Javascript is required
Aaker, David A and Jones, Morgan J (1971). "Modelling Store Choice Behaviour," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol VIII, February, pp 38-42.
Banerjee, A and Divakar, S (2000). "Price Threshold in a Promotion Intensive Environment: How Consumers Optimally Make Decisions on How Much to Buy," Decision, Vol 27, No 1, pp 27-58.
Bell, David R; Ho, Teck-Hua and Tang, Christopher S (1998). "Determining Where to Shop: Fixed and Variable Costs of Shopping," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXXV, August, pp 352-369.
Berry, L L ( 2001). "Old Pillars of New Retailing," Harvard Business Review, Vol 79, April, No 4, pp 131-137.
Dash, Joseph F; Schiffman, Leon G and Berenson, Conrad (1976). "Information Search and Store Choice, "Journal of Advertising Research, Vol 16, No 3, June, pp 35-40.
Dodge, Robert H and Summer, Harry H (1969). "Choosing Between Retail Stores," Journal of Retailing, Vol 45, No 3, Fall, pp 11-21.
Erdem, Orhan; Oumlil, Ben A and Tuncalp, Secil (1999). "Consumer Values and the Importance of Store At- tributes," International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol 27, No 4, pp 137-144.
Fotheringham, Stewart A (1988). "Consumer Store Choice and Choice Set Definition," Marketing Science,Vol 7, No 3, Summer, pp 299-310.
Hisrich, Robert D; Dornoff, Ronald J and Kernan, Jerome B (1972). "Perceived Risk in Store Selection," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol IX, November, pp 435-439.
James Barnes. “Establishing Meaningful Customer Relationships: Why some Companies and Brands mean more to their Customers”. Managing Service Quality, vol. 13, No.3, 2003, pp. 178-186.
Jolson, Marvin A and Spath, W F (1973). "Understanding and Fulfilling Shopper Requirements: An Anomaly in Retailing," Journal of Retailing, Vol 49, No 2, pp 38-50.
Kenhove, Patrick Van; Wulf, Kr istof De. and Waterschoot, Walter Van (1999). "The Impact of Task Definition on Store-Attribute Saliences and Store Choice, "Journal of Retailing, Vol 75,.
Kim, B and Park, Kyungdo (1997). "Studying Patterns of Grocery Shopping Trips," Journal of Retailing, Vol 73, No 4, pp 501-517.
Leszczyc, Peter Popkowski, T L; Sinha, Ashish and Timmermans, Harry J P (2000). "Consumer Store Choice Dynamics: An Analysis of the Competitive Market Structure for Grocery Stores," Journal of Retailing, Vol 76, No 3, pp 323-345.
Malhotra, Naresh K (1983). "A Threshold Model of Store Choice," Journal of Retailing, Vol 59, No 2, Summer, pp 3-21.
Martineau, Pierre (1958). "The Personality of the Retail Store," Harvard Business Review, \bl 36, January- February, pp 47-55.
Mattson, Bruce E (1982). "Situational Influences on Store Choice," Journal of Retailing, Vol 58, No 3, Fall, pp 46-58.
Meyer, Robert J and Eagle, Thomas C (1982). "Context- Induced Parameter Instability in a Disaggregate-Sto-chastic Model of Store Choice," Journal of Marketing Research, February, pp 62-71.
Tang, Christopher S; Bell, David R and Ho, Teck-Hua (2001). "Store Choice and Shopping Behaviour: How Price Format Works," California Management Review, Vol43, No 2, Winter, pp 56-74.
Search
Open Access
Research article

An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets

dindayal swain*
International Management Institute, Bhubaneswar, India
Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management
|
Volume 2, Issue 1, 2015
|
Pages 141-153
Received: 01-11-2015,
Revised: 02-17-2015,
Accepted: 02-23-2015,
Available online: 03-23-2015
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

