testing

In parallel, the Johansen cointegration test is conducted separately for each of the three regions using their respective indicator variables: $L n S_t, L n E_t$ and $L n R_\gamma$. Based on AIC values, the optimal lag lengths for the cointegration test are determined to be 4, 3, and 4 for BTH, respectively. The results, as shown in Table 4, indicate that for all three regions, the null hypothesis of no cointegration can be rejected at the 5% significance level. Specifically, each region exhibits three cointegrating vectors, thereby confirming the existence of long-run equilibrium relationships among the three variables in each region.

Table 4. Johansen cointegration test results by region

Region

Null Hypothesis

Eigenvalue

Trace Statistic

5% Critical Value

P-Value

Beijing

None

0.2742

55.7650

29.7970

0.0000

At most 1

0.2129

22.2815

15.4947

0.0008

At most 2

0.0451

4.2473

3.8414

0.0393

Tianjin

None

0.2710

49.3628

29.7970

0.0001

At most 1

0.1625

20.2767

15.4947

0.0088

At most 2

0.0421

3.9559

3.8414

0.0467

Hebei

None

0.6112

112.3088

29.7970

0.0000

At most 1

0.1668

25.3896

15.4947

0.0012

At most 2

0.0892

8.5998

3.8414

0.0034

Note: Critical values at the 5% significance level. “None”, “At most 1”, etc., denote the number of cointegrating relationships.

The AR root tests of the VAR models for each region (VAR(4) for Beijing, VAR(3) for Tianjin, and VAR(4) for Hebei) are shown in Figure 4. In all cases, the roots lie within the unit circle, confirming the stability of the respective models.

As shown in Table 5, the Granger causality test results for each region reveal the following:

• Beijing: Neither energy consumption structure optimization $\left(E_t\right)$ nor its evolution $\left(R_t\right)$ Grangercause industrial structure ecologization ($S_t$). However, industrial structure ecologization is found to be a Granger cause of both $E_{\mathrm{t}}$ and $R_t$. In addition, there is a bidirectional Granger causality between $E_t$ and $R_t$, indicating mutual feedback between energy structure optimization and its evolutionary capacity.

• Tianjin: Similar to Beijing, $E_t$ and $R_t$ do not Granger-cause $S_t$, but $S_t$ significantly Grangercauses both $E_t$ and $R_t$. Again, a bidirectional Granger causal relationship is observed between $E_t$ and $R_t$.

• Hebei: Unlike Beijing and Tianjin, all three variables show mutual Granger causality. That is, $E_t$ and $R_t$ both Granger-cause $S_t$, and $S_t$ in turn Granger-causes both $E_t$ and $R_t$. Additionally, $E_t$ and $R_t$ Granger-cause each other, reflecting a fully bidirectional relationship among the three dimensions.

Figure 4. AR root test results for the VAR models of the three regions
Table 5. Granger causality test results for the indicator variables of BTH region

