Javascript is required
Apostolides, A. (2011). The growth of two small economies in the Great Depression: GDP estimation for Cyprus and Malta during the interwar period (1921-1938). MPRA. [Google Scholar]
Armaoğlu, F. (1988). Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi (1914-1980). Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası. [Google Scholar]
Armaoğlu, F. (2010). Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi. İstanbul: Alkım Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
Arslan, L. (2022). Osmanlı’ dan erken cumhuriyet’e türk-ingiliz ticari ilişkileri. Mav. Atl., 10(2), 419–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bozkurt, İ. (2001). Kıbrıs’ın Tarihine Kısa Bir Bakış, Avrupa Birliği Kıskacında Kıbrıs Meselesi (Bugünü ve Yarını). Ankara: Kıbrıs Araştırmaları Merkezi Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
Darkot, B. (2001). “Kıbrıs”, İslam Ansiklopedisi. (VI. C.). Eskişehir: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. [Google Scholar]
Fidan, H. & Afşar, B. (2023). Ticaret savaşları ve dış ticaret. Nevşehir Hacı B.V. Üniv. SBE Derg., 13(1), 650–664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Flora, P. (1983). State, Economy and Society and Society in Western Europe 1815-1975. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. (1930). The Dominions Office and Colonial Office list for 1930. London: Waterlow & Sons. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. (1932). The Dominions Office and Colonial Office list for 1932. London: Waterlow & Sons. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1914). The Cyprus Gazette. Nicosia Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1915). The Cyprus Gazette. Nicosia Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1923). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1922. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_167 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1924). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1923. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_168 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1924). Cyprus Report for 1923. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1925). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1924. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_169 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1925). Cyprus Report for 1924. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1928). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1927. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_172 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1928). Cyprus Report for 1927. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1929). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1928. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_173 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1929). Cyprus Report for 1928. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1930). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1929. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_174 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1931). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1930. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_175 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1931). Cyprus Report for 1930. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1933). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1932. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_177 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1933). Cyprus Report for 1932. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1934). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1933. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_178 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1934). Cyprus Report for 1933. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1939). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1938. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_183 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1939). Cyprus Report for 1938. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Güran, T. (2014). İktisat Tarihi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Gürel, Ş. S. (1984). Kıbrıs Tarihi (1878-1960), Kolonyalizm, Ulusçuluk ve Uluslararası Politika (1.C.). Ankara: Kaynak Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Hill, G. (2016). Kıbrıs Tarihi Osmanlı ve İngiliz İdaresi Dönemi (1571-1948). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Hobsbawm, E. (1999). İmparatorluk Çağı 1875-1914. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
House of Common Parliamentary Papers. (1880). Cyprus No.2, Report by Her Majesty’s High Commissioner for the Year 1879. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. [Google Scholar]
Kaya, G. (2022). Osmanlı Tanzimat Dönemi ile Erken İngiliz Dönemi Arasında Kıbrıs Dış Ticareti Üzerine Bir Karşılaştırma Denemesi. J. Turk. Stud., 17(4), 785–799. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kazamias, G. A. & Panagiotou, M. (2016). Cyprus’ trade with the Levant, 1881-1946/7. In K. G. Yiangou A. & R. Holland (Eds.), The Greeks and the British in the Levant, 1800-1960s: Between Empires and Nations (pp. 111–122). London: Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
Keyder, Ç. (1993). Dünya Ekonomisi içinde Türkiye (1923-1929). Ankara:Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Kıllıoğlu, M. E. (2023). Birinci dünya savaşı ve kıbrıs. FSM İlm. Araşt. İns. Toplum Bilim. Derg., 21, 209–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Koç, R. (2022). Doğu Akdeniz’in yeni jeopolitiği ve Kıbrıs. Türk Dün. Araşt., 132(260), 13–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Koday, Z., Koday, S., & Kaymaz, Ç. K. (2017). Dünyadaki Bazı Önemli Boğazlar ile Kanalların Coğrafi Özellikleri ve Jeopolitik Önemleri. Atatürk Üniv. Sos. Bil. Ens. Derg., 21(3), 879–940. [Google Scholar]
Kütükoğlu, M. S. (2013). Osmanlı İngiliz İktisâdi Münâsebetleri (1580-1850). Ankara:Türk Tarih Kurumu. [Google Scholar]
Litman, S. (1926). The effects of the World War on trade. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., 127, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
Macrosty, H. W. (1932). The overseas trade of the United Kingdom, 1924-31. J. R. Stat. Soc., 95(4), 607–657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Macrosty, H. W. (1940). The overseas trade of the United Kingdom 1930-39. J. R. Stat. Soc., 103(4), 451–490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Meredith, D. (1975). The British government and colonial economic policy, 1919-39. Econ. Hist. Rev., 28(3), 484–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ogen, O. (2008). The economic lifeline of British Global Empire: A reconsideration of the historical dynamics of the Suez Canal, 1869-1956. Uluslar. Sos. Araşt. Derg., 1(5), 524–533. [Google Scholar]
Özçelik, F. (2023). Birinci dünya savaşı ve kıbrıs. İnönü Üniv. Ulus. Sos. Bil. Derg., 12(1), 38–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Sarınay, Y. (2000). Osmanlı İdaresinde Kıbrıs (Nüfusu, Arazi Dağılımı ve Türk Vakıfları). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Osmanlı Arşivi Daire Başkanlığı. [Google Scholar]
Satan, A. (2004). Yeni ingiliz belgeleri ışığında kıbrıs ve önemi. Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmalar, 6, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
T.C. (1943). The economic development of the British Colonial Empire. Bull. Int. News., 20(4), 139–145. [Google Scholar]
Tekeli, İ. & İlkin, S. (1977). 1929 Dünya Buhranında Türkiye’nin İktisadi Politika Arayışları. Ankara: Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
Twiss, T. (1885). Le Canal Maritime de Suez et la Commission Internationale de Paris. Bruxelles. [Google Scholar]
Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (1988). Osmanlı Tarihi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu. [Google Scholar]
Search
Open Access
Research article

A Historical Background of Foreign Trade in Cyprus (1923-1938)

sevgi korkmaz1*,
sadiye tutsak2
1
Vocational School of Health Services, Uşak University, 64100 Uşak,Turkey
2
Department of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Uşak University, 64100 Uşak, Turkey
Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies
|
Volume 9, Issue 4, 2023
|
Pages 449-467
Received: 11-09-2023,
Revised: 12-14-2023,
Accepted: 12-21-2023,
Available online: 12-30-2023
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 brought the strategic position of Cyprus to the international stage. The geopolitical position of the Mediterranean for world trade remains important today. The administration of Cyprus was left to Britain in 1878 with the Cyprus Convention signed between Britain and the Ottoman Empire. With the outbreak of World War I, Britain annexed Cyprus in 1915. Cyprus was given the status of a Crown Colony in 1925. During the war period, between 1915 and 1922, foreign trade of Cyprus reached the highest figures in its history. Cyprus was used as a military and commercial safe haven for British trade and allies. The post-war economic crises, especially the onset of the Great Depression in 1929, shook the world economy. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the economic crises of the period 1923-1938 on foreign trade of Cyprus and whether the wartime development continued or not. The share of the UK and other countries in foreign trade and the status of Cyprus in international foreign trade will be determined. In the study, first of all, the commercial data of Cyprus foreign trade for the period 1923-1938 will be organized and interpreted using statistical methods (tables and graphs). As a result of the study, it was determined that the period of 1923-1938 in Cyprus was a fluctuating period of decline and rise in foreign trade due to economic crises. In 1938, exports increased by 176% and imports by 110% compared to 1923. Despite the crisis, the geography of foreign trade of Cyprus expanded and the number of traded countries increased. The share of European countries in foreign trade increased. While Cyprus exports mineral products and food to Europe, it also became one of the new markets for products produced in Europe. It was also a transit island in international trade.

Keywords: Cyprus, Foreign, Trade, External, Export, Import, Re-export
JEL Classification: N14, N74, O52

1. Introduction

The Island of Cyprus is located in the northeast of the Eastern Mediterranean and the distance between Turkey and Cyprus is approximately 70 km. The distances to other countries are 100 km to Syria, 370 km to Egypt, 400 km to Rhodes and 800 km to the Greek coast. Cyprus is the third largest island in the Mediterranean after Sicily and Sardinia. Due to its geographical location and strategic importance, Cyprus has been an island where different states have struggled for dominance throughout history. In the historical process, Egypt, Hittites, Achaeans, Dorian, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Persians, Roman Empire, Arabs, Lusignans, Genoese, Venetian, Ottoman Empire and Britain dominated Cyprus (D​a​r​k​o​t​,​ ​2​0​0​1; B​o​z​k​u​r​t​,​ ​2​0​0​1).

The Ottoman Empire seized control of Cyprus, which was strategically located at a key point in the Eastern Mediterranean, in 1571 thanks to the expansion policy it pursued since its foundation. Then, the Turkish domination was established in the Eastern Mediterranean after Syria and Egypt were included in the Ottoman territories as well. After the conquest, Cyprus became a Beylerbeylik under the rule of Ottoman Empire (U​z​u​n​ç​a​r​ş​ı​l​ı​,​ ​1​9​8​8).

As the Ottoman Empire lost power due to internal and external reasons during the periods of regression and collapse, it began to remain outside the power centers that determined world politics in political and economic terms. During this period, important developments for world trade began to take place, especially after the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century.

Britain and other European countries pursued a policy of seeking cheap raw materials and finding new markets. As a result of technological developments, the introduction of steamships in maritime transportation accelerated, developed and increased the capacity of trade (K​e​y​d​e​r​,​ ​1​9​9​3). As world trade developed, Britain's share in international trade began to increase rapidly (H​o​b​s​b​a​w​m​,​ ​1​9​9​9).

