Javascript is required
[1] Hossain, M.S., Fatmi, M.R. (2022). Modelling the adoption of autonomous vehicle: How historical experience inform the future preference. Travel Behaviour and Society, 26: 57-66. [Crossref]
[2] Woo, S., Youtie, J., Ott, I., Scheu, F. (2021). Understanding the long-term emergence of autonomous vehicles technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170: 120852. [Crossref]
[3] Chehri, A., Mouftah, H.T. (2019). Autonomous vehicles in the sustainable cities, the beginning of a green adventure. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51: 101751. [Crossref]
[4] Nenseth, V., Ciccone, A., Kristensen, N.B. (2019). Societal consequences of automated vehicles–Norwegian Scenarios. TØI Report.
[5] Chng, S., Cheah, L. (2020). Understanding autonomous road public transport acceptance: A study of Singapore. Sustainability, 12(12): 4974. [Crossref]
[6] Iclodean, C., Cordos, N., Varga, B.O. (2020). Autonomous shuttle bus for public transportation: A review. Energies, 13(11): 2917. [Crossref]
[7] Puspitasari, N., Firdaus, M.B., Haris, C.A., Setyadi, H.J. (2019). An application of the UTAUT model for analysis of adoption of integrated license service information system. Procedia Computer Science, 161: 57-65. [Crossref]
[8] Sarosa, S. (2019). The role of brand reputation and perceived enjoyment in accepting compulsory device’s usage: Extending UTAUT. Procedia Computer Science, 161: 115-122. [Crossref]
[9] Kabra, G., Ramesh, A., Akhtar, P., Dash, M.K. (2017). Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: Insights from humanitarian practitioners. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7): 1250-1261. [Crossref]
[10] Chen, J., Li, R., Gan, M., Fu, Z., Yuan, F. (2020). Public acceptance of driverless buses in China: An empirical analysis based on an extended UTAUT model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020: 1-13. [Crossref]
[11] Ingvardson, J.B., Nielsen, O.A. (2019). The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126: 37-57. [Crossref]
[12] Wan, L., Xie, S., Shu, A. (2020). Toward an understanding of university students’ continued intention to use MOOCs: When UTAUT model meets TTF model. Sage Open, 10(3): 2158244020941858. [Crossref]
[13] Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112: 220-233. [Crossref]
[14] Mouratidis, K., Serrano, V.C. (2021). Autonomous buses: Intentions to use, passenger experiences, and suggestions for improvement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 76: 321-335. [Crossref]
[15] Sisiopiku, V.P., Yang, W., Mason, J., McKinney, B., Hwangbo, S.W., Classen, S. (2023). Examining the impact of age and gender on drivers' perceptions toward autonomous vehicles before and after autonomous driving simulator exposure. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 7(2): 85-93. [Crossref]
[16] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. [Crossref]
[17] Cimperman, M., Brenčič, M.M., Trkman, P. (2016). Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—applying an Extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90: 22-31. [Crossref]
[18] Salonen, A.O., Haavisto, N. (2019). Towards autonomous transportation. Passengers’ experiences, perceptions and feelings in a driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Sustainability, 11(3): 588. [Crossref]
[19] Maeng, K., Cho, Y. (2022). Who will want to use shared autonomous vehicle service and how much? A consumer experiment in South Korea. Travel Behaviour and Society, 26: 9-17. [Crossref]
[20] Bernhard, C., Oberfeld, D., Hoffmann, C., Weismüller, D., Hecht, H. (2020). User acceptance of automated public transport: Valence of an autonomous minibus experience. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 70: 109-123. [Crossref]
[21] Pakusch, C., Bossauer, P. (2017). User acceptance of fully autonomous public transport. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications, Madrid, Spain, pp. 52-60. [Crossref]
[22] Millonig, A., Fröhlich, P. (2018). Where autonomous buses might and might not bridge the gaps in the 4 A's of public transport passenger needs: A review. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, New York, USA, pp. 291-297. [Crossref]
[23] Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1): 159-172. [Crossref]
[24] Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., Merat, N. (2017). What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 50: 55-64. [Crossref]
[25] Zmud, J., Sener, I.N., Wagner, J. (2016). Consumer acceptance and travel behavior: Impacts of automated vehicles: Final report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, PRC 15-49 F.
