Javascript is required
[1] Chowdhury, S., Hadas, Y., Gonzalez, V.A., Schot, B. (2018). Public transport users' and policy makers' perceptions of integrated public transport systems. Transport Policy, 61: 75-83. [Crossref]
[2] Thomas, D. P. (2016). Public transportation in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities. World, 3(3): 352-366.
[3] Feikie, X.E., Das, D.K., Mostafa, M.M.H. (2018). Perceptions of the factors causing traffic congestion and plausible measures to alleviate the challenge in Bloemfontein, South Africa. In 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2018), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 742-754.
[4] Yasin, Y.J., Grivna, M., Abu-Zidan, F.M. (2021). Global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic collisions. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 16(1): 1-14. [Crossref]
[5] Ceder, A. (2021). Urban mobility and public transport: Future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25(4): 455-479. [Crossref]
[6] Lilhore, U.K., Imoize, A.L., Li, C.T., Simaiya, S., Pani, S. K., Goyal, N., Kumar, A., Lee, C.C. (2022). Design and implementation of an ML and IoT based adaptive traffic-management system for smart cities. Sensors, 22(8): 2908. [Crossref]
[7] Pronello, C., Simão, J.P.R.V., Rappazzo, V. (2017). The effects of the multimodal real-time information systems on travel behavior. Transportation Research Procedia, 25: 2677-2689. [Crossref]
[8] Pronello, C., Camusso, C. (2015). User requirements for the design of efficient mobile devices to navigate through public transport networks. In: Thomopoulos, N., Givoni, M., Rietveld, P. (eds) ICT for Transport: Opportunities and Threats. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 55-93.
[9] Luckan, Y. (2022). Towards a humanistic approach to inclusive public transport: A critical case study of Durban, South Africa. Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment, 2(1): 1-8. [Crossref]
[10] Aropet, R. (2017). Southern African solutions to public transport challenges. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 805-810.
[11] Statistics South Africa. (2019). General Household Survey 2018. Government of South Africa, p. 203.
[12] Mthimkulu, N. (2017). Southern African solutions to public transport challenges. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 811-817.
[13] Vegter, I. (2020). South Africa's minibus taxi industry — Resistance to formalisation and innovation. https://irr.org.za/reports/occasional-reports/files/web-irr-south-africas-minibus-taxiindustry-report.pdf, accessed on Jul. 15, 2023.
[14] Mtizi, C. (2017). Southern African solutions to public transport challenges. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 818-825.
[15] Kgwedi, R., Krygsman, S. (2017.). Minibus-taxis as providers of scheduled, park & ride services: A Concept for Stellenbosch. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 362-374.
[16] Hlatshwayo, M. (2022). The public transport crisis in South Africa: Through the eyes of the four revolutions. The Thinker, 92(3): 49-60.
[17] Mbowa, K., Aigbavboa, C., Akinshipe, O., Thwala, D.W. (2021). An overview of key emerging technologies transforming public transportation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution era. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1107(1): 012169. IOP Publishing. [Crossref]
[18] Ceder, A. (2004). New urban public transportation systems: Initiatives, effectiveness, and challenges. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 130(1): 56-65. [Crossref]
[19] van Biljon, H.M., van Niekerk, L. (2021). Community mobility and transport use of urban older adults who attend public healthcare in Gauteng, South Africa. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(3): 34-41. [Crossref]
[20] Odame, P.K., Amoako-Sakyi, R.O., Abane, A., Zuidgeest, M. (2023). Exploring stakeholders' response to travel needs of commuters with disability in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly. Geo: Geography and Environment, 10(2): e129. [Crossref]
[21] Venter, C., Jennings, G., Hidalgo, D., Valderrama Pineda, A. F. (2018). The equity impacts of bus rapid transit: A review of the evidence and implications for sustainable transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(2): 140-152. [Crossref]
[22] Becker, P., Tebes, G., Peppino, D. Olsina, L. (2019). Applying an improving strategy that embeds functional and non-functional requirements concepts. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 19(2): 153-174. [Crossref]
[23] Dabbagh, M., Lee, S.P. (2014). An approach for integrating the prioritization of functional and non-functional requirements. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. [Crossref]
[24] Pacheco, C., Garcia, I., Reyes, M. (2018). Requirements elicitation techniques: A systematic literature review based on the maturity of the techniques. IET Software, 12(4): 365-378. [Crossref]
[25] Ferreira Martins, H., Carvalho de Oliveira Junior, A., Dias Canedo, E., Dias Kosloski, R. A., Ávila Paldês, R., & Costa Oliveira, E. (2019). Design thinking: Challenges for software requirements elicitation. Information, 10(12): 371. [Crossref]
[26] Batra, M., Bhatnagar, A. (2019). Requirements elicitation technique selection: A five factors approach. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C): 1332-1341. [Crossref]
[27] Sommerville, I. (2016) Software Engineering. 10th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Boston.