Indian Consumers always remain a marketer’s challenge. The great Indian ever increasing consuming class has arrived and is waiting to be served. Currently as the services sector contributes 60% to GDP of India (Source: IBEF) and 50% population is below 25 years of age, 65% population of the country is below 35 years of age (Census of 2011), Indian retail sector promises to scale new heights in times to come. India’s largest retailers (in terms of turnover) are Future Group, Aditya Birla, Shoppers Stop, RPG, WEST SIDE, Life Style, Ebony, Pyramid and Globus. In Bhubaneswar, the field of Groceries and Consumer Durables is dominated by organized new retail outlets like Reliance Fresh, BIG BAZZAR, Pantaloon, The World, The Grains etc. Hence, data for the purpose of the study was collected from who patronize these retail outlets. The perceptions of the consumers as regards the new retail outlets and select variables like educational qualification and income of the consumers were analyzed by applying the Chi- Square test. Factor Analysis is incorporated to identify the factors that influence the buying decision of consumers. Five factors were identified, viz., product features & assortments, extended marketing mix, pragmatic consumption, customer relationship & loyalty and sales offers. The Chi-Square test was also applied to assess the significance of consumer perception factors. It is concluded that pragmatism and functionality are the hall mark of modern consumption. This research paper is an honest endeavor of the researcher to understand consumer psychology for ONRO.

Keywords: Analytical discourse, Choice, Consumer perception, Organized new retail outlets, Grocery and consumer durables

1. Introduction

Consumer in India has always been pretty tricky to double guess. It is a market whose potential and desire to consume has perhaps moved ahead of the marketer’s mental model of it. It continues to be a multitier market. In short, it does appear that the Great Indian Consuming class has arrived, and is waiting to be served. Shopping is emerging as an important activity. Consumers prefer one stop shopping arcades with food courts and gaming Jones. Hence, organized retailing has centered on our retail radar. Interesting developments are taking place in the world of retailing. RAI (Retailers Association of India) is the voice of the Indian organized and modern retailers.

RAI represents the modern retail Industry of India. Technopak survey shows that the Indian consumer is willing to shop at a place where his time is valued, where he knows that the store genuinely wants his money, and is willing to work for it.

2. Objectives of the Study

1. To examine the association between consumer’s perceptions as regards organized new retail outlets (ONRO) and select variables.

2. To identify the factors that influence consumer’s perceptions as regards new retail outlets.

3. To ascertain the significance of consumer perception factors.

4. To suggest measures for improving the proper functioning of new organized retail outlets.

3. Scope of the Study

In recent times, a new set of players have entered in to the retail party. The field of groceries and consumer durables is dominated by organized new retail outlets like Reliance Fresh, BIG BAZZAR, Pantaloons, The World, and The Grains etc. Hence data for the purpose of the study was collected from consumers who patronize these new retail outlets.

4. Literature Review

While brand choice is devoid of any geography, the choice of a store is very much influenced by location (Fotheringham, 1998 andMeyer and Eagle, 1982). It is as much an information processing behaviour as any other purchase decision. In a study of store choice behaviour among audio equipment shoppers, Dash, Schiffman and Berenson (1976) found that the level of pre- purchase information regarding the brand determined the type of store chosen. Shoppers who had higher level of pre-purchase information generally shopped at the specialty store, whereas shoppers with low pre-purchase information bought at departmental stores. This is mainly attributed to customers adopting a risk reduction policy with regards to their impending purchase.Leszczyc, Sinha, and Timmermans (2000) have shown that store choice is a dynamic decision and can be conceptualized as a problem of deciding when and where to shop. The first decision is the traditional store location choice problem. The second is the shopping trip incidence problem relating to the timing of shopping trips. The two decision processes are correlated. Store choice is dependent on the timing of shopping trips as consumers may go to a local store for short 'fill-in' trips and go to a more distant grocery store for regular shopping trips (Kahn and Schmittlein, 1989). Both decisions are influenced by shopper characteristics and consumption patterns (Leszczyc and Timmermans, 1979; Kim and Park, 1997).

5. Methodology

Given the limited amount of information available on the choice criteria of Indian consumers for organized new retail outlets (ONRO), the researcher have decided to design an exploratory study to identify major preferences among shoppers in India. This involved a field survey conducted across different stores in Bhubaneswar. Respondents were approached at the shop after they had finished shopping and were leaving the store. It was felt that shop intercept (exit interviews) would capture the recency effect and an interview away from the shop might bring only "visualized perception" and not the real experience. The Study is based on primary data. The primary data was collected by issuing questionnaires to 750 consumers in Bhubaneswar during April-October 2013. The perceptions of the consumers with regards ONRO were analyzed by applying appropriate stasticial analysis like Chi- Square test and factor analysis. The hypothesis that consumer’s perceptions as regards organized new retail outlets (ONRO) are positively correlated with the independent variables like education and income group of consumers.