[26] Panagiotopoulos, I., Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018). An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95: 773-784. [Crossref]
[27] Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98: 207-220. [Crossref]
[28] Goldbach, C., Sickmann, J., Pitz, T., Zimasa, T. (2022). Towards autonomous public transportation: Attitudes and intentions of the local population. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13: 100504. [Crossref]
[29] Pigeon, C., Alauzet, A., Paire-Ficout, L. (2021). Factors of acceptability, acceptance and usage for non-rail autonomous public transport vehicles: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81: 251-270. [Crossref]
[30] Korkmaz, H., Fidanoglu, A., Ozcelik, S., Okumus, A. (2022). User acceptance of autonomous public transport systems: Extended UTAUT2 model. Journal of Public Transportation, 24: 100013. [Crossref]
[31] Yuen, K.F., Wong, Y.D., Ma, F., Wang, X. (2020). The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270: 121904. [Crossref]
[32] Wijaya, F., Solikhatin, S.A. (2021). Analysis of end-user satisfaction of zoom application for online lectures. In 2021 3rd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT), Surabaya, Indonesia, pp. 348-353. [Crossref]
[33] Amsal, A.A., Putri, S.L., Rahadi, F., Fitri, M.E.Y. (2021). Perceived satisfaction and perceived usefulness of e-learning: The role of interactive learning and social influence. In the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020), pp. 535-541. [Crossref]
[34] Junnonyang, E. (2021). Integrating TAM, perceived risk, trust, relative advantage, government support, social influence and user satisfaction as predictors of mobile government adoption behavior in Thailand. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 13(1): 159-178.
[35] Zhou, M., Zhao, L.D., Kong, N., Campy, K.S., Xu, G., Zhu, G.J., Cao, X.Y., Wang, S. (2020). Understanding consumers’ behavior to adopt self-service parcel services for last-mile delivery. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52: 101911. [Crossref]
[36] Rosell, J., Allen, J. (2020). Test-riding the driverless bus: Determinants of satisfaction and reuse intention in eight test-track locations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140: 166-189. [Crossref]
[37] Kassens-Noor, E., Dake, D., Decaminada, T., Kotval-K, Z., Qu, T., Wilson, M., Pentland, B. (2020). Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city. Transport Policy, 99: 329-335. [Crossref]
[38] Becker, F., Axhausen, K.W. (2017). Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation, 44(6): 1293-1306. [Crossref]
[39] Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95: 320-334. [Crossref]
[40] Salonen, A.O. (2018). Passenger's subjective traffic safety, in-vehicle security and emergency management in the driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Transport Policy, 61: 106-110. [Crossref]
[41] Jing, P., Xu, G., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., Zhan, F. (2020). The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(5): 1719. [Crossref]
[42] Herrenkind, B., Brendel, A.B., Nastjuk, I., Greve, M., Kolbe, L.M. (2019). Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74: 255-276. [Crossref]
[43] Nordhoff, S., Kyriakidis, M., Van Arem, B., Happee, R. (2019). A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): A review-based study. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(6): 682-710. [Crossref]
[44] Chen, C.F. (2019). Factors affecting the decision to use autonomous shuttle services: Evidence from a scooter-dominant urban context. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67: 195-204. [Crossref]
[45] Cai, L., Yuen, K.F., Wang, X. (2023). Explore public acceptance of autonomous buses: An integrated model of UTAUT, TTF and trust. Travel Behaviour and Society, 31: 120-130. [Crossref]
[46] Yuen, K.F., Choo, L.Q., Li, X., Wong, Y.D., Ma, F., Wang, X. (2022). A theoretical investigation of user acceptance of autonomous public transport. Transportation, 50: 545-569. [Crossref]
[47] Kaur, K., Rampersad, G. (2018). Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48: 87-96. [Crossref]
[48] Martins, C., Oliveira, T., Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1): 1-13. [Crossref]
[49] Noy, I.Y., Shinar, D., Horrey, W.J. (2018). Automated driving: Safety blind spots. Safety Science, 102: 68-78. [Crossref]
[50] Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Algharabat, R. (2018). Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40: 125-138. [Crossref]
[51] Liu, P., Yang, R., Xu, Z. (2019). Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Analysis, 39(2): 326-341. [Crossref]
[52] Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray, A.A., Tabar, M.J.S. (2014). Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1): 62-78. [Crossref]