Region

Null Hypothesis

F-Statistic

P-Value

Conclusion

Beijing

$E_t$ does not granger-cause $S_t$

6.1693

0.0057

Accepted

$R_t$ does not granger-cause $S_t$

7.1293

0.0283

Accepted

$S_t$ does not granger-cause $E_t$

4.4353

0.1089

Rejected

$R_t$ does not granger-cause $E_t$

0.8767

0.6451

Rejected

$S_t$ does not granger-cause $R_t$

4.5255

0.1041

Rejected

$E_t$ does not granger-cause $R_t$

0.3825

0.8259

Rejected

Tianjin

$E_t$ does not granger-cause $S_t$

10.8818

0.0043

Accepted

$R_t$ does not granger-cause $S_t$

10.1093

0.0064

Accepted

$S_t$ does not granger-cause $E_t$

0.3066

0.8579

Rejected

$R_t$ does not granger-cause $E_t$

0.1309

0.9366

Rejected

$S_t$ does not granger-cause $R_t$

0.1781

0.9148

Rejected

$E_t$ does not granger-cause $R_t$

0.8300

0.6603

Rejected

Hebei

$E_t$ does not granger-cause $S_t$

0.4349

0.8046

Rejected

$R_t$ does not granger-cause $S_t$

1.6106

0.4469

Rejected

$S_t$ does not granger-cause $E_t$

3.7639

0.1523

Rejected

$R_t$ does not granger-cause $E_t$

3.4390

0.1792

Accepted

$S_t$ does not granger-cause $R_t$

3.5123

0.1717

Rejected

$E_t$ does not granger-cause $R_t$

3.9905

0.1360

Rejected

4.2.3 Impulse response

The IRF of the VAR model enables the measurement of the impact of a shock to one variable on itself and on other variables, while holding the remaining variables constant. This allows for a dynamic examination of short-term relationships among variables. To accurately assess the dynamic linkages among industrial structure ecologization, energy consumption structure optimization, and the evolution of energy consumption optimization in the BTH region from 2001 to 2024, this study estimates the IRFs based on the established VAR model. The IRFs capture the dynamic characteristics inherent in the VAR system, and describe how shocks to endogenous variables affect both their current and future values, as well as those of other variables in the system.

(1) Impulse Response Analysis of Industrial Structure Ecologization in the BTH Region

As shown in Figure 5, when each of the three variables representing industrial structure ecologization in BTH experiences a one-standard-deviation shock to itself, a sharp and positive response appears in the first period. This response gradually weakens and converges toward zero around the sixth period. This indicates that the ecologization of industrial structures in all three regions exhibits a self-reinforcing mechanism that facilitates their own development.

In terms of regional spillovers:

• Beijing’s industrial structure ecologization generates a significant positive spillover effect on Tianjin in the second and third periods, while exerting a slight negative impact on Hebei, which is likely associated with mismatches in industrial structures caused by Hebei absorbing part of the non-capital functions from Beijing.

• Tianjin’s industrial structure ecologization produces mild positive spillovers to Beijing in the first and second periods, with the effects approaching zero after the third period. It also exerts a significant positive spillover to Hebei in the second period, which weakens thereafter.

• Hebei’s industrial structure ecologization yields mild positive spillovers to Beijing during the first and second periods, with the influence dissipating after the fourth period. It has a marginally positive impact on Tianjin in the first period, and becomes negligible afterward.

Figure 5. IRFs for industrial structure ecologization

In general, the industrial structure differences among the three regions are evident. The overall degree of industrial structure ecologization development ranks as Beijing $>$ Tianjin $>$ Hebei. Beijing has demonstrated superior performance in industrial transformation and upgrading, and its advantages in comprehensive development have become increasingly pronounced over time—consistent with its role as a national innovation hub. Tianjin has also achieved moderate progress, although it has not yet reached optimal performance. Hebei, due to its function as a receiving area for relocated industries, shows more pronounced mismatches in its industrial structure. In the short term, the ecologization of industrial structures in Beijing and Tianjin has an inhibitory effect on Hebei’s industrial ecologization. However, in the long term, the positive spillover effects from Beijing and Tianjin become more prominent, demonstrating leading and demonstrative roles in driving Hebei’s industrial upgrading.

The IRFs reveal the nuanced interaction patterns among the three regions, reflecting the phased characteristics of the BTH coordinated development process. For example, Beijing’s ecologization exerts a short-term suppressive effect on Hebei, which transitions into a long-term positive spillover. This aligns closely with the core policy of “relocating non-capital functions.” In the early stages of industrial relocation, traditional manufacturing sectors or high-energy-consuming and high-emission industries transferred to Hebei may not initially match in terms of technical standards, management capabilities, or environmental infrastructure, thus causing a temporary decline in Hebei’s ecologization index—a phenomenon referred to as the “inhibitory effect.” However, over the long run, these transfers are not merely spatial relocations but are accompanied by technology diffusion, managerial spillovers, and improved green standards. Beijing’s long-term positive spillover effects on Tianjin and Hebei substantiate its role as an innovation and high-end service hub. This observation is in line with the spatial structure outlined in the BTH Coordinated Development Plan, specifically the “one core, two cities, three axes, four zones, and multiple nodes” strategic layout, which emphasizes using core urban areas as growth poles to drive the upgrading of the entire region.