One of the countries that Britain developed its imports and exports was the Ottoman Empire. The British Trade Agreement signed between Britain and the Ottoman Empire in Baltalimanı on August 16, 1838 increased trade between the two countries. While Britain's total foreign trade was 50 million pounds (£) in 1838, its foreign trade with the Ottoman Empire was £1.9 million and its share in the Ottoman foreign trade was 3.7%, Britain's trade was £135.9 million and its trade with the Ottoman Empire was £7.7 million, increasing its share to 5.6% in 1860 (K​ü​t​ü​k​o​ğ​l​u​,​ ​2​0​1​3).

In the second half of the 19th century, the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869, an important turning point for world maritime trade, led to a revival in the Eastern Mediterranean trade. The Suez Canal also increased the military and commercial importance of Cyprus (A​r​m​a​o​ğ​l​u​,​ ​2​0​1​0). In early 1870, Britain dominated about one-third of the world's total trade (G​ü​r​a​n​,​ ​2​0​1​4). In 1884, the number of ships passing through the Suez Canal was 3,284 and the total amount of cargo was 8,319,967,358 tons, while the number of British ships was 2472 and the amount of cargo they carried was 6,312,398,578 tons. The number of ships using the Suez Canal and 75% of the cargo carried belonged to Britain (T​w​i​s​s​,​ ​1​8​8​5). Cyprus became strategically important for Britain, a large colonial empire, as it was located on the maritime trade with India, one of its most important colonies, and the colonies in the Far East. With the existence of the Suez Canal, Egypt also came into England's sphere of interest.

The Ottoman Empire lost the 1877-1878 Ottoman-Russian War and signed the Treaty of Ayastefanos on March 3, 1878. Assessing the situation after a heavy war defeat, Britain brought up a treaty guaranteeing the defense of Turkish territories against the Russians. As a result of the negotiations, the Cyprus Convention was signed between the Ottoman Empire and Britain on June 4, 1878 (A​r​m​a​o​ğ​l​u​,​ ​2​0​1​0; G​ü​r​e​l​,​ ​1​9​8​4). With this treaty, Cyprus, whose ownership would remain with the Ottoman Empire, was annually leased to Britain. Thus, the administration in Cyprus was transferred to Britain. Thus, the administration in Cyprus was transferred to Britain. As a result of the Ottoman Empire's entry into World War I on the side of Germany, Britain's unilateral annexation decision became a new turning point for Cyprus (S​a​r​ı​n​a​y​,​ ​2​0​0​0). As a result of Britain's unilateral annexation of Cyprus, the administration of the island completely passed to the British. This development deeply affected the Cypriot economy. The decision to annex Cyprus by Britain was published in the extraordinary issue of The Cyprus Gazette dated November 5, 1914. Due to the outbreak of war between Britain and the Ottoman Empire, the Convention of 1878, its annexes and the treaty were declared null and void and Cyprus was annexed and incorporated into British territory (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​1​4). The Lausanne Peace Treaty signed on July 24, 1923 at the end of World War I, included provisions regarding Cyprus. According to Article 20 of the treaty, Turkey accepted that it recognized the annexation of Cyprus to Britain, which was announced by the British Government on November 5, 1914. The Treaty of Lausanne was ratified by Britain on August 6, 1924. The British King George V signed the Letters Patent necessary to turn Cyprus into a Crown Colony. The Governor of Cyprus began to administer Cyprus as a British territory, just like the other British colonies. Cyprus became a British Crown colony on March 10, 1925 (H​i​l​l​,​ ​2​0​1​6). By capturing Cyprus and Egypt during and after World War I, Britain gained the dominance to ensure the security of the Mediterranean and Far East trade (Ö​z​ç​e​l​i​k​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

The Suez Canal became the most strategically and commercially important location for the British Empire for its trade in India, the Far East and Australia after its opening in 1869. For this reason, the Canal was called the jugular vein of the British Empire (O​g​e​n​,​ ​2​0​0​8). In fact, the lion's share of trade, especially goods, within the British Empire passed through the Suez Canal. The unification of the Mediterranean and the Red Sea with the Suez Canal is described as a revolution in world trade. This led to changes in maritime trade routes, international trade, foreign and military policies. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the effects of the Suez Canal on world trade and maritime trade routes. The canal is of considerable importance as it shortens the existing Far East trade route by 5100 miles.

Britain's Cyprus policy and its strategic importance were summarized in the memorandum entitled "The Future of Cyprus" prepared by Lord Curzon, who became Foreign Secretary on January 3, 1919. According to this memorandum, Cyprus was the key to the competitive struggle in the Eastern Mediterranean due to its location. Anatolian railroads extended from Europe to Egypt, Arabia and the Persian Gulf. The port of Iskenderun, which would be a possible French occupation zone in the event of the invasion of Anatolia, was the commercial exit point of Baghdad. France also had a desire to dominate Syria. In case the Italians established dominance in Antalya and Western Anatolia, Britain needed to balance the rivalry in the region. For these reasons, Britain saw Cyprus, located further east of Malta, as a naval base that would establish the balance. One of the remarkable points in Lord Curzon's memorandum is his prophecy for the future. He shared the view that in the last quarter of the century, the importance of Cyprus would increase much more and for this reason, strategically, they would not give up Cyprus. At the same time, Cyprus could be used as a submarine and air base and as a strong outpost in the Eastern Mediterranean in the event of war. The British Navy's views on the strategic importance of Cyprus were also included in the same memorandum. As a matter of course, the British Navy based in Malta protected the sea route to the Suez Canal from the east. In the event of another base in the Eastern Mediterranean, no other naval power would be able to establish effective and continuous control and dominance in this region except the British. Cyprus was also an important base for military operations in Anatolia. If Turkey managed to remain sovereign in Anatolia, its Near Eastern interests would be jeopardized. For this reason, Cyprus would continue to maintain its importance even in the future (S​a​t​a​n​,​ ​2​0​0​4).

Figure 1. Suez Canal and trade routes
Source: https://www.britishempire.me.uk/openingofsuezcanal.html
Figure 2. Empires and patterns of world trade (1880-1914)
Source: https://commons.princeton.edu/mg/empires-and-patterns-of-world-trade-1880-1914/

The purpose of the study is to examine the changes in Cyprus foreign trade between 1923 and 1938 as a British colony. In this context, the effects of the economic crisis after World War I and the Great Depression of 1929 on foreign trade of Cyprus (import, export, re-export, total trade) will be discussed, the countries of foreign trade will be determined, and whether European countries and other countries in search of raw materials and food in the crisis environment are involved in foreign trade, the share of Britain and its colonies in foreign trade and which colonies they were will be determined, the volume of foreign trade with the Far East and which countries they traded with, the products involved in foreign trade and whether there was a change will be determined, and a comparison of them in terms of Malta and Gibraltar's shipping and revenues will be made in this study.

The main data of the study will be the information on foreign trade in the colonial reports published annually by the Great Britain Colonial Office and the Cyprus Blue Book statistical yearbooks.

The methodology of the study is to organize and interpret the trade data of Cyprus foreign trade for the years 1923-1938 using statistical methods (tables and graphs). In the first part of the study, basic information on Cyprus foreign trade (imports, exports, total foreign trade) will be given and changes will be determined. Then, the ratio of foreign trade between Cyprus and the UK, British colonies and foreign countries to Cyprus foreign trade will be calculated as a percentage and the main countries of trade will be identified. In the second part, information on the classified products in foreign trade and the status of the main traded products in trade will be presented. In the interpretation of the statistical findings and results, the policies affecting Cyprus foreign trade and the effects of international developments on foreign trade will also be included. Shipping and finance information on Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar will be compared in the last part of the study. The main statistical data of the study will be the statistical data for the years 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938 in order to determine the information on foreign trade for the 1923-1938 period and to determine the changes in five-year periods.

The strategic position of the island of Cyprus, where the effect of international developments in military, political and commercial terms can be seen simultaneously, has not changed throughout its history. World trade, British trade and British colonial policies affected trade in Cyprus during the period 1878-1938, from the end of the 19th century until World War II. This interaction will be seen in the developments during this period and in the literature on world trade, British trade and Cyprus trade.

2. Literature Review

Before the geographical discoveries, the Mediterranean was home to the most important sea routes for trade between Asia, Europe and Africa. Dominating the Mediterranean meant dominating trade. The importance of the Mediterranean for world trade increased even more with the opening of the Suez Canal. With the Strait of Gibraltar and the Suez Canal, the Far East was now closer for world trade. While the Mediterranean was an inland sea during the Ottoman Empire, it became the most important region for world maritime trade after 1869. The security of the Mediterranean and dominating this region was indispensable for trade. Since ancient times, Cyprus has been an important island where wars of dominance were fought in Mediterranean trade. The strategic importance of Cyprus increased even more after the opening of the Suez Canal due to its proximity to Egypt (K​o​ç​,​ ​2​0​2​2).

The Strait of Gibraltar is recognized as the key to Mediterranean trade. It is important for world trade as it is the entrance and exit gate to the Mediterranean and the shortest maritime route to the Far East through the Suez Canal (K​o​d​a​y​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​7). Gibraltar, which is closest to the Strait of Gibraltar, was strategically used as a military base by Britain for this reason. Gibraltar and the Maltese islands, which belonged to Britain before World War I, were important military bases administered by the governor. During World War I, Britain made its presence in Egypt and Cyprus permanent through unilateral annexation. Thus, it established dominance in Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus, which were strategic points in ensuring the security of maritime trade in the Mediterranean Region (K​ı​l​l​ı​o​ğ​l​u​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

The greatest war in human history deeply affected all countries and nations. After 1918, the damage of the war began to show itself. The war impoverished Europe and the European industry was shaken. Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire disintegrated. The breakaway nations from Russia and the newly emerging political map in the Middle East and Europe shattered all barriers. New mandates and protectorates were established in the Asian regions dominated by the Ottoman Empire. France's economy expanded, Germany's economy contracted by 13%. Imperialist states turned to backward countries for raw materials in order to strengthen their economies (L​i​t​m​a​n​,​ ​1​9​2​6). As a result of all these economic developments, in the period between the two major world wars (1923-1938), world trade was hit by economic crises.