[53] Hulse, L.M., Xie, H., Galea, E.R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102: 1-13. [Crossref]
[54] Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., Wang, J. (2019). Understanding consumers’ willingness to use ride-sharing services: The roles of perceived value and perceived risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105: 504-519. [Crossref]
[55] Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[56] Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544. [Crossref]
[57] Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. [Crossref]
[58] Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 125-143. [Crossref]
[59] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211. [Crossref]
[60] Maillet, É., Mathieu, L., Sicotte, C. (2015). Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: An extension of the UTAUT. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(1): 36-47. [Crossref]
[61] DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R. (2016). Information systems success measurement. Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems, 2(1): 1-116. http:// doi.org/10.1561/2900000005
[62] Arpaci, I. (2016). Understanding and predicting students' intention to use mobile cloud storage services. Computers in Human Behavior, 58: 150-157. [Crossref]
[63] Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3): 99-110. [Crossref]
[64] Khalilzadeh, J., Ozturk, A.B., Bilgihan, A. (2017). Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 70: 460-474. [Crossref]
[65] Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E, Babin, B.J., Black, W.C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, Upper Saddle River (N.J.): Pearson Education.
[66] Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(3): 32-49.
[67] Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C.L., Randolph, A.B., Chong, A.Y.L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3): 442-458. [Crossref]
[68] Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption ans use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, (2/2)2: 285-309.
[69] Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2): 295-336.
[70] Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing, 20: 277-319. [Crossref]
[71] Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N.P., Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature, p. 197. [Crossref]
[72] Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2): 139-152. [Crossref]
[73] Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Journals, 18(3): 382-388. [Crossref]
[74] Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43: 115-135. [Crossref]
[75] Kline, R.B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications.
[76] Chin, W.W. (2009). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[77] Primer, A.P. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1): 155-159.
[78] Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.
[79] Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. Education+ Training, 49(4): 336-337. [Crossref]
[80] Alolah, T., Stewart, R.A., Panuwatwanich, K., Mohamed, S. (2014). Determining the causal relationships among balanced scorecard perspectives on school safety performance: Case of Saudi Arabia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68: 57-74. [Crossref]
[81] Tenenhaus, M., Vinzia, Y.C., Lauro, C. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1): 159-205. [Crossref]
[82] Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (2010). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modeling: A comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(8): 1299-1318. [Crossref]
[83] Duarte, P.A.O., Raposo, M.L.B. (2010). A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the mobile phone market. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, 449-485. [Crossref]
[84] Henseler, J., Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28: 565-580. [Crossref]
[85] Assemi, B., Jafarzadeh, H., Mesbah, M., Hickman, M. (2018). Participants' perceptions of smartphone travel surveys. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54: 338-348. [Crossref]
[86] Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A. (2015). Sustainable transportation: An overview, framework and further research directions. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(6): 695-718. [Crossref]
[87] Liu, P., Xu, Z., Zhao, X. (2019). Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124: 354-369. [Crossref]
[88] Efron, B., Gong, G. (1983). A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. The American Statistician, 37(1): 36-48. [Crossref]
[89] Tortosa, V., Moliner, M.A., Sánchez, J. (2009). Internal market orientation and its influence on organisational performance. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12): 1435-1456. [Crossref]
[90] Hayes, A.F. (2013). Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.