(2) Impulse Response Analysis of the Three Core Indicators in BTH

Figure 6 illustrates the impulse response relationships among Beijing's three key variables. A shock to industrial structure ecologization $\left(S_t\right)$ produces a slight negative impact on energy consumption structure optimization $\left(E_t\right)$ in periods 1 and 2, followed by a sustained positive effect from period 3 onward. This indicates that ecologization exerts a long-term promoting effect on energy optimization in Beijing. Regarding $S_t \rightarrow R_t$ (evolution of energy optimization), the response is significantly positive during periods 1 to 3, and gradually fades afterward. For $E_t$ (self-shock), the strongest positive response occurs in period 1, followed by gradual attenuation, suggesting that Beijing's energy consumption structure exhibits a self-reinforcing dynamic. $E_t$ also has a short-term positive influence on $S_t$ during periods 1–2, which diminishes after period 3. Additionally, $E_t \rightarrow R_t$ shows moderate positive effects in periods 2 to 4, with the influence fading over time. For $R_t$ (self-shock), the largest response occurs in period 1, and then declines, indicating that $R_t$ also follows a self-reinforcing pattern. $R_t$ exerts positive effects on $S_t$ in periods 1 to 3, with the influence disappearing after period 4. This implies that energy optimization evolution can effectively drive the ecologization process in the short term. Moreover, $R_t$ has a significant and lasting positive impact on $E_t$, highlighting its central role in upgrading the region's energy structure.

These findings are consistent with Beijing’s industrial development pathway as the capital’s core function zone. From 2014 to 2024, the proportion of tertiary industry rose from 77.9% to 83.5%, with low-carbon sectors such as finance and information services accounting for over 40%—a structural shift that directly promoted the optimization of energy consumption. For instance, coal consumption fell from 13.2% in 2015 to 3.8% in 2023, while the share of electricity and other green energy sources increased to 58%. However, the short-term negative response can be attributed to energy consumption rigidities during structural transition—e.g., from 2016 to 2018, rapid clustering of headquarters economy led to a surge in commercial energy use, pushing annual natural gas consumption growth to over 12%, which temporarily slowed the pace of energy structure optimization.

As shown in Figure 7, a shock to Tianjin's $S_t$ produces slight positive effects on $E_t$ in periods 1 and 2, which gradually dissipate thereafter. This suggests that the long-term impact of ecologization on energy optimization in Tianjin is limited, consistent with its existing second- and third-sector structures and current energy use profiles. For $S_t \rightarrow R_t$, there are notable negative effects in periods 2 and 3, which also disappear over time. $E_t$ in Tianjin shows a strong self-reinforcing response: the largest effect occurs in period 1 and weakens thereafter. $E_t \rightarrow S_t$ displays a weak long-term positive effect, while $E_t \rightarrow R_t$ has virtually no influence over the long run. $R_t$ also shows a positive selfresponse, peaking in period 1. As for $R_t \rightarrow S_t$, a slight long-run positive effect is observed, while $R_t \rightarrow E_t$ exhibits a significant long-term positive effect, suggesting that evolutionary improvements in energy consumption structure do contribute to sustained optimization.

Overall, the weak long-run effect of $S_t$ on $E_t$ in Tianjin reflects path dependence on its “Heavy Industry + Port Economy” composite structure. As of 2022, petrochemical industries still accounted for 18% of Tianjin’s large-scale industrial output, and diesel consumption from port logistics remained around 25%. These traditional energy demands diluted the greening effects of structural upgrades. Furthermore, Tianjin's natural gas share in energy consumption reached 32% in 2023, leaving limited room for further optimization—a pattern echoed in the rapidly fading positive effects observed in the impulse responses.