6. Results and Discussion

Association between perceptions of consumers with regards organized new retail outlets and independent variables like education and income groups of consumers.

Table 1. Chi- Square Results

Independent Variables

d.f

X2 values

p- values

Inference

Educational qualification of consumers

2

7.893

0.019

Significant

Income of the consumers

2

9.199

0.010

Significant

Table shows that there is significant association between perceptions of consumers with regards organized new retail outlets and independent variables like education and income group of consumers.

6.1 Factor Analysis for Identifying Relationship Factors

Factor analysis has been applied to investigate the underlying structure of the variables that influence consumer behavior with respect to organized new retail outlets (ONRO). KMO measure of sampling adequacy is 0.676 and Bartlett’s test shows a significance of 0.000. Therefore factor analysis can be applied to 15 variables measuring perception of consumers with regards to the organized new retail outlets (ONRO). The anti image metrics of variables measuring perception of consumers with regards to the organized new retail outlets was calculated and it is observed that all measures of sampling adequacy (MSA) being more than 0.5, all the 15 variables can be subjected to factor analysis. Grouping of variables.

The Principal Component Method of factor analysis method and varimax rotation method has been used to group the 15 variables measuring perception of consumers with regards to the organized new retail outlets.

Table 2. Factor extraction perception of consumers with regards to the organized new retail outlets (ONRO)

Variables

Initial Eigen value and extraction sum

of squares loadings

Rotation sum of squared loadings

Eigen

value

% of

variance

Cumulative

%

Total

% of

variance

Cumulative

%

I purchase all my requirements

from ONRO

4.676

27.171

27.171

2.135

14.230

14.230

I think that the quality of the products is good

1.458

9.718

36.889

1.887

12.580

26.810

I feel that the price of the

product charged is reasonable

1.355

9.035

45.923

1.817

12.111

38.920

Products are available in all sizes

1.213

8.087

54.010

1.786

11.906

50.826

I feel that the packages are convenient to handle

1.090

7.268

61.278

1.568

10.452

61278

I am a regular customer of ONRO

0.982

6.546

67.824

I buy whatever brand of

products are available in ONRO

0.939

6.261

74.084

There is good after sales service

0.747

4.982

79.066

There is good customer relationship in ONRO

0.704

4.695

83.761

Terms of sale are attractive in ONRO

0.577

3.846

87.607

There is facility for physical inspection before purchase of goods

0.504

3.363

90.970

ONRO deliver products on time to my house

0.449

2.992

93.963

There are a lot of offers & complimentary products in ONRO

0.401

2.671

96.634

I am satisfied with the money spent in ONRO

0.278

1.852

98.486

Prices are low in ONRO when compared to other petty shops

0.227

1.614

100

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis

Table No 2 gives the results of factor analysis. The five factors have accounted for a total variance of 61.27%.

6.2 Rotated Component Matrix
Table 3. Rotated Component Matrix

Variables

Component

1

Component

2

Component

3

Component

4

Component

5

I purchase all my requirements from ONRO

0.356

0.280

0.104

0.500

0.115

I think that the quality of the products is good

0.854

0.159

0.005

0.110

0.0046

I feel that the price of the product charged is reasonable

0.809

0.0072

0.240

0.126

0.0040

Products are available in all sizes

0.116

0.709

0.107

0.0023

-0.003

I feel that the packages are convenient to handle

0.312

0.612

-0.262

0.284

0.007

I am a regular customer of ONRO

0.219

0.0017

-0.002

0.725

0.200

I buy whatever brand of products are available in ONRO

0.500

-0.221

0.447

0.002

0.324

There is good after sales service

0.188

0.500

0.387

0.250

0.195

There is good customer relationship in ONRO

-0.007

0.0077

0.199

0.829

0.003

Terms of sale are attractive in ONRO

0.109

0.283

-0.140

0.242

0.649

There is facility for physical inspection

before purchase of goods

-2.55

0.587

0.296

0.0006

0.246

ONRO deliver products on time to my house

-0.0006

0.137

0.788

0.160

-0.199

There are a lot of offers & complimentary products in ONRO

0.0022

-0.0001

0.131

0.007

0.807

I am satisfied with the money spent in

ONRO

0.347

0.399

0.500

-0.145

0.252

Prices are low in ONRO when compared to other petty shops

0.157

0.158

0.526

0.273

0.357

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalizations
Table 4. Naming of Factors

Sl. No.