The world economy continued to grow after the 1850s until World War I, except for some sudden and short-term crises. Thanks to technological advances, especially after the Industrial Revolution of 1876, the world economy began to grow rapidly. With the effect of the Great Crisis between 1929 and 1936, world economic growth did not stop but slowed down (H​o​b​s​b​a​w​m​,​ ​1​9​9​9). The treaties made by the states at the end of World War I deeply affected the economies of the defeated states (A​r​m​a​o​ğ​l​u​,​ ​1​9​8​8). After World War I, prices fell in international markets. In 1921, the first post-war economic crisis began. Between 1922 and 1925, there was a period of revival in the world economy. In 1926-1927, a period of stagnation was observed for some countries, while the world economy generally experienced a rapid development (T​e​k​e​l​i​ ​&​ ​İ​l​k​i​n​,​ ​1​9​7​7). Between 1929 and 1932, world trade decreased by 60% due to the negative effects of the Great Depression that began in late 1929. The policies implemented by states to protect their national markets and currencies against the negative effects of the world economy made economies closed inward (F​l​o​r​a​,​ ​1​9​8​3). In this period, oil became the favorite energy source with the use of motorized vehicles in industry and transportation. Middle East oil reserves were discovered. Thus, the Middle East became the new field of power dominance in trade. While the 1929 Great Depression affected developed and industrialized countries more, its effects on developing countries were more limited (F​i​d​a​n​ ​&​ ​A​f​ş​a​r​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

World trade was hit by economic crises in the period between the two major world wars (1923-1938). The effects of World War I and the Great Depression of 1929 caused deep economic shocks all over the world. The effects of the crisis also affected world trade, British trade, British colonial policies and the economies and foreign trade of the British colonies. The effects of the economic crisis reflected in foreign trade figures, particularly in Britain, America and European countries. Table 1, presents imports and domestic exports trade data of world 1924, 1930 and 1931. Britain's export growth, which began in 1923, continued to rise until 1929, although it decreased by the effect of the industrial war in 1926. In 1930, just after the Great Depression, Britain’s exports fell by 18%. In order to protect the depreciation of the pound, Britain went off the gold standard in the fall of 1931. One of the most serious decisions it took against the crisis was to abandon free trade in 1932. Britain tried to expand international trade by signing trade agreements with various countries. The most important of them was the Anglo-American Trade Treaty. Countries started to follow policies that restricted imports and encouraged exports (M​a​c​r​o​s​t​y​,​ ​1​9​4​0). According to Table 1, between 1929 and 1931, while Britain increased its share in imports in world trade from 18.3% in 1929 to 21.9% in 1931, it decreased its share in domestic exports from 13.2% in 1929 to 12.2% in 1931. While France increased its share in imports from 7.7% in 1929 to 9.3% in 1931, its share in exports rose slightly from 7.3% in 1929 to 7.7% in 1931. In this period, Germany increased its share in imports and exports in world trade. The United States is the country whose share in imports and exports decreased the most. These countries compete in world trade. About half of world trade is dominated by these countries. World trade imports and exports continued to fall in 1929, 1930 and 1931 (M​a​c​r​o​s​t​y​,​ ​1​9​3​2). With the effect of the Great Crisis between 1929 and 1936, world economic growth did not stop but slowed down (H​o​b​s​b​a​w​m​,​ ​1​9​9​9).

Table 1. World trade (1929-1931)

Imports

Domestic Exports

Country

1929

1930

1931

1929

1930

1931

United Kingdom

18.3 (15.4)

19.4

21.9

13.2 (10.9)

13.0

12.2

United States

14.9 (12.4)

12.7

11.8

19.3 (15.8)

17.7

15.3

Germany

10.8 (9.1)

10.3

9

12 (9.8)

13.4

14.7

France

7.7 (6.5)

8.6

9.3

7.3 (6)

7.8

7.7

Other Countries

48.3 (40.9)

49.0

48.0

48.2

48.1

50.1

All Countries

100 (84.3)

100

100

100

100

100

All Countries: £ Million

6.078

4.938

3.641

5.506

4.395

3.188

Source: M​a​c​r​o​s​t​y​,​ ​1​9​3​2

In this period, the measures taken by the UK against economic crises had different effects on foreign trade. The measures taken by the UK against economic crises had different effects on foreign trade. Table 2 presents imports, exports and re-exports trade data of British Overseas Trade for 1924, 1930 and 1931. Compared to the 1924 figures, imports and exports to India decreased. Imports to the colonies decreased, while exports and re-exports from the colonies increased. In the Dominions, imports decreased while exports increased. British imports to the colonies decreased in 1931 compared to 1924, while exports from the colonies increased in 1931. The share of foreign countries in British foreign trade rose slightly, with the largest increases in imports and re-exports to Europe and Russia. The country where imports decreased the most was the USA. Overall, 70% of imports were to foreign countries and 30% to British colonies. In terms of exports, the colonies accounted for about 40% and other countries for 60%.

In the inter-war period, Britain, struggling to cope with the economic crises, experienced a period of less pressure from the Imperial colonial administration and the colonies were freed. The main objectives of British colonial policy were, in short, the provision of raw materials essential for industrial development, the expansion of raw material fields to finance the expenditures of the Colonial Empire (especially administrative and defense expenditures), finding new markets for the raw materials they produced, and improving living standards in the colonies. In 1929, the British Government enacted the Colonial Development Act covering its colonies, protectorates and mandated territories. The aim of this law was to support and develop agriculture and industry in these regions. Economic development in the colonies would support the development of trade or industry and enhance the development in the United Kingdom. As a result of the 1929 Act, new arrangements were made by the British government in the 1930s to encourage economic development in the colonies. A fund of £1 million was created to be used for colonial development. The Colonial Development Advisory Committee (C.D.A.C.) was established to administer this fund and development plans. These efforts had positive effects in some colonies in 1935. Budgetary expenditures allocated to the fund peaked in 1933, and after 1935, expenditures to the fund declined. The fields most supported by the Development Fund's expenditures in the period 1929-1939 were Internal transport and communications (30%), Public health 16, Water supply and water power (10%), Mineral resources 9, Scientific research 7, agricultural development (6%), etc. (M​e​r​e​d​i​t​h​,​ ​1​9​7​5). Between 1929 and March 1939, the Colonial Development Fund provided a total of £7,908,988 in aid, of which 3,082,073 were loans and 4,826,915 grants. The Fund also financed infrastructure works, especially in the field of transportation (ports, railways and highways) (T​.​C​.​,​ ​1​9​4​3).

Table 2. British overseas trades (1924-1931)

Countries

Imports

Exports

Re-Exports

1924

1930

1931

1924

1930

1931

Self-Governing Dominions

19.01

18.67

19.51

23.55

24.59

25.47

15.43

17.78

19.53

India

6.17

4.89

4.26

11.31

9.28

8.30

0.80

1.48

1.25

Colonies, Possessions, and Protectorates

5.03

5.56

4.96

6.81

9.64

10.07

2.66

4.32

4.38

Total: British Countries

30.21

29.12

28.73

41.67

43.51

43.84

18.89

23.58

25.16

Europe and Soviet Rusya

31.74

39.41

42.62

30.79

32.27

34.27

57.41

56.30

55.29

United States

18.88

14.70

12.08

6.74

5.03

4.40

17.56

12.93

12.51

Rest of America

11.22

10.39

10.58

8.53

9.72

7.73

Africa

4.04

2.23

2.06

3.74

3.74

3.90

6.14

7.19

7.04

Asia

3.83

3.96

3.61

8.52

5.70

5.83

Rest of America

11.22

10.39

10.58

8.53

9.72

7.73

Polynesia, etc.

0.08

0.19

.032

0.01

0.03

0.03

Total:Foreign Countries

69.79

70.88

71.27

58.33

56.49

56.16

81.11

76.42

74.84

Total:All Countries £ Million

1.277

1.044

862

801

571

389

140

87

64

Source: M​a​c​r​o​s​t​y​,​ ​1​9​3​2

Cyprus and Malta, two important islands in the Eastern Mediterranean as British colonies, underwent a different economic transformation than other countries during and after World War I. The British Royal Navy in Malta, a British colony, and Britain's military expenditures in World War I boosted its trade, but it declined after the war. Foreign trade increased in Cyprus during World War I. Foreign trade increased in Cyprus during World War I. Britain's policies of balanced budget and non-intervention in the economy followed the increase in foreign trade (A​p​o​s​t​o​l​i​d​e​s​,​ ​2​0​1​1). According to a ten-year study of Cyprus' foreign trade between 1881 and 1931, Britain and Egypt were the main countries in the period 1881-1931. According to 1931 and 1946 figures, the main countries were Britain, Germany and France (K​a​z​a​m​i​a​s​ ​&​ ​P​a​n​a​g​i​o​t​o​u​,​ ​2​0​1​6). Following the transition to British rule, efforts were made to develop the Cyprus economy. The British administration carried out works such as the improvement of agricultural production, irrigation canals, road construction works, and the improvement of ports (K​a​y​a​,​ ​2​0​2​2).