Figure 6. IRFs for Beijing
Figure 7. IRFs for Tianjin
Figure 8. IRFs for Hebei

Figure 8 highlights the distinct impulse dynamics in Hebei compared to Beijing and Tianjin. Specifically:

• A shock to $S_t$ yields positive effects on $E_t$ in periods 3, 6, and 9, which gradually decline. Conversely, $S_t \rightarrow R_t$ shows negative effects, suggesting trade-offs between structure greening and optimization evolution in the short term.

• $ E_t \rightarrow S_t$ is significantly positive in period 1, diminishing after period 5. $E_t$ (self-shock) exhibits a modestly positive long-term self-response, while $E_t \rightarrow R_t$ shows a negative long-run effect, possibly due to inefficiencies in resource reallocation.

• $ R_t \rightarrow S_t$ is significantly positive in period 1, but fades after period 5. $R_t \rightarrow E_t$ shows a positive long-run effect, while $R_t$ (self-shock) has a negative long-term response, indicating adjustment pressure within the energy system.

These dynamics reveal the unique challenges faced by resource-based regions like Hebei. In the short term, energy-saving upgrades in traditional sectors (e.g., steel, cement) significantly enhance energy structure optimization—by 2021, 90% of Hebei's steel industry had completed ultra-low emissions upgrades. However, the long-term effects of ecologization on the energy structure are cyclical. Between 2016 and 2019, capacity reduction policies promoted optimization; between 2020 and 2022, post-pandemic rebounds in heavy industries reversed some gains; since 2023, green transition policies have regained momentum. These cycles are reflected in the multi-peak patterns observed in the IRFs.

On the whole, industrial structure ecologization in BTH exerts long-term positive effects on their respective energy consumption structure optimization. Conversely, energy structure optimization also positively influences ecologization in each region to a certain extent—particularly in Beijing and Tianjin, where short-term effects are strong and significant. Additionally, the evolutionary aspect of energy optimization ($R_t$) consistently shows positive long-term impacts on $S_t$ across all three regions. Notably, short-term effects are strongest in Beijing and Hebei, suggesting that enhancing the share of electricity and other green energy sources—while reducing reliance on coal and petrochemical energy—offers an internally driven and sustainable path toward high-quality economic development in the BTH region.

4.2.4 Variance decomposition

Variance decomposition analysis enables further examination of the relative contribution of each variable to the forecast error variance of the others. Specifically, it allows quantification of the extent to which industrial structure ecologization ($L n S$) contributes to the optimization of energy consumption structure ($L n E$), and vice versa, in BTH.

Variance decomposition is employed to further evaluate the extent to which industrial structure ecologization ($LnS$) contributes to the variation in energy consumption structure optimization ($LnE$), and vice versa, in the three subregions of the BTH region. As shown in Table 6, Table 7, and Table 8, in Beijing, the influence of industrial structure ecologization on energy consumption optimization gradually increases—from 0.005% in period 2 to 2.146% in period 10. Conversely, the contribution of energy consumption optimization to the changes in industrial structure ecologization declines from 23.78% in period 1 to 14.99% in period 10. In Tianjin, a similar upward trend is observed: the influence of industrial structure ecologization on energy consumption optimization rises from 0.667% in period 2 to 1.639% in period 10. Meanwhile, the explanatory power of energy consumption optimization for industrial structure ecologization decreases from 14.891% in period 1 to 12.893% in period 10. In Hebei, the mutual dynamic is more pronounced. The contribution of industrial structure ecologization to energy consumption optimization rises sharply—from 2.768% in period 2 to 21.075% in period 10. Conversely, the contribution of energy consumption optimization to industrial structure ecologization declines from a very high 87.026% in period 1 to 67.609% in period 10. These results reveal that the degree and direction of interaction between industrial structure ecologization and energy consumption optimization vary significantly across regions, largely depending on their respective stages of development and industrial complexity.