[91] Chen, Z., van Lierop, D., Ettema, D. (2020). Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications? Transport Reviews, 40(3): 333-353. [Crossref]
[92] Pak, T.Y., Bae, B., Lee, C., Jung, I., Jang, B.J. (2023). Modeling public acceptance of demand-responsive transportation: An integrated UTAUT and ITM framework. Journal of Public Transportation, 25: 100067. [Crossref]
[93] Chao, C.M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 1652. [Crossref]
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJTDI from 2025 Vol. 9, No. 4. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities

Hao Dong1*,
Haslinda Hashim1,
Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman2
1
School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
2
Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
International Journal of Transport Development and Integration
|
Volume 8, Issue 1, 2024
|
Pages 119-129
Received: 01-09-2024,
Revised: 02-26-2024,
Accepted: 03-11-2024,
Available online: 03-30-2024
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

Developing insight into the determinants that impact communities' willingness to accept autonomous buses has become a crucial aspect of smart city advancement. This study investigated the inclination of residents to utilize autonomous buses by employing the expanded Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, encompassing satisfaction, trust, and perceived risk. The UTAUT model is an influential theoretical framework used to forecast and elucidate the acceptance of new technology by people or organizations. The results show that (1) Effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions have a considerable beneficial effect on both behavioral intention and satisfaction. (2) A significant positive correlation exists between behavioral intention and satisfaction and trust. (3) Perceived risk also has a detrimental moderating impact. The results offer governments and public transportation operators a valuable blueprint for the development and promotion of autonomous buses in metropolitan regions. Current findings can play as a helpful point of reference for enhancing development of autonomous public transportation in China.

Keywords: UTAUT model, autonomous public transport, satisfaction, trust, perceived risk, China
References
[1] Hossain, M.S., Fatmi, M.R. (2022). Modelling the adoption of autonomous vehicle: How historical experience inform the future preference. Travel Behaviour and Society, 26: 57-66. [Crossref]
[2] Woo, S., Youtie, J., Ott, I., Scheu, F. (2021). Understanding the long-term emergence of autonomous vehicles technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170: 120852. [Crossref]
[3] Chehri, A., Mouftah, H.T. (2019). Autonomous vehicles in the sustainable cities, the beginning of a green adventure. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51: 101751. [Crossref]
[4] Nenseth, V., Ciccone, A., Kristensen, N.B. (2019). Societal consequences of automated vehicles–Norwegian Scenarios. TØI Report.
[5] Chng, S., Cheah, L. (2020). Understanding autonomous road public transport acceptance: A study of Singapore. Sustainability, 12(12): 4974. [Crossref]
[6] Iclodean, C., Cordos, N., Varga, B.O. (2020). Autonomous shuttle bus for public transportation: A review. Energies, 13(11): 2917. [Crossref]
[7] Puspitasari, N., Firdaus, M.B., Haris, C.A., Setyadi, H.J. (2019). An application of the UTAUT model for analysis of adoption of integrated license service information system. Procedia Computer Science, 161: 57-65. [Crossref]
[8] Sarosa, S. (2019). The role of brand reputation and perceived enjoyment in accepting compulsory device’s usage: Extending UTAUT. Procedia Computer Science, 161: 115-122. [Crossref]
[9] Kabra, G., Ramesh, A., Akhtar, P., Dash, M.K. (2017). Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: Insights from humanitarian practitioners. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7): 1250-1261. [Crossref]
[10] Chen, J., Li, R., Gan, M., Fu, Z., Yuan, F. (2020). Public acceptance of driverless buses in China: An empirical analysis based on an extended UTAUT model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020: 1-13. [Crossref]
[11] Ingvardson, J.B., Nielsen, O.A. (2019). The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126: 37-57. [Crossref]