Although there are few studies on foreign trade in Cyprus in the period 1923-1938, the following questions have never been answered or not answered sufficiently. What is the share of Britain and its colonies in foreign trade of Cyprus? Which British colonies and Cyprus trade with each other? Has there been any change after being the Crown Colony? Has there been a change in the volume of foreign trade between Cyprus and European countries and the main European countries? What is the status of shipping from Cyprus compared to shipping to Malta and Gibraltar, the other British bases in the Mediterranean? What is the distribution of imports, exports and re-exports in foreign trade of Cyprus? What is the situation of Britain, British colonies and foreign countries in foreign trade of Cyprus? What are the positive and negative effects of Britain's colonial policies on foreign trade figures? What are the main products and countries involved in foreign trade? What is the international dimension of foreign trade of Cyprus: the number of imports, exports, re-exports and their distribution by continent?

In the study, the general distribution of Cyprus foreign trade, the general country distribution of foreign trade, the general distribution of foreign trade products (export, import, re-export, main trade products and countries of trade) will be discussed under separate headings. Shipments and revenues to the island of Cyprus will be compared with Malta and Gibraltar, other British bases. Therefore, answers will be sought to the questions related to foreign trade of Cyprus.

3. Methodology

As the method of the study, in order to determine the developments in Cyprus foreign trade in the period 1923-1938, commercial data for the years 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938 will be presented statistically by preparing tables and graphs and descriptive content analysis will be made. The data to be presented in this context are as follows: The general distribution of Cyprus foreign trade (imports, domestic produce exports, re-exports, total exports, total foreign trade), the share of Britain, British colonies and foreign countries in Cyprus foreign trade, the main countries of trade and their share in foreign trade, the status of classified commercial products in foreign trade and the main commercial products.

4. Cyprus Foreign Trade (1923-1938)

4.1 General Distribution of Cyprus Foreign Trade (1923-1938)

Following the transition to British rule, various changes occurred in the social, economic, administrative and cultural structure of Cyprus. Foreign trade started to develop. Britain's imperialist and expansionist policies, the presence of its colonies, its dominance in world maritime trade, and the importance it attached to the Far East trade through the Suez Canal made the island of Cyprus a strategic commercial location. Cyprus foreign trade started to rise starting from 1878. In 1878, exports amounted to £157,328, imports to £177.65 and total foreign trade to £334,979. Foreign trade continued to rise throughout the war. After the end of the war, total foreign trade £2,294,324 in 1922. Between 1878 and 1922, imports were always higher than exports. During the period 1878-1922, imports and exports continued their upward trend (H​o​u​s​e​ ​o​f​ ​C​o​m​m​o​n​ ​P​a​r​l​i​a​m​e​n​t​a​r​y​ ​P​a​p​e​r​s​,​ ​1​8​8​0; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4).

Cyprus foreign trade fluctuated during the period 1923-1938 due to international political and economic developments, such as the economic problems following the end of World War I and the Great Depression of 1929. Imports decreased by £339,124 to £1,072,573 in 1923, compared to £1,411,69 in 1922, while exports increased by £22,522 to £893,733, compared to £871,211 in 1922. Imports decreased due to the excess imports in 1922, the decrease in the purchasing power of the people in 1923 and the existing stocks. The £22,522 increase in exports was due to the sudden demand for cereals. Exports were also affected by the purchase of livestock for shipment to Macedonia as a result of the population exchange under the Treaty of Lausanne and to areas of Greece where refugees from Anatolia had been resettled, and by good prices. Trade with Anatolia reopened. The impact of the war led to stagnation in local markets and a shortage of money (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4).

Cyprus exports exceeded imports in 1924. This was the first time since 1912 that the balance of trade was in favor of the island. In 1911 and 1912 exports exceeded imports, in 1913 and 1914 they were approximately equalized and from 1914 onwards imports exceeded exports. In 1920 the surplus increased to £868,307, while in 1923 the surplus was £178,840. In 1924 the improvement in exports was due to an increase in mineral exports, big carob crop and prices, a major commodity, and a high demand for livestock (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​5). Imports increased by 16% to £1,840,442 in 1928 compared to £1,585,940 in 1927. The value of exports in 1928 was £1,435,767, down 6.9% from £1,542,870 in 1927. Britain and its colonies accounted for 44.06% of imports, while other countries accounted for 6% or less. These countries are France (6.97%), Greece (6.15%), Germany (6.15%), Italy (5.79%), etc. While the UK and its colonies in total accounted for 12.16%, Italy 14.42%, Egypt 15.77%, the share of other countries was below 10% in exports. The trade deficit decreased to £43,000 in 1927, but increased again to £404,600 in 1928. While imports continued to rise, indicating an increase in purchasing power, exports, which had reached a record high in 1927, fell by only 6.9 percent. This was due to a decrease in the production of some crops and insufficient stocks. Positive developments in the Cyprus economy included the increased tourist traffic, an increase in mineral production, and labor expenditures by companies whose capital was located off-island (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​8).

Figure 3. Cyprus foreign trade (1922-1938)
Source: Cyprus Blue Book 1922, 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938

The fluctuations in Cyprus foreign trade (falls and rises) can be seen in Figure 3. During the Great Depression, which affected foreign trade, the value of imports in 1929 were £1,984,296, 7.2% higher than the previous year, while total value of exports was £1,635,742, and 13.9% higher than the previous year (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​0). In 1930, the value of imports fell by 28.3% to £1,422,604 and total value of exports by 25.5% to £1,218,321 as compared to the previous year (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​1).

The trade depression that shook the world in 1930 was also felt in Cyprus. Prior to the economic crisis, roads had already been rebuilt in Cyprus and efforts to extend loans to farmers had already been put in place, so the effects were less than expected. The total expenditure funds resulting from the loans granted did not exceed £50,000 (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​1). In the Cypriot foreign trade in 1932, due to the effect of the economic depression and extreme droughts, the quantity and value of imports and exports decreased. The exceptions were carob, wine, raw cotton, beans, peas, cheese and shelled almonds. Imports in 1932 amounted to £1,347,288. This is a decrease of 4.7% compared to imports of £1,414,101 in 1931. This decrease was due to the fact that in 1931, due to the civil unrest in Cyprus, road and port works, both military and infrastructural supplies were imported (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​3).

The world economic depression, the effects of the prolonged economic crisis, and local drought caused a further decline in Cypriot trade in 1933. Despite this, exports increased. The prices of commodities rose, as did their quantities and value. Imports amounted to £1,257,256 in 1933. The commodities with the largest price increases were bean oil, tobacco, mining machinery, motor oils and motor cars. In 1932 there was also an increase in the quantity of flour (wheat) imported and in the quantity of cotton goods. The main reasons for this were the prolonged drought, the abnormal cheapness of French and Italian flour, and competition from the Far East. The increase in the quantities of products was accompanied by depreciation in their value. Other products whose prices decreased as a result of the world economic depression were rice, timber, oil, gasoline and cement Imports from Britain, Australia and India decreased. The increase in imports was also seen in cheap flour from Italy and France. The decrease in imports from Turkey was mainly due to agricultural products (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4).

The values of imports for Cyprus were £1,419,162 in 1934, £1,481,941 in 1935, £1,485,716 in 1936, £2,219,429 in 1937 and £2,246,435 in 1938. The values of exports for Cyprus were £1,594,815 in 1936, £2,180,048 in 1937, and £2,478,256 in 1938, an increase of 13.68% (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​9).

The imports, exports of Cyprus products, re-exports of imported goods, total exports and total foreign trade figures for the years 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938 and their ratios in foreign trade are presented in Table 3. In order to evaluate 1923, 1922 was also added to the table. According to the foreign trade data analyzed in five-year periods since 1923, it is possible to make the following evaluations. The share of re-exports in foreign trade is generally very low. The lowest share of re-exports in foreign trade belongs to 1928 by 1.5% and the highest belongs 1933 by 3.8%. Total exports are largely composed of exports of Cyprus local products. Although imports are generally higher than exports, by 1938 exports exceed imports. The ratio of exports of Cyprus products in foreign trade ranged from a low of 37.7% in 1933 to a high of 50.3% in 1938. The ratio of total exports in foreign trade was lowest in 1933 with 41.6% and highest in 1938 with 52.2%. The ratio of imports to foreign trade was 58.3% in 1933 and the lowest in 1938 with 47.7% (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​3; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​9; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4).

According to Table 3, the changes in exports are as follows: the changes in exports are as follows: 2.3% increase in 1923 compared to 1922, 60.2% increase in 1928 compared to 1923, 37.3% decrease in 1933 compared to 1928, and 175.7% increase in 1938 compared to 1933. The changes in imports are as follows: 24% increase in 1923 compared to 1922, 71.7% increase in 1928 compared to 1923, 32% decrease in 1933 compared to 1928, and 80.3% increase in 1938 compared to 1933. According to our evaluation of the five-year periods, the most serious decrease occurred in 1933 due to the effects of the world economic crisis. After 1935, following a recovery process, it reached its highest level in 1938. After the economic crisis caused by the consequences of World War I and the Great Crisis of 1929, Cyprus trade started to increase and the foreign trade balance improved in 1938.

Table 3. Cyprus foreign trade and its distribution (1923-1938)

Value (Sterling)

Ratio in Foreign Trade %

1922

1923

1928

1933

1938

1923

1928

1933

1938

Re-Exports

63084

44853

50761

84030

88299

2.27

1.5

3.8

1.8

Domestic Exports for Cyprus Produce

812133

851202

1385215

814951

2390925

43.1

42.1

37.7

50.3

Total Exports

875217

896055

1435976

898981

2479224

45.4

43.6

41.6

52.2

Imports

1419107

1077395

1850338

1257368

2267204

54.5

56.3

58.3

47.7

Total Foreign Trade

2294324

1973450

3286314

2156349

4746428

100

100

100

100

Source: Cyprus Blue Book 1922, 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938
4.2 Distribution of Countries for Cyprus Foreign Trade (1923-1938)

In the early years of British rule, foreign trade was largely dominated by the Ottoman Empire and Egypt. Shares of the Ottoman Empire and Britain in Cyprus foreign trade in 1878 are as follows: Britain 14% and Ottoman Empire 50% in imports, Britain 3% and Ottoman 25% in exports (H​o​u​s​e​ ​o​f​ ​C​o​m​m​o​n​ ​P​a​r​l​i​a​m​e​n​t​a​r​y​ ​P​a​p​e​r​s​,​ ​1​8​8​0). Britain's share in imports increased from 3% in 1878 to 30% in 1922, and its share in exports increased from 14% in 1878 to 18.3% in 1922 (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​3). Following the outbreak of World War I, Britain declared the British colonies, Egypt, Cyprus, America, America, and the territories belonging to the Ottoman Empire, excluding all territories occupied by the Allies, as enemies (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​1​4). All kinds of trade with enemy states were banned (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​1​5). Following this decision, Britain, British colonies, allies and neutral states took part in the foreign trade of Cyprus in Cyprus Blue Book for the year 1915-1919. Following this decision, Britain, British colonies, allies and neutral states took part in the foreign trade of Cyprus.