Table 6. Forecast error variance decomposition of $LnS$ and $LnE$ in Beijing

Period

Variance Decomposition of LnS (%)

Variance Decomposition of LnE (%)

S.E

LnS

LnE

S.E

LnS

LnE

1

0.0051

100.0000

0.0000

0.0088

23.7826

76.2174

2

0.0053

99.9943

0.0055

0.0094

23.0404

76.9596

3

0.0053

99.0736

0.9263

0.0104

18.9113

81.0887

4

0.0054

98.6105

1.3894

0.0108

17.5488

82.4512

5

0.0054

98.2967

1.7032

0.0112

16.4926

83.5074

6

0.0054

0.0054

98.1441

1.8558

0.0113

15.9281

84.0719

7

0.0054

0.0054

98.0289

1.9710

0.0115

15.5341

84.4659

8

0.0054

97.9495

2.0504

0.0116

15.2815

84.7185

9

0.0054

0.0054

97.8925

2.1074

0.0116

15.1084

84.8916

10

0.0054

0.0054

97.8539

2.1461

0.0117

14.9928

85.0072

Table 7. Forecast error variance decomposition of $LnS$ and $LnE$ in Tianjin

Period

Variance Decomposition of LnS (%)

Variance Decomposition of LnE (%)

S.E

LnS

LnE

S.E

LnS

LnE

1

0.0093

100.0000

0.0000

0.0161

14.8916

85.1084

2

0.0097

99.3334

0.6665

0.0171

14. 8738

85. 1362

3

0.0097

98.8889

1.1110

0.0189

14.8617

85.1383

4

0.0097

98.7498

1.2501

0.0195

13.7981

86.2019

5

0.0097

98.5859

1.4141

0.0201

13.4729

86.5271

6

0.0098

0.0054

98.5045

1.4955

0.0204

13.9288

86.0712

7

0.0098

0.0054

98.4423

1.5558

0.0206

13.5747

86.4253

8

0.0098

98.4042

1.5958

0.0207

12.4895

87.5105

9

0.0098

0.0054

98.3778

1.6221

0.0208

12.3285

87.6715

10

0.0099

0.0054

98.3609

1.6391

0.0209

12.8936

87.1064

Table 8. Forecast error variance decomposition of $LnS$ and $LnE$ in Hebei

Period

Variance Decomposition of LnS (%)

Variance Decomposition of LnE (%)

S.E

LnS

LnE

S.E

LnS

LnE

1

0.0061

100.0000

0.0000

0.0109

87.0260

12.9740

2

0.0064

97.2314

2.7686

0.0122

83.1779

16.8221

3

0.0069

82.7217

17.2783

0.0132

71.7188

28.2812

4

0.0072

80.0300

19.9699

0.0136

68.7520

31.2480

5

0.0072

79.6778

20.3222

0.0137

68.3056

31.6944

6

0.0072

0.0054

79.2441

20.7559

0.0138

67.9185

32.0815

7

0.0073

0.0054

79.0235

20.9765

0.0138

67.7110

32.2890

8

0.0073

78.9663

21.0337

0.0139

67.6498

32.3502

9

0.0073

0.0054

78.9392

21.0608

0.0139

67.6233

32.3767

10

0.0074

0.0054

78.9243

21.0757

0.0139

67.6093

32.3907

The variance decomposition further quantifies the intrinsic drivers of the "industry–energy" system in the BTH region:

• In Hebei, the contribution of energy consumption optimization to industrial structure ecologization is substantially higher than in Beijing or Tianjin. This validates the earlier findings that Hebei’s developmental stage renders its industrial transformation more sensitive to changes in energy structure. Policy shifts in the energy domain are rapidly transmitted to the industrial system, yielding visible structural responses.

• In contrast, industrial structure ecologization in Beijing and Tianjin is predominantly driven by internal inertia. This indicates that their industrial systems are more complex and mature, with transformation relying more on endogenous forces such as technological innovation, knowledge accumulation, and the input of high-end production factors. In these two regions, energy structure optimization serves more as a coordinated result, rather than the primary driving force.