[12] Wan, L., Xie, S., Shu, A. (2020). Toward an understanding of university students’ continued intention to use MOOCs: When UTAUT model meets TTF model. Sage Open, 10(3): 2158244020941858. [Crossref]
[13] Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112: 220-233. [Crossref]
[14] Mouratidis, K., Serrano, V.C. (2021). Autonomous buses: Intentions to use, passenger experiences, and suggestions for improvement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 76: 321-335. [Crossref]
[15] Sisiopiku, V.P., Yang, W., Mason, J., McKinney, B., Hwangbo, S.W., Classen, S. (2023). Examining the impact of age and gender on drivers' perceptions toward autonomous vehicles before and after autonomous driving simulator exposure. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 7(2): 85-93. [Crossref]
[16] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. [Crossref]
[17] Cimperman, M., Brenčič, M.M., Trkman, P. (2016). Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—applying an Extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90: 22-31. [Crossref]
[18] Salonen, A.O., Haavisto, N. (2019). Towards autonomous transportation. Passengers’ experiences, perceptions and feelings in a driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Sustainability, 11(3): 588. [Crossref]
[19] Maeng, K., Cho, Y. (2022). Who will want to use shared autonomous vehicle service and how much? A consumer experiment in South Korea. Travel Behaviour and Society, 26: 9-17. [Crossref]
[20] Bernhard, C., Oberfeld, D., Hoffmann, C., Weismüller, D., Hecht, H. (2020). User acceptance of automated public transport: Valence of an autonomous minibus experience. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 70: 109-123. [Crossref]
[21] Pakusch, C., Bossauer, P. (2017). User acceptance of fully autonomous public transport. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on e-Business and Telecommunications, Madrid, Spain, pp. 52-60. [Crossref]
[22] Millonig, A., Fröhlich, P. (2018). Where autonomous buses might and might not bridge the gaps in the 4 A's of public transport passenger needs: A review. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, New York, USA, pp. 291-297. [Crossref]
[23] Holden, R.J., Karsh, B.T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1): 159-172. [Crossref]
[24] Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., Merat, N. (2017). What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 50: 55-64. [Crossref]
[25] Zmud, J., Sener, I.N., Wagner, J. (2016). Consumer acceptance and travel behavior: Impacts of automated vehicles: Final report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, PRC 15-49 F.
[26] Panagiotopoulos, I., Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018). An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95: 773-784. [Crossref]
[27] Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98: 207-220. [Crossref]
[28] Goldbach, C., Sickmann, J., Pitz, T., Zimasa, T. (2022). Towards autonomous public transportation: Attitudes and intentions of the local population. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 13: 100504. [Crossref]
[29] Pigeon, C., Alauzet, A., Paire-Ficout, L. (2021). Factors of acceptability, acceptance and usage for non-rail autonomous public transport vehicles: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81: 251-270. [Crossref]
[30] Korkmaz, H., Fidanoglu, A., Ozcelik, S., Okumus, A. (2022). User acceptance of autonomous public transport systems: Extended UTAUT2 model. Journal of Public Transportation, 24: 100013. [Crossref]
[31] Yuen, K.F., Wong, Y.D., Ma, F., Wang, X. (2020). The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270: 121904. [Crossref]
[32] Wijaya, F., Solikhatin, S.A. (2021). Analysis of end-user satisfaction of zoom application for online lectures. In 2021 3rd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT), Surabaya, Indonesia, pp. 348-353. [Crossref]
[33] Amsal, A.A., Putri, S.L., Rahadi, F., Fitri, M.E.Y. (2021). Perceived satisfaction and perceived usefulness of e-learning: The role of interactive learning and social influence. In the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020), pp. 535-541. [Crossref]
[34] Junnonyang, E. (2021). Integrating TAM, perceived risk, trust, relative advantage, government support, social influence and user satisfaction as predictors of mobile government adoption behavior in Thailand. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 13(1): 159-178.