The British colonies with which foreign trade was conducted between 1923 and 1938 are Aden, Australia, British (East-South-West Africa) Africa, British East, West Indies, India, Canada, Gibraltar, Malta, Mauritius, Palestine, Sudan, New Zealand, other British Possessions. Foreign countries are as follows: Europe countries: Austria, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, France, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Holland, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Yugoslavia. Asia countries: Baluchistan, Castellorizo, Caucasus, China, Dutch Possessions, Dodecanese, Japan, Persia, Philippine Islands, Syria, Turkey. Africa countries: Abyssinia, Belgian Possessions, Egypt, French Possessions, Italian Possessions. America countries: Argentine, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, United States (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​3; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​9; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​9).

Although Cyprus has a low commercial volume, it is on the routes of international maritime trade. The intercontinental distribution of the foreign countries with which it trades illustrates this fact. Although the number of countries is large, trade with some of them is so small that it can be considered symbolic. Nevertheless, its trade network expanded from Canada to Australia, from America to China, from Africa to Europe.

Table 4. British and foreign countries in Cyprus foreign trade (1923-1938)

Value (Sterling/£)

Percentage (%)

1923

1928

1933

1938

1923

1928

1933

1938

Imports

United Kingdom

314286

470997

400705

746916

29.1

25.4

31.8

32.9

Other Parts of British Empire

77949

348353

98372

362984

7.2

18.8

7.8

16

Foreign Countries

685160

1030988

758291

1157304

63.5

55.71

60.3

51

Total Imports

1077395

1850338

1257368

2267204

Domestic Exports from Cyprus

United Kingdom

205359

276926

222509

587321

24.1

19.9

27.3

24.5

Other Parts of British Empire

13482

33816

83431

107324

1.6

2.4

10.2

4.4

Foreign Countries

632361

1074473

505036

1691658

74.2

77.5

61.9

70.7

Total Domestic Exports

851202

1385215

814951

2390925

Re-Exports

United Kingdom

7145

6439

5127

7164

15.9

12.6

6.1

8.1

Other Parts of British Empire

3

1034

5901

6719

0.006

2

7.0

7.6

Foreign Countries

36380

43288

71794

74137

81.1

85.2

85.4

83.9

Total Re-Exports

44853

50761

84030

88299

Total Exports

United Kingdom

212504

283365

227636

594483

23.7

19.7

25.3

23.9

Other Parts of British Empire

14810

34850

89332

114043

1.6

2.4

9.9

4.5

Foreign Countries

668741

1117761

576830

1765795

74.6

77.8

64.1

71.2

Total Exports

896055

1435976

898981

2479224

Total Foreign Trade

United Kingdom

526790

754362

628341

1341399

26.6

22.9

29.1

28.2

Other Parts of British Empire

92759

383203

187704

477027

4.7

11.6

8.7

10.0

Foreign Countries

1353901

2148749

1355121

2923099

68.6

65.3

61.9

61.5

Total Foreign Trade

1973450

3286314

2156349

4746428

Source: Cyprus Blue Book, 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938
Figure 4. The UK and foreign countries in Cyprus foreign trade (1923-1938)
Source: Cyprus Blue Book, 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938

The data on foreign trade of Cyprus for the period 1923-1938 for the years 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938 were classified in 3 groups as Britain, British colonies and foreign countries, and Table 4 and Figure 4 were prepared.

The share of imports from the UK in total foreign trade is 29.1% in 1923, 25.4% in 1928, 31.8% in 1933 and 32.9% in 1938. The UK increased its share in Cypriot imports in the years 1933-1938, which first decreased due to the impact of the crisis. The lowest share of foreign countries in imports belongs to 1928 by 55.7% and the highest belongs to 1923 by 63.5%. Imports were mainly conducted from foreign countries. The lowest share of imports from British colonies belongs to 1923 by 7.2% and the highest belongs to 1928 by 18.8%. In the period 1923-1938, 19-24% of exports of Cyprus products were conducted to the UK, while 61-77% of exports were conducted to foreign countries and 1.6-10.2% to British colonies. Re-exports were conducted to foreign countries by 80%-85% and to the UK by 6.1%-15.92%. When we look at the distribution in the total foreign trade of Cyprus in the same period, Britain was 22%-29%, British colonies 4-11%, foreign countries 61%-68%.

Data on the main countries of import and export and their status in foreign trade are presented in Table 5. In the period 1923-1938, the ratio of exports to the UK to total exports was between 19% and 25%, while the ratio of imports from the UK and the colonies to Cyprus imports was between 36% and 48%.

Table 5. Major countries in Cyprus imports and exports (1923-1938) percentage (%)

Countries

Exports (%)

Imports (%)

1923

1928

1933

1938

1923

1928

1933

1938

United Kingdom

23.8

19.73

25.59

24.56

-

-

-

-

Other Parts of the British Empire

1.7

2.43

9.9

4.49

Total UK and Other Parts of the British Empire

36.6

44.06

39.69

48.48

Austria

-

-

-

-

1.9

1.03

1.16

6.24

Belgium

-

-

0.51

-

1.9

2.26

2

3.32

British India

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5.4

Czechoslovakia

-

-

-

-

-

3.37

1.52

-

Egypt

27.6

15.77

14.92

6.4

12.7

4.18

5.09

2.14

France

8.4

11,1

4.84

6.95

5.2

6.97

6.56

2.4

Germany

6.52

10.07

36.4

7.7

6.15

5.97

6.3

Greece

10.1

9.57

4.45

-

5.3

6.48

5.23

4.06

Holland

-

-

4.74

6.13

1.2

1.33

1.09

-

Italy

9.7

14.42

14.13

1.4

9.2

5.79

9.09

2.78

Japan

-

-

-

-

-

-

5,14

2.03

Palestine

-

-

-

2.21

-

-

-

-

Romania

-

-

0.61

-

-

3.16

6.45

7.96

Spain

2.1

2.37

0.35

-

-

-

-

-

Switzerland

0.9

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Turkey

1.5

0.83

0.07

-

2.3

1.39

1.83

-

United States in America (USA)

1.3

2.01

3.35

3.63

3.4

3.6

0.92

4.01

Other Countries

12.9

15.25

6.47

-

12.6

10.23

7.18

-

TOTAL

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Source: Colonial Reports Cyprus 1923, 1928, 1933, 1938

Compared to 1923, in 1938, the number of British colonies increased from 11 to 17 in Cyprus imports and from 13 to 19 in exports. The change in the number of importing countries by continent is as follows: the number of European countries increased from 18 to 27; in Asia from 10 to 13; in Africa from 2 to 7; and in the Americas from 3 to 13. The number of countries exporting from Cyprus also increased despite the crisis.

Compared to 1923, in 1938, the number of countries exported from Cyprus increased from 16 to 23 in Europe, from 8 to 9 in Asia, from 5 to 8 countries in America. However, in Africa, it dropped from 5 to 4. In international maritime trade, Cyprus is a port of call in the trade of 5 continents together with Australia, which is among its colonies (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​9; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​9).

Apart from these, the main export destinations were United Kingdom, other parts of the British Empire, Austria, Belgium, British India, Czechoslovakia, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Holland, Italy, Japan, Palestine, Romania, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, USA, other countries. The top three exporting countries were Britain and its colonies, Egypt and Greece in 1923, Britain and its colonies, Egypt and Italy in 1928 and 1933, and Britain, Germany and France in 1938. The main importing countries were Britain and its colonies, Egypt, Italy in 1923, Britain and its colonies, France, Germany in 1928 and 1933, and Britain and its colonies, Austria, Greece in 1938 (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​9; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​9). The main import destinations were the UK and its colonies, Egypt and Italy in 1923 (71.2%); the UK and its colonies, France and Germany in 1928 and 1933; and the UK and its colonies, Austria and Greece in 1938.

Between 1924 and 1936, imports decreased from 17.7% to 6.6% and exports decreased from 14.7% to 5.4% in Turkish-British foreign trade. Despite Britain's best efforts, Germany, with which it competed, developed its foreign trade with Turkey. A Trade and Maritime Agreement was signed between Turkey and the UK in 1930. In 1936, the barter agreement between Turkey and Germany was also concluded with the UK. From this date onwards, Britain's share in Turkey's trade began to increase. On October 29, 1936, the Turkish-British Comptoir Agreement was signed. In addition, the two countries agreed to continue their commercial relations according to the kliring system. Despite these developments in Turkish-British trade relations, imports and exports between Turkey and the UK continued to decline between 1924 and 1938. The volume of foreign trade between Cyprus and Turkey was also very low in the same period. Competition between Germany and the United Kingdom is observed in Cyprus foreign trade. International foreign relations and commercial agreements change the direction and volume of trade (A​r​s​l​a​n​,​ ​2​0​2​2).