This divergence provides a quantitative foundation for region-specific policy design:

• For Hebei, emphasis should be placed on energy infrastructure development and clean energy substitution to trigger structural transformation.

• For Beijing and Tianjin, policies should prioritize technological innovation and institutional reforms to activate endogenous dynamics within their advanced industrial ecosystems.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations

5.1 Key Findings

The empirical analysis confirms that industrial structure ecologization and energy consumption structure optimization in the BTH region are characterized by significant spatial interdependence and dynamic feedback mechanisms. In the short term, Hebei experiences structural adjustment pressures as it absorbs relocated industries from Beijing and Tianjin, resulting in temporary inhibitory effects. However, in the long run, spillovers in knowledge, technology, and institutional experience become dominant, positioning Beijing and Tianjin as leading forces in Hebei’s industrial upgrading. This validates the strategic value of regional coordination in advancing long-term ecological transformation.

The causal relationships between variables are bidirectional: industrial ecologization drives both energy optimization and its evolutionary progression, and these, in turn, contribute back to structural transformation. Particularly in Beijing and Tianjin, short-term effects from energy optimization on industrial ecologization are strong, while Hebei exhibits greater long-term sensitivity. These differences stem from the regions’ distinct industrial maturity levels. In Hebei, transformation is more responsive to energy policy adjustments, whereas in Beijing and Tianjin, upgrading is primarily driven by endogenous forces such as innovation, advanced services, and institutional quality.

Variance decomposition results quantify these dynamics, highlighting that the influence of energy optimization on industrial structure is strongest in Hebei, while Beijing and Tianjin rely more on internal mechanisms. These findings underscore the need for differentiated regional approaches to achieve integrated “industry–energy” transitions.

5.2 Policy Advice

To facilitate green and coordinated development across the BTH region, a region-specific strategy must be adopted. Beijing should leverage its advantages in innovation and high-end services to pilot urban-rural integrated smart energy systems, including distributed solar and geothermal applications. These models should be designed for replication in Tianjin and Hebei. Tianjin should focus on low-carbon transformation of port logistics and advanced manufacturing, implementing technologies such as shore power and digital process upgrading to reduce industrial carbon intensity. Hebei should enhance its role as a green industrial receiver by attracting low-carbon projects aligned with its supply chains and supporting them with clean infrastructure.

A spatially coordinated governance mechanism should be established to amplify positive spillovers. Regional platforms are needed to convert Beijing’s demonstration effect into endogenous growth across the region. A unified monitoring and early warning system for “industry–energy–environment” interaction should be developed, integrating real-time data from all three regions to track system imbalances and guide timely policy adjustment.

Finally, energy structure optimization should be used as a key lever for driving industrial upgrading. In Hebei, policy should emphasize clean energy infrastructure as a forcing mechanism for transformation. In Beijing and Tianjin, efforts should focus on stimulating internal innovation through enhanced R&D capacity and institutional reform. These measures will reinforce regional spillover effects and promote sustainable and high-quality economic growth across the BTH region.