[28] Martínez, R., Moreno-Muro, F.J., Melero-Muñoz, F.J., Bueno-Delgado, M.V., Garrido-Lova, J., Sánchez-Melero, M., Tuveter, K. (2021). Co-design and engineering of user requirements for a novel ICT healthcare solution in Murcia, Spain. In: Pires, I.M., Spinsante, S., Zdravevski, E., Lameski, P. (eds) Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good. GOODTECHS 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 401. Springer, Cham. [Crossref]
[29] Bell, D., Nusir, M. (2017). Co-design for government e-service stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, pp. 2539-2548.
[30] Ouhbi, S., Karampela, M., Isomursu, M. (2019, May). Integrating users logic into requirements engineering for connected healthcare co-design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2019), pp. 480-485. [Crossref]
[31] Macedo, E., Teixeira, J., Sampaio, C., Silva, N., Coelho, M.C., Glinos, M., Bandeira, J.M. (2021). Real-time information systems for public transport: User perspective. Transportation Research Procedia, 52: 732-739. [Crossref]
[32] Chang, J.H., Lee, C.H. (2023). The effect of real-time crowding information on tourists’ procrastination of planned travel schedule. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56: 18-28. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
[33] Drabicki, A., Cats, O., Kucharski, R., Fonzone, A., Szarata, A. (2023). Should I stay, or should I board? Willingness to wait with real-time crowding information in urban public transport. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 47: 100963. [Crossref]
[34] Spoorwegen, N. (2021). Travelling in crowded trains. https://www.ns.nl/reisinformatie/serviceverbeteren/wat-kunt-je-doen-bij-drukte.html, accessed on Jul. 19, 2021.
[35] Lushi, A., Daas, D., Nadeem, M. (2022). IoT-based public transport management system. In 2022 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (GCAIoT), Alamein New City, Egypt, pp. 69-75. [Crossref]
[36] Bruglieri, M., Bruschi, F., Colorni, A., Luè, A., Nocerino, R., Rana, V. (2016). A real-time information system for public transport in case of delays and service disruptions. Transportation Research Procedia, 10: 493-502. [Crossref]
[37] Singh, G., Bansal, D., Sofat, S. (2014). Intelligent transportation system for developing countries-A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 85(3): 34-38.
[38] Gumbo, T., & Moyo, T. (2020). Exploring the interoperability of public transport systems for sustainable mobility in developing cities: Lessons from Johannesburg Metropolitan City, South Africa. Sustainability, 12(15): 5875. [Crossref]
[39] Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for Business Students (7th Edition). Harlow: Pearson Education.
[40] Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C., Winhall, J. (2006). Transformation design. RED Paper 2. https://designblog.uniandes.edu.co/blogs/desis/files/2009/06/transformationdesignfinaldraft.pdf.
[41] Irbīte, A., Strode, A. (2016). Design thinking models in design research and education. In: Vol. 4 (2016): Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4: 488-500. [Crossref]
[42] Costa, N., Patrício, L., Morelli, N. (2018). A designedly-way of conducting qualitative research in design studies. In Proceedings of the ServDes2018 Conference: Service Design Proof of Concept. Linköping University Electronic Press, p. 164.
[43] Al-Qutaish, R.E. (2010). Quality models in software engineering literature: An analytical and comparative study. Journal of American Science, 6(3): 166-175.
[44] Duri, B., Luke, R. (2022). The structural barriers to universally accessible transport: The Tshwane (ZAF) metropolitan area study case. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 6(4): 428-442. [Crossref]
[45] Shange, N.A., Harmáček, J. (2017). Is the public transport system failing the poor: A critical analysis of the South African public transport system. Case study of Johannesburg. Masters dissertation, Palacký University, Olomouc.
[46] Venter, C., Leong, W.Y. (2018). Workshop 6 report: Wider impacts of public transport and successful