4.3 Distribution of Products for Cyprus Foreign Trade (1923-1938)

Cyprus economy is based on agriculture and animal husbandry. There are also mining products. The Cyprus Asbestos Company is located near Troodos. The Cyprus Mines Corporation produced about 50,000 tons of cupriferous iron pyrites in 1923 and exported £60,000 worth of products. The Cyprus Sulphur and Copper Company has an iron and copper pyrite processing concession at Lymni in the Paphos area. It also signed a lease for the exploitation of magnesite deposits on the Akamas peninsula (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4).

The amounts of Cyprus trade products classified by group and their share in foreign trade between 1923 and 1938 are given in Table 6.

Information about the products listed under commercial products is given below.

Principal articles imported into Cyprus, during 1923 to 1928:

Class I- Food, drink and tobacco: Animals living, beans and peas, beer, ale and all other malt liquors galls, biscuits and bread, butter, cheese, cocoa, chocolate, chicory, coffee, corn, barley, oats, vetches, wheat, bran, wheat, meal or flour, oil of olive, rice, spirits of all sorts, spirituous compounds, liqueurs, tea, tobacco unmanufactured (Tumbeki), Tumbeki or Persian Tobacco, cigar, cigarettes and snuff, wine, sparkling in bottle galls. The top five products in this group are: Tobacco (Tumbeki), sugar, flour and coffee.

Class II- Raw materials and articles mainly unmanufactured: Coal, copper sheets, bottoms, bars and nails, drugs (not medicine), hides and skins, iron, pig, iron bars, oil of linseed oil, mineral, lubricating, petroleum, steel, timber, tin, bars and ingots, tin plates, zinc.

Class III- Articles wholly or mainly manufactured: Arms and ammunition (guns and pistols, blasting powder, dynamite, cartridges, caps and fireworks, gunpowder, shot), books, cotton manufactures, cotton yarn and thread, iron and steel manufactures, machinery, parts, soap, perfumed or toilet, stores government and military, woolen manufactures etc.

Class IV-Miscellaneous and unclassified articles: Animals, living (horses, monkeys), other articles (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​4;G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​2​9; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4; G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​9).

Table 6. Products in Cyprus foreign trade (1923-1938)

Products Groups

Value (Sterlin)

Percentage (%)

1923

1928

1933

1938

1923

1928

1933

1938

Imports

Class 1: Food, drink and tobacco

263080

537062

409492

478272

24.4

29

32.5

21.09

Class 2: Raw materials and articles mainly

124496

232257

90722

226707

11.5

12.5

7.2

9.9

Class 3: Articles wholly or mainly manufactured

684221

1068902

756513

1539787

63.5

57.7

60.1

67.9

Class 4: Miscellaneous and unclassified articles

488

1490

5

612

0.04

0.08

0.02

0.02

Total

1077395

1850338

1257368

2267204

Domestic Produce Exported

Class 1: Food, drink and tobacco

502845

631191

417419

717176

59.0

45.5

51.2

29.9

Class 2: Raw materials and articles mainly

287729

691770

330182

1584320

33.8

49.9

40.5

66.2

Class 3: Articles wholly or mainly manufactured

27933

38078

30423

64554

3.2

2.4

3.73

2.6

Class 4: Miscellaneous and unclassified articles

32695

24176

36543

24875

3.8

1.7

4.4

1.0

Total

851202

1385215

814951

2390925

Re-Exports

Class 1: Food, drink and tobacco

3826

1565

539

1953

8.5

3.08

0.6

2.2

Class 2: Raw materials and articles mainly

5362

1398

1072

370

11.9

2.7

1.2

0.4

Class 3: Articles wholly or mainly manufactured

33343

46500

60010

84890

74.3

91.6

71.4

96.1

Class 4: Miscellaneous and unclassified articles

0

1089

0

0

0

2.1

0

0

Total

44853

50761

84030

88299

Source: Cyprus Blue Book, 1923, 1928, 1933,1938

In Figure 5, in the period 1923-1938, Class III had a share between 57 and 67% in imports, while Class I had a share between 21% and 32%. As seen in Class 3, the lowest level of imports is in 1923. Imports increased in 1928 before decreasing again in 1933. The year with the highest value of imports is 1938.

Principal articles of domestic produce exported from Cyprus, during 1923 to 1938:

Class I- Animals, living (oxen, sheep, swine, poultry, goats), carobs, cheese, barley, wheat, fruit (grapes, lemons and oranges, pomegranates, raisins, salt, spirit, vegetable (onions, potatoes), vinegar, wines (Command aria), tobacco unmanufactured.

Class II- Aniseed, asbestos, cotton, cotton seed, flax, hides and skins, linseed, magnesite, ore, pyrites, silk cocoons, sponges, terra umbra, terre verte, wool.

Class III- Cordage and twine, cotton manufactures, gypsum, leather (boots and shoes), etc.

Class IV- Animals, living (donkey, camels, horses, mules).

As seen in Figure 6, between 1923 and 1938, Class I accounted for 29%-59% and Class II accounted for 33%-66% in exports of Cyprus local products.

Re-exports are conducted in very low quantities in Cyprus foreign trade. Between 1923 and 1938, Class III accounted for 71-96% of Cyprus re-exports.

Principal articles re-exported from Cyprus, during the years 1923 to 1938:

Class I- Wheat, meal or flour, tobacco.

Class II- Brass and copper, coal, iron.

Class III- Cotton manufactures, leather, stores government and military.

Class IV- Silk-worm eggs.

Amounts and quantities of the principal export products from Cyprus as of 1933 are:

1- Pyrites 209.970 tons, £195.779.

2- Carobs, wholly 26.507 tons, £89.268, carobs ground 6.721 tons, £28.661.

4- Fruit (lemons, oranges, raisins), £96185.

5- Wine 1.128.094 gallon, £48.594.

6- Potatoes: 227.571 sacks, £ 46.978.

7- Asbestos: 4567 tons, £44.088.

8- Animals living: donkeys 1394, £4.491; mules 1643, £30.684; oxen 2.675, £26743 total value £61.918.

Figure 5. Classified product distribution of Cyprus Imports (1923-1938)
Source: Cyprus Blue Book, 1923, 1928, 1933,1938
Figure 6. Classified product distribution of Cyprus local product exports (1923-1938)
Source: Cyprus Blue Book, 1923, 1928, 1933,1938

In 1933, carob, oranges, raw silk and wine were exported to the United Kingdom; potatoes, lemons, oranges and raw cotton were exported to Greece; pyrite, carob, oranges and raisins were exported to Germany; pyrite and carob were exported to the Netherlands; and asbestos and wool were exported to the United Statescarob, oranges, raw silk and wine were exported to the United Kingdom; potatoes, lemons, oranges and raw cotton were exported to Greece; pyrite, carob, oranges, raisins, pyrite and carob were exported to Germany; pyrite and carob were exported to the Netherlands; and asbestos and wool were exported to the United States. The countries and main products imported were wheat flour from British India and Australia, tobacco leaves from Greece, machinery from the USA, iron rods from Belgium, silk products from France, oil, gasoline and timber from Romania, mining machinery from Germany (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​4).

Amount of main export products and the main countries to which they are exported as of 1938 are:

1- Cupreous concentrates: £768.247 (Germany, and USA).

2- Cupreous pyrites: £488.593 (Holland, Germany, France, Romania, Italy, Belgium, USA).

3- Carobs: £293.051 (United Kingdom).

4- Citrus fruit: £100.874 (United Kingdom and Scandinavian countries).

5- Asbestos: £88.291 (USA, Denmark, United Kingdom and Sweden).

6- Wine: £1.596.790 (Egypt, United Kingdom, Malta and Sudan).

Other export products are potatoes, metallic residues, animals living and wool respectively. The main products exported to the United Kingdom are carobs and asbestos (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​.​ ​C​o​l​o​n​i​a​l​ ​O​f​f​i​c​e​,​ ​1​9​3​9).

Raw materials in Cyprus exports consisted of raw materials needed by Europe. Industrializing European countries produced 58% of pig iron and 56% of steel. Europe produced 70% of the world's cotton spindles and 75% of the world's woolen spindles. These products produced in Europe were essential for the industrialization of other countries. The number of cotton spindles, which was more than 10 million in Europe, Brazil and China, India and Japan, the Far East countries, in 1913, reached 18 million in 1924. In the weaving industry, the number of looms in India and Japan reached 120 thousand in 1913 and 200 thousand in 1922. Europe needed raw materials to sustain its industrial sector and food for the population. The main products were tin, copper, timber, wheat, cotton, wool. Undeveloped countries needed technology and industrial products; however, Europe needed raw materials and food. 64% of world trade therefore passed through Europe before World War I (L​i​t​m​a​n​,​ ​1​9​2​6). These are the reasons for the predominance of European countries in Cyprus exports. Cupreous concentrates, cupreous pyrites, asbestos, which Europe was looking for, were the products that were produced and exported in Cyprus during this period. Food products and live animals were also indispensable export products. Cyprus was also among the new markets for goods produced in Europe (L​i​t​m​a​n​,​ ​1​9​2​6).

5. Cyprus, Malta, Gibraltar Shipping and Finance (1923-1938)

Britain's three military bases in the Mediterranean are Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar. Malta and Gibraltar, despite their small size, are silent protectors of international maritime trade, especially British trade, with the presence of the British army. The shipments from the ports of Cyprus foreign trade with Malta and Gibraltar will be compared. That being said, British shipments, shipments with other countries, total shipments and finance (shipping) information will be compared in the three regions.