Overall sample N= 750

Factor 1

Product Features

Factor 2

Extended Marketing Mix

Factor 3

Pragmatic Consumption

Factor 4

Customer Relationship

Factor 5

Sales Offers

% of total variance explained

61.278%

Table 5. Consumer Perception Variables in respective Factors

Factors

Variables

Factor

Loadings

Factor 1 Product Features

I think that the quality of the products are good

0.854

I feel that the price of the product charged is reasonable

0.809

I buy whatever brand of products are available in ONRO

0.500

Factor 2 Extended Marketing Mix

Products are available in all sizes

0.709

I feel that the packages are convenient to handle

0.612

There is good after sales service in ONRO

0.500

There is facility for physical inspection before purchase of goods

0.587

Factor 3 Pragmatic Consumption

ONRO deliver products on time to my house

0.788

I am satisfied with the money spent in ONRO

0.500

Prices are low in ONRO when compared to other mom and pop stores

0.526

Factor 4 Customer Relationship

There is good customer relationship in ONRO

0.829

I purchase all my requirements from ONRO

0.500

I am a regular customer of ONRO

0.725

Factor 5 Sales Offer

Terms of sale are attractive in ONRO

0.649

There are a lot of offers and complimentary products in ONRO

0.807

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis
6.3 Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalizations

Tables 2, 3,4 and 5 shows that Principal Component Method of Factor Analysis and the Varimax Rotation Method have been used to group the 15 variables into 5 factors. The most dominant factor is ‘product features’ and it includes 3 variables viz, quality of the products, reasonable price of the products and availability of all brands of the product and it explains 14.23% of the variance. The next factor is “Extended Marketing Mix”, which comprises of 4 variables viz, availability of products in all sizes, convenient package, good after sales service and facility for physical inspection before purchase. This explains 12.58% of the variance. The third factor is ‘Pragmatic Consumption’ consisting of 3 variables viz, on time of delivery, satisfaction with money spent in ONRO and comparatively lower prices. This explains 12.11% of variance. The fourth factor is ‘Customer Relationship’ comprising of 3 variables viz, purchase of all requirements from ONRO, regular customer of ONRO and good customer relationship at ONRO. This factor explains 11.90% of the variance. The list factor being ‘Sales Offers’ includes attractive terms of sales and lot of offers and complimentary products in ONRO. This explains 10.45% of the variance.

6.4 Association between Consumer Perception Factors with regards Organized New Retail Outlets (ONRO) and selected Variables

Chi- Square test was used to test the association between consumer perception factors with regards ONRO and independent variables like age and occupation groups of consumers, frequency of purchase, total value of purchase and factors influencing purchase.

Table 6. Chi- Square Results

Independent Variables

Factor

d.f.

X2 values

p- values

Inference

Age groups of consumers

2

2

7.893

0.019

Significant

Occupation groups of consumers

3

2

9.199

0.010

Significant

Frequency of purchase

5

24

38.478

0.031

Significant

Total value of purchase

2

30

49.521

0.014

Significant

Factors influencing purchase

3

60

118.340

0.000

Significant

Factors influencing purchase

3

48

85.780

0.001

Significant

Factors influencing purchase

4

54

75.102

0.030

Significant

Table shows that there is significant  association between perception of consumers with regards  to ONRO and independent variables like age and occupation of consumers. There is also significant association between consumer perception factors with regards to ONRO and independent variables like frequency of purchase, total value of  purchases  and  factors influencing purchase. This shows that out of the five consumer perception factors, four are significant. Hence the ONRO should concentrate and improve them.

7. Suggestion

Pragmatism and Functionality are the hallmark of the modern consumption. Hence ONRO must provide:

 Real value for money product/ services to the consumers.