[35] Zhou, M., Zhao, L.D., Kong, N., Campy, K.S., Xu, G., Zhu, G.J., Cao, X.Y., Wang, S. (2020). Understanding consumers’ behavior to adopt self-service parcel services for last-mile delivery. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52: 101911. [Crossref]
[36] Rosell, J., Allen, J. (2020). Test-riding the driverless bus: Determinants of satisfaction and reuse intention in eight test-track locations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140: 166-189. [Crossref]
[37] Kassens-Noor, E., Dake, D., Decaminada, T., Kotval-K, Z., Qu, T., Wilson, M., Pentland, B. (2020). Sociomobility of the 21st century: Autonomous vehicles, planning, and the future city. Transport Policy, 99: 329-335. [Crossref]
[38] Becker, F., Axhausen, K.W. (2017). Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation, 44(6): 1293-1306. [Crossref]
[39] Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95: 320-334. [Crossref]
[40] Salonen, A.O. (2018). Passenger's subjective traffic safety, in-vehicle security and emergency management in the driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Transport Policy, 61: 106-110. [Crossref]
[41] Jing, P., Xu, G., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., Zhan, F. (2020). The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(5): 1719. [Crossref]
[42] Herrenkind, B., Brendel, A.B., Nastjuk, I., Greve, M., Kolbe, L.M. (2019). Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74: 255-276. [Crossref]
[43] Nordhoff, S., Kyriakidis, M., Van Arem, B., Happee, R. (2019). A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): A review-based study. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(6): 682-710. [Crossref]
[44] Chen, C.F. (2019). Factors affecting the decision to use autonomous shuttle services: Evidence from a scooter-dominant urban context. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67: 195-204. [Crossref]
[45] Cai, L., Yuen, K.F., Wang, X. (2023). Explore public acceptance of autonomous buses: An integrated model of UTAUT, TTF and trust. Travel Behaviour and Society, 31: 120-130. [Crossref]
[46] Yuen, K.F., Choo, L.Q., Li, X., Wong, Y.D., Ma, F., Wang, X. (2022). A theoretical investigation of user acceptance of autonomous public transport. Transportation, 50: 545-569. [Crossref]
[47] Kaur, K., Rampersad, G. (2018). Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48: 87-96. [Crossref]
[48] Martins, C., Oliveira, T., Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1): 1-13. [Crossref]
[49] Noy, I.Y., Shinar, D., Horrey, W.J. (2018). Automated driving: Safety blind spots. Safety Science, 102: 68-78. [Crossref]
[50] Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Algharabat, R. (2018). Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers’ intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40: 125-138. [Crossref]
[51] Liu, P., Yang, R., Xu, Z. (2019). Public acceptance of fully automated driving: Effects of social trust and risk/benefit perceptions. Risk Analysis, 39(2): 326-341. [Crossref]
[52] Hanafizadeh, P., Behboudi, M., Koshksaray, A.A., Tabar, M.J.S. (2014). Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1): 62-78. [Crossref]
[53] Hulse, L.M., Xie, H., Galea, E.R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102: 1-13. [Crossref]
[54] Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., Wang, J. (2019). Understanding consumers’ willingness to use ride-sharing services: The roles of perceived value and perceived risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105: 504-519. [Crossref]
[55] Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[56] Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544. [Crossref]
[57] Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340. [Crossref]
[58] Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A., Howell, J.M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 125-143. [Crossref]
[59] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211. [Crossref]
[60] Maillet, É., Mathieu, L., Sicotte, C. (2015). Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: An extension of the UTAUT. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(1): 36-47. [Crossref]
[61] DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R. (2016). Information systems success measurement. Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems, 2(1): 1-116. http:// doi.org/10.1561/2900000005
[62] Arpaci, I. (2016). Understanding and predicting students' intention to use mobile cloud storage services. Computers in Human Behavior, 58: 150-157. [Crossref]
[63] Alalwan, A.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3): 99-110. [Crossref]
[64] Khalilzadeh, J., Ozturk, A.B., Bilgihan, A. (2017). Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 70: 460-474. [Crossref]
[65] Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E, Babin, B.J., Black, W.C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, Upper Saddle River (N.J.): Pearson Education.