Gibraltar is 4 or 5 miles from the Bay of Gibraltar. Gibraltar is a narrow peninsula running south from the southwest coast of Spain. Its length is 22 miles and its greatest width is 2 miles. It is a free port, an extension of trade between Britain and the Arab states in North Africa. The British navy has positions at three different points (north, detached and south). Gibraltar came under British rule in 1713 with the Treaty of Utrecht. British rule continued with the Treaty of Versailles in 1783. Gibraltar's main foreign trade products are spirits, beer, tobacco, and motor spirits. The island's revenues are derived from customs fees, license taxes and rental income from the buildings used by the British administration. The presence of the British army and navy has an important place in its economy. After September 12, 1922, Gibraltar was governed by the Governor, who was also the garrison commander. It is of strategic importance, used by Britain as a military base to ensure the security of trade routes (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​,​ ​1​9​3​0).

The island of Malta is located in the Mediterranean Sea. It is 58 miles from Sicily, 80 miles from Syracuse and 142 miles from Reggio. It is 180 miles from Africa. Malta is about 17 miles long and 9 miles wide. Although Malta is a small island, it is an important part of the maritime trade in the Mediterranean trade, especially Tunis, Algeria and Italy. British rule in Malta began in 1800. With the 1814 Treaty of Paris, it was included in the territory of the British Kingdom. Britain maintains a military base in Malta, which it sees as strategic for the security of Mediterranean trade and sea routes (G​r​e​a​t​ ​B​r​i​t​a​i​n​,​ ​1​9​3​2).

Table 7. Total shipping and British shipping to Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar (1923-1938)

Shipping Rate of Change Compared to Previous Year %

Cyprus

Malta

Gibraltar

British

Tonage

%

Total

Tonage

%

British

Tonage

%

Total

Tonage

%

British

Tonage

%

Total

Tonage

%

1922-1923

-2.86

-4.71

16.91

19.62

-11

-7.64

1923-1928

205.52

101.72

-0.85

1.73

19

12.93

1928-1933

19.25

58.19

19.92

13.24

35

67.06

1933-1938

-0.95

3.78

8.51

16.57

24

35

Shipping British and Other Countries (percentage %)

Cyprus

Malta

Gibraltar

British

Tonage

%

Other

Tonage

%

British

Tonage

%

Other

Tonage

%

British

Tonage

%

Other

Tonage

%

1923

22.97

77.03

49.47

50.53

57.43

42.57

1928

34.79

65.21

48.22

51.78

60.73

39.27

1933

26.22

73.78

51.06

48.94

49.08

50.09

1938

25.03

74.97

47.53

52.47

44.91

55.09

Source: Colonial Office List, 1930, 1932, 1936, 1940
Figure 7. Total shipping and British shipping to Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar (1923-1938)
Source: Colonial Office List, 1930, 1932, 1936, 1940

The island of Cyprus is better off than Malta and Gibraltar in terms of agriculture, farming, animal husbandry, minerals and foreign trade resources. However, the presence of the British army in Malta and Gibraltar also affected shipping. The amount of transportation in Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar and the amount of cargo carried by the British ships are given in Figure 7. According to these figures, Table 7 shows the percentage of total tonnage and the amount of cargo carried by British ships compared to the previous period. The percentage of British ships in total tonnage is also calculated and given in the same table.

The total tonnage of shipments to Gibraltar was higher than to Malta and Cyprus in the period 1923-1938. The total tonnage of Gibraltar increased by 12.93% in 1928 compared to 1923, 67.06% in 1933 compared to 1928, and 35% in 1938 compared to 1933. The amount of cargo carried by British ships in Malta Island increased by 19% in 1928 compared to 1923, 35% in 1933 compared to 1928, and 24% in 1938 compared to 1933. While the share of British ships in total cargo was at its highest 60% in 1928, this rate decreased to 44.9% in 1938. The total amount of transported cargo increased by 154% in 1938 compared to 1923.

In 1928, the total amount of cargo in shipping on Malta Island decreased by 1.73% compared to 1923, while in 1933 it increased by 13.24%. It continued to increase by 16.57% in 1938 compared to 1933. The amount of cargo carried by British ships in Malta transportation increased by -0.85% in 1928 compared to 1923, by 19.92% in 1933 compared to 1928, and by 8.51% in 1938 compared to 1933. The total amount of cargo carried increased by 34% in 1938 compared to 1923.

The total amount of cargo of the Island of Cyprus by shipping increased by 101.72% in 1928 compared to 1923, 58.19% in 1933 and 3.78% in 1938 compared to 1933. While the amount of cargo carried by British ships increased by 205.52% in 1928 compared to 1923, by 19.25% in 1933 compared to 1928, it decreased by -0.95% in 1938 compared to 1933. The total amount of cargo carried increased by 219% in 1938 compared to 1923.

As a result, half or more of the Gibraltar and Malta cargo was carried by British ships. The amount of cargo carried by British ships in the Cyprus cargo varied between 22% and 34% of the total cargo. The share of non-British countries in foreign trade of Cyprus was 65%-77%. Shipping increased in all three countries during the period 1923-1938. The only exception is Malta, where the amount of cargo carried by British ships in 1933 was very low compared to 1928.

The financial situation of Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar is given in Figure 8. When the revenues for the years 1923-1938 are analyzed in five-year periods, there was an increase in all three countries. Gibraltar had the lowest income and Malta the highest. Although Gibraltar received the highest amount of cargo in shipping, it had the lowest income. This can be explained by the British military presence. Revenues of Cyprus Island increased by 80% in 1938 compared to 1923. Revenues of Malta Island increased by 55.8% in 1938 compared to 1923. However, Gibraltar increased its income by 38% in 1938 compared to 1923.

Comparing the expenditure situation of the three countries in 1938 with 1923, Cyprus experienced an increase of 55.83%, Malta 83% and Gibraltar 19%. Cyprus revenues were higher than expenditures in 1928-1938. The income-expenditure situation in Malta and Gibraltar appears to be balanced despite small differences.

Figure 8. Income and expenditure situation of Cyprus, Malta and Gibraltar (1923-1938)
Source: Colonial Office List 1930, 1932, 1936, 1940

6. Conclusions

After the transition from Ottoman rule to British rule, the volume of Cyprus foreign trade increased between 1878 and 1914. As a result of the Ottoman Empire's support for Germany in World War I, Britain unilaterally annexed the island of Cyprus. Following the annexation, trade with enemy states, including the Ottoman Empire, was cut off. While foreign trade did not decline despite the war, it reached the highest figures of the period 1878-1914. During the war period, the share of imports was higher than exports. Britain, British colonies and allied states dominated trade. Neutral countries were also allowed to trade in Cyprus. Therefore, the number of trading countries increased during the war period. With the Treaty of Lausanne signed in 1923, the annexation decision of Cyprus by Britain was officially recognized. In 1925, Cyprus became a Crown Colony and came under British colonial rule. In 1923, exports decreased by 2% and imports by 24% as compared to 1922.

In the aftermath of World War I, which affected the whole world, new international treaties were concluded and borders and political maps changed with the newly established states and colonies after the disintegration of states. Europe became poorer. Country economies contracted. Britain, which has an important place in world trade, is among the countries affected by the crisis. After the Great Depression of 1929, the economic crisis deepened. Britain fought the crisis with new commercial policies at home and in its colonies. Increasing the number of trading countries and the volume of trade, increasing exports, decreasing imports, and providing the necessary raw materials for industry by concluding international trade agreements were the priority policies. Funds were created to contribute to the economic growth of its colonies. In Cyprus, which was a British Crown Colony, infrastructure works (ports, highways, etc.), improvement works in agriculture, increasing production in mines, etc. prevented the effect of economic crises from being greater.

The effects of the crisis were less pronounced in Cyprus in the period 1924-1929. Despite ups and downs with slight declines, exports exceeded imports in 1924. Foreign trade growth continued to rise until 1929. Cyprus exports decreased by 26% and imports decreased by 28% in 1930 after the Great Depression of 1929. In 1938, compared to 1923, exports increased by 176% and imports increased by 110%. Local and global developments affecting foreign trade can be outlined as follows: Decrease in the purchasing power of the population, rising prices, stagnation in the markets, decrease in crops as a result of drought, competition for some products in international markets, decrease in imports from the UK, Australia and India, sudden demands, abundant and productive agricultural products during the period when there was no drought affected foreign trade positively or negatively. Imports and exports were almost equal in 1938. The increase in foreign trade was driven by the increase in the number of countries, the diversity of commercial products and price increases. The foreign trade balance became more balanced in 1938.

In the period 1923-1938, exports to the UK were 19%-25%, exports to British colonies were 1.6-9.9%, exports to foreign countries were 64%-77%; imports from the UK were 25%-32%, imports from British colonies were 7%-18%, imports from foreign countries were 51%-63%.

Compared to 1923, in 1938, the number of British colonies increased from 11 to 17 in Cyprus imports and from 13 to 19 in exports. The change in the number of importing countries by continent is as follows: the number of European countries increased from 18 to 27; in Asia from 10 to 13; in Africa from 2 to 7; and in the Americas from 3 to 13. The number of countries exporting from Cyprus also increased despite the crisis.

Compared to 1923, in 1938, the number of countries exported from Cyprus increased from 16 to 23 in Europe, from 8 to 9 in Asia, from 5 to 8 countries in America. However, in Africa, it dropped from 5 to 4. In international maritime trade, Cyprus is a port of call in the trade of 5 continents together with Australia, which is among its colonies. While the number of importing countries was 44 in 1923, it increased to 77 in 1938. While the number of exporting countries was 47 in 1923, it increased to 63 in 1938. Although the share of some countries in foreign trade is so small as to be symbolic, it is important in terms of indicating the international dimension of trade.