Data Availability

The data used to support the research findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References
1.
L. Zhang, “A changing pattern of regional CO₂ emissions in China,” Geogr. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2.
S. H. Deng, J. Zhang, F. Shen, H. Guo, Y. W. Li, and H. Xiao, “The relationship between industry structure, household-number and energy consumption in China,” Energy Sources Part B, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 325–333, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3.
L. W. Pan, J. J. Chen, Y. L. Zhao, B. Y. Xu, and T. C. Jiao, “Towards optimal customized electricity pricing via iterative two-layer optimization for consumers and prosumers,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 469, no. 267, p. 143208, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4.
X. Zou, X. Yang, and J. Jiang, “The influence of energy consumption structure adjustment on the upgrading of manufacturing structure—Empirical analysis based on manufacturing industry segments,” Soft Sci., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 45–53, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5.
Y. Zhou, Z. He, L. Ma, Y. Yang, T. Zhang, and L. Chen, “Spatial and temporal differentiation of China’s provincial scale energy consumption structure,” Resour. Sci., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2247–2257, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6.
Y. Han and L. Ma, “Effectiveness measurement of industrial structure transformation and upgrading in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,” J. Cap. Univ. Econ. Bus., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 45–55, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7.
S. Wang and W. Zhang, “Optimization of industrial structure based on goals of energy intensity and economic growth for Jing-Jin-Ji,” Forum Sci. Technol. China, vol. 2018, no. 7, pp. 88–96, 2018. [Google Scholar]
8.
Y. Bai, H. Zheng, Y. Shan, J. Meng, and Y. Li, “The consumptionbased carbon emissions in the JingJinJi Urban agglomeration over China’s economic transition,” Earth’s Future, vol. 9, no. 9, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9.
D. Wijesekara, P. Amarasinghe, A. Induranga, V. Vithanage, and K. R. Koswattage, “Energy, exergy, and environmental impact analysis and optimization of coal-biomass combustion combined cycle CHP systems,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 2363, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10.
M. Zhang, R. Liu, and H. Sun, “Achieving carbon-neutral economies through circular economy, digitalization, and energy transition,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, p. 13779, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11.
F. Niu, Z. Feng, and H. Liu, “Evaluation of resources environmental carrying capacity and its application in industrial restructuring in Tibet, China,” Acta Geogr. Sin., vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 1563–1575, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12.
Y. Zhao and Q. Wang, “Study on impacts of energy consumption and economic growth on carbon emissions in Jing-Jin-Ji area,” Energy China, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 34–40, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13.
J. Lan, A. Malik, M. Lenzen, D. McBain, and K. Kanemoto, “A structural decomposition analysis of global energy footprints,” Appl. Energy, vol. 163, pp. 436–451, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14.
S. S. Chopra and V. Khanna, “Understanding resilience in industrial symbiosis networks: Insights from network analysis,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 141, pp. 86–94, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15.
H. Lütkepohl, New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005. [Google Scholar]
16.
B. Lin and G. Zhang, “Can industrial restructuring significantly reduce energy consumption? Evidence from China,” Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, vol. 54, no. 5, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17.
J. Wu and X. Cui, “Industrial structure optimization and natural gas consumption in Jing-Jin-Ji: Based on VAR model,” Technoecon. Manag. Res., vol. 2021, no. 7, pp. 124–128, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18.
D. Gao, G. Kong, L. Ma, X. Yan, and H. Zhang, “Energy development status and developing focus of varied regions in China,” Chinese Eng. Sci., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19.
European Commission, “The Clean Industrial Revolution: A Competitiveness and Decarbonization Joint Roadmap,” 2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0085 [Google Scholar]
20.
J. Axenbeck, A. Berner, and T. Kneib, “What drives the relationship between digitalization and energy demand? Exploring heterogeneity in German manufacturing firms,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 369, p. 122317, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21.
L. Massé, “Why path dependence leads to a fossilized Alberta: regionalism and the climate transition in Canada,” Environ. Polit., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 882–902, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Qiao, Z. J. (2025). Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. J. Green Econ. Low-Carbon Dev., 4(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd040204
Z. J. Qiao, "Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," J. Green Econ. Low-Carbon Dev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 102-115, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd040204
@research-article{Qiao2025DynamicCB,
title={Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region},
author={Zhanjun Qiao},
journal={Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development},
year={2025},
page={102-115},
doi={https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd040204}
}
Zhanjun Qiao, et al. "Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region." Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, v 4, pp 102-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd040204
Zhanjun Qiao. "Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region." Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, 4, (2025): 102-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd040204
QIAO Z J. Dynamic Coupling Between the Ecological Evolution of Industrial Structure and the Optimization of Energy Consumption Structure: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, 2025, 4(2): 102-115. https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd040204
cc
©2025 by the author(s). Published by Acadlore Publishing Services Limited, Hong Kong. This article is available for free download and can be reused and cited, provided that the original published version is credited, under the CC BY 4.0 license.