[66] Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(3): 32-49.
[67] Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C.L., Randolph, A.B., Chong, A.Y.L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3): 442-458. [Crossref]
[68] Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption ans use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, (2/2)2: 285-309.
[69] Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2): 295-336.
[70] Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing, 20: 277-319. [Crossref]
[71] Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N.P., Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature, p. 197. [Crossref]
[72] Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2): 139-152. [Crossref]
[73] Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Journals, 18(3): 382-388. [Crossref]
[74] Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43: 115-135. [Crossref]
[75] Kline, R.B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications.
[76] Chin, W.W. (2009). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[77] Primer, A.P. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1): 155-159.
[78] Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.
[79] Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. Education+ Training, 49(4): 336-337. [Crossref]
[80] Alolah, T., Stewart, R.A., Panuwatwanich, K., Mohamed, S. (2014). Determining the causal relationships among balanced scorecard perspectives on school safety performance: Case of Saudi Arabia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68: 57-74. [Crossref]
[81] Tenenhaus, M., Vinzia, Y.C., Lauro, C. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1): 159-205. [Crossref]
[82] Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (2010). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modeling: A comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies. Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(8): 1299-1318. [Crossref]
[83] Duarte, P.A.O., Raposo, M.L.B. (2010). A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the mobile phone market. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, 449-485. [Crossref]
[84] Henseler, J., Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28: 565-580. [Crossref]
[85] Assemi, B., Jafarzadeh, H., Mesbah, M., Hickman, M. (2018). Participants' perceptions of smartphone travel surveys. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54: 338-348. [Crossref]
[86] Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A. (2015). Sustainable transportation: An overview, framework and further research directions. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(6): 695-718. [Crossref]
[87] Liu, P., Xu, Z., Zhao, X. (2019). Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124: 354-369. [Crossref]
[88] Efron, B., Gong, G. (1983). A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. The American Statistician, 37(1): 36-48. [Crossref]
[89] Tortosa, V., Moliner, M.A., Sánchez, J. (2009). Internal market orientation and its influence on organisational performance. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12): 1435-1456. [Crossref]
[90] Hayes, A.F. (2013). Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.
[91] Chen, Z., van Lierop, D., Ettema, D. (2020). Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications? Transport Reviews, 40(3): 333-353. [Crossref]
[92] Pak, T.Y., Bae, B., Lee, C., Jung, I., Jang, B.J. (2023). Modeling public acceptance of demand-responsive transportation: An integrated UTAUT and ITM framework. Journal of Public Transportation, 25: 100067. [Crossref]
[93] Chao, C.M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 1652. [Crossref]
Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Dong, H., Hashim, H., & Kamarulzaman, N. H. (2024). Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities. Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., 8(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080111
H. Dong, H. Hashim, and N. H. Kamarulzaman, "Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities," Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 119-129, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080111
@research-article{Dong2024FactorsIP,
title={Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities},
author={Hao Dong and Haslinda Hashim and Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman},
journal={International Journal of Transport Development and Integration},
year={2024},
page={119-129},
doi={https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080111}
}
Hao Dong, et al. "Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities." International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, v 8, pp 119-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080111
Hao Dong, Haslinda Hashim and Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman. "Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities." International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 8, (2024): 119-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080111
DONG H， HASHIM H， KAMARULZAMAN N H. Factors Influencing Passengers to Use Autonomous Bus in China Cities[J]. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration， 2024， 8(1)： 119-129. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080111