Apart from the UK, the main export destinations in 1923 were Egypt and Greece. In 1928 and 1933, England and its colonies, Egypt and Italy were in the top three. In 1938, England, Germany and France were at the forefront of foreign trade. The main importing countries were England and its colonies, Egypt and Italy in 1923; England and its colonies, France and Germany in 1928 and 1933; and England and its colonies, Austria and Greece in 1938. The share of other countries in imports is below 10%. As the number of countries engaged in foreign trade increased, the number of products also increased accordingly. Main exported products were pyrites, carobs, fruit (lemons, oranges, raisins), wine, asbestos, potatoes, cheese, animals living (donkeys, mules, oxen), cupreous concentrates, cupreous pyrites, zinc ore, chromium ore, iron drums. Terra umbra, etc. Main imported products were coffee, wheat, wheat flour, tobacco (Tumbeki), asphalt and bitumen, petroleum, timber, etc.

The policy of European countries to meet the raw material and food needs of their industries and to find new markets for their own products also had an impact on foreign trade of Cyprus. The minerals of Cyprus increased production and these raw materials constituted the most important part of exports. Malta and Gibraltar, the other two British colonies in the Mediterranean, which were geopolitically and strategically located in the same region as Cyprus, increased their maritime transportation between 1923 and 1938 despite the economic crisis. The revenues of the three countries also increased. In financial terms, Cyprus increased its revenues the most. From 1928 onwards, the island's revenues exceeded its expenditures. Gibraltar was the country with the highest level of shipping but the lowest income. It is possible to say that the shipments were military rather than commercial. Between 40% and 60% of the shipments were made by British ships. Malta is a country whose shipments increased with the British military presence. Half of Malta's shipments were also made by British ships. In these two countries, it can be said that military shipments were carried out more than commercial shipments. The share of British ships in Cyprus shipping varied between 1/3 and 1/4. Approximately 70% of the shipping was carried out by foreign ships. Countries from almost all continents took part in trade. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Cyprus Island was more commercially integrated into the international shipping. About 30% of foreign trade of Britain was carried out with its colonies. Policies were created to support the colonies to improve the British economy. Although Cyprus received little in the way of credit and support, it increased its foreign trade in the face of the economic crisis.

As a conclusion, while Cyprus foreign trade followed a course of ups and downs despite the economic crises in the period 1923-1938, its geography expanded to America, Africa, Australia, Europe and Asia. The number of countries of foreign trade increased rapidly. As a result of the policies pursued under the British colonial administration, Cyprus foreign trade reached new markets for imports, exports and re-exports. By 1938, Cyprus foreign trade was integrated into international trade.

Data Availability

The data used to support the research findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This paper is a part of the author’s PhD dissertation, and the study is prepared based on the doctoral thesis titled "Cyprus Foreign Trade in British Documents (1878-1960)".

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
Apostolides, A. (2011). The growth of two small economies in the Great Depression: GDP estimation for Cyprus and Malta during the interwar period (1921-1938). MPRA. [Google Scholar]
Armaoğlu, F. (1988). Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi (1914-1980). Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası. [Google Scholar]
Armaoğlu, F. (2010). Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi. İstanbul: Alkım Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
Arslan, L. (2022). Osmanlı’ dan erken cumhuriyet’e türk-ingiliz ticari ilişkileri. Mav. Atl., 10(2), 419–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bozkurt, İ. (2001). Kıbrıs’ın Tarihine Kısa Bir Bakış, Avrupa Birliği Kıskacında Kıbrıs Meselesi (Bugünü ve Yarını). Ankara: Kıbrıs Araştırmaları Merkezi Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
Darkot, B. (2001). “Kıbrıs”, İslam Ansiklopedisi. (VI. C.). Eskişehir: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. [Google Scholar]
Fidan, H. & Afşar, B. (2023). Ticaret savaşları ve dış ticaret. Nevşehir Hacı B.V. Üniv. SBE Derg., 13(1), 650–664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Flora, P. (1983). State, Economy and Society and Society in Western Europe 1815-1975. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. (1930). The Dominions Office and Colonial Office list for 1930. London: Waterlow & Sons. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. (1932). The Dominions Office and Colonial Office list for 1932. London: Waterlow & Sons. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1914). The Cyprus Gazette. Nicosia Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1915). The Cyprus Gazette. Nicosia Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1923). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1922. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_167 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1924). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1923. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_168 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1924). Cyprus Report for 1923. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1925). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1924. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_169 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1925). Cyprus Report for 1924. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1928). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1927. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_172 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1928). Cyprus Report for 1927. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1929). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1928. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_173 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1929). Cyprus Report for 1928. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1930). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1929. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_174 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1931). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1930. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_175 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1931). Cyprus Report for 1930. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1933). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1932. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_177 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1933). Cyprus Report for 1932. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1934). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1933. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_178 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1934). Cyprus Report for 1933. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Great Britain Colonial Office. (1939). Cyprus Blue Book for the Year 1938. Nicosia: Government Printing Office. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2021714/items_show_183 [Google Scholar]
Great Britain. Colonial Office. (1939). Cyprus Report for 1938. London: H.M.S.O. [Google Scholar]
Güran, T. (2014). İktisat Tarihi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Gürel, Ş. S. (1984). Kıbrıs Tarihi (1878-1960), Kolonyalizm, Ulusçuluk ve Uluslararası Politika (1.C.). Ankara: Kaynak Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Hill, G. (2016). Kıbrıs Tarihi Osmanlı ve İngiliz İdaresi Dönemi (1571-1948). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Hobsbawm, E. (1999). İmparatorluk Çağı 1875-1914. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
House of Common Parliamentary Papers. (1880). Cyprus No.2, Report by Her Majesty’s High Commissioner for the Year 1879. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. [Google Scholar]
Kaya, G. (2022). Osmanlı Tanzimat Dönemi ile Erken İngiliz Dönemi Arasında Kıbrıs Dış Ticareti Üzerine Bir Karşılaştırma Denemesi. J. Turk. Stud., 17(4), 785–799. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kazamias, G. A. & Panagiotou, M. (2016). Cyprus’ trade with the Levant, 1881-1946/7. In K. G. Yiangou A. & R. Holland (Eds.), The Greeks and the British in the Levant, 1800-1960s: Between Empires and Nations (pp. 111–122). London: Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
Keyder, Ç. (1993). Dünya Ekonomisi içinde Türkiye (1923-1929). Ankara:Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
Kıllıoğlu, M. E. (2023). Birinci dünya savaşı ve kıbrıs. FSM İlm. Araşt. İns. Toplum Bilim. Derg., 21, 209–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Koç, R. (2022). Doğu Akdeniz’in yeni jeopolitiği ve Kıbrıs. Türk Dün. Araşt., 132(260), 13–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Koday, Z., Koday, S., & Kaymaz, Ç. K. (2017). Dünyadaki Bazı Önemli Boğazlar ile Kanalların Coğrafi Özellikleri ve Jeopolitik Önemleri. Atatürk Üniv. Sos. Bil. Ens. Derg., 21(3), 879–940. [Google Scholar]
Kütükoğlu, M. S. (2013). Osmanlı İngiliz İktisâdi Münâsebetleri (1580-1850). Ankara:Türk Tarih Kurumu. [Google Scholar]
Litman, S. (1926). The effects of the World War on trade. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci., 127, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
Macrosty, H. W. (1932). The overseas trade of the United Kingdom, 1924-31. J. R. Stat. Soc., 95(4), 607–657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Macrosty, H. W. (1940). The overseas trade of the United Kingdom 1930-39. J. R. Stat. Soc., 103(4), 451–490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Meredith, D. (1975). The British government and colonial economic policy, 1919-39. Econ. Hist. Rev., 28(3), 484–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ogen, O. (2008). The economic lifeline of British Global Empire: A reconsideration of the historical dynamics of the Suez Canal, 1869-1956. Uluslar. Sos. Araşt. Derg., 1(5), 524–533. [Google Scholar]
Özçelik, F. (2023). Birinci dünya savaşı ve kıbrıs. İnönü Üniv. Ulus. Sos. Bil. Derg., 12(1), 38–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Sarınay, Y. (2000). Osmanlı İdaresinde Kıbrıs (Nüfusu, Arazi Dağılımı ve Türk Vakıfları). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Arşivleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Osmanlı Arşivi Daire Başkanlığı. [Google Scholar]
Satan, A. (2004). Yeni ingiliz belgeleri ışığında kıbrıs ve önemi. Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmalar, 6, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
T.C. (1943). The economic development of the British Colonial Empire. Bull. Int. News., 20(4), 139–145. [Google Scholar]
Tekeli, İ. & İlkin, S. (1977). 1929 Dünya Buhranında Türkiye’nin İktisadi Politika Arayışları. Ankara: Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
Twiss, T. (1885). Le Canal Maritime de Suez et la Commission Internationale de Paris. Bruxelles. [Google Scholar]
Uzunçarşılı, İ. H. (1988). Osmanlı Tarihi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu. [Google Scholar]

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
Korkmaz, S. & Tutsak, S. (2023). A Historical Background of Foreign Trade in Cyprus (1923-1938). J. Account. Fin. Audit. Stud., 9(4), 449-467. https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas090405
S. Korkmaz and S. Tutsak, "A Historical Background of Foreign Trade in Cyprus (1923-1938)," J. Account. Fin. Audit. Stud., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 449-467, 2023. https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas090405
@research-article{Korkmaz2023AHB,
title={A Historical Background of Foreign Trade in Cyprus (1923-1938)},
author={Sevgi Korkmaz and Sadiye Tutsak},
journal={Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies},
year={2023},
page={449-467},
doi={https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas090405}
}
Sevgi Korkmaz, et al. "A Historical Background of Foreign Trade in Cyprus (1923-1938)." Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, v 9, pp 449-467. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas090405
Sevgi Korkmaz and Sadiye Tutsak. "A Historical Background of Foreign Trade in Cyprus (1923-1938)." Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 9, (2023): 449-467. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas090405
cc
©2023 by the author(s). Published by Acadlore Publishing Services Limited, Hong Kong. This article is available for free download and can be reused and cited, provided that the original published version is credited, under the CC BY 4.0 license.