 Availability of all sizes of products

 Good after sales service

 Facility for physical inspection of products

 On time home delivery

 Competitive prices

 Good customer relationship and loyalty

 Attractive terms of sale and offers

8. Conclusion

References
Aaker, David A and Jones, Morgan J (1971). "Modelling Store Choice Behaviour," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol VIII, February, pp 38-42.
Banerjee, A and Divakar, S (2000). "Price Threshold in a Promotion Intensive Environment: How Consumers Optimally Make Decisions on How Much to Buy," Decision, Vol 27, No 1, pp 27-58.
Bell, David R; Ho, Teck-Hua and Tang, Christopher S (1998). "Determining Where to Shop: Fixed and Variable Costs of Shopping," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXXV, August, pp 352-369.
Berry, L L ( 2001). "Old Pillars of New Retailing," Harvard Business Review, Vol 79, April, No 4, pp 131-137.
Dash, Joseph F; Schiffman, Leon G and Berenson, Conrad (1976). "Information Search and Store Choice, "Journal of Advertising Research, Vol 16, No 3, June, pp 35-40.
Dodge, Robert H and Summer, Harry H (1969). "Choosing Between Retail Stores," Journal of Retailing, Vol 45, No 3, Fall, pp 11-21.
Erdem, Orhan; Oumlil, Ben A and Tuncalp, Secil (1999). "Consumer Values and the Importance of Store At- tributes," International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol 27, No 4, pp 137-144.
Fotheringham, Stewart A (1988). "Consumer Store Choice and Choice Set Definition," Marketing Science,Vol 7, No 3, Summer, pp 299-310.
Hisrich, Robert D; Dornoff, Ronald J and Kernan, Jerome B (1972). "Perceived Risk in Store Selection," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol IX, November, pp 435-439.
James Barnes. “Establishing Meaningful Customer Relationships: Why some Companies and Brands mean more to their Customers”. Managing Service Quality, vol. 13, No.3, 2003, pp. 178-186.
Jolson, Marvin A and Spath, W F (1973). "Understanding and Fulfilling Shopper Requirements: An Anomaly in Retailing," Journal of Retailing, Vol 49, No 2, pp 38-50.
Kenhove, Patrick Van; Wulf, Kr istof De. and Waterschoot, Walter Van (1999). "The Impact of Task Definition on Store-Attribute Saliences and Store Choice, "Journal of Retailing, Vol 75,.
Kim, B and Park, Kyungdo (1997). "Studying Patterns of Grocery Shopping Trips," Journal of Retailing, Vol 73, No 4, pp 501-517.
Leszczyc, Peter Popkowski, T L; Sinha, Ashish and Timmermans, Harry J P (2000). "Consumer Store Choice Dynamics: An Analysis of the Competitive Market Structure for Grocery Stores," Journal of Retailing, Vol 76, No 3, pp 323-345.
Malhotra, Naresh K (1983). "A Threshold Model of Store Choice," Journal of Retailing, Vol 59, No 2, Summer, pp 3-21.
Martineau, Pierre (1958). "The Personality of the Retail Store," Harvard Business Review, \bl 36, January- February, pp 47-55.
Mattson, Bruce E (1982). "Situational Influences on Store Choice," Journal of Retailing, Vol 58, No 3, Fall, pp 46-58.
Meyer, Robert J and Eagle, Thomas C (1982). "Context- Induced Parameter Instability in a Disaggregate-Sto-chastic Model of Store Choice," Journal of Marketing Research, February, pp 62-71.
Tang, Christopher S; Bell, David R and Ho, Teck-Hua (2001). "Store Choice and Shopping Behaviour: How Price Format Works," California Management Review, Vol43, No 2, Winter, pp 56-74.

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Swain,D. (2015). An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets. J. Corp. Gov. Insur. Risk Manag., 2(1), 141-153. https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm020110
D. Swain, "An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets," J. Corp. Gov. Insur. Risk Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 141-153, 2015. https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm020110
@research-article{Swain2015AnOD,
title={An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets},
author={Dindayal Swain},
journal={Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management},
year={2015},
page={141-153},
doi={https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm020110}
}
Dindayal Swain, et al. "An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets." Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management, v 2, pp 141-153. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm020110
Dindayal Swain. "An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets." Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management, 2, (2015): 141-153. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm020110
Swain D.. An Output Driven Analytical Construct on the Choice Criteria of Indian Consumers for Organized New Retail Outlets[J]. Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management, 2015, 2(1): 141-153. https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm020110
cc
©2015 by the author(s). Published by Acadlore Publishing Services Limited, Hong Kong. This article is available for free download and can be reused and cited, provided that the original published version is credited, under the CC BY 4.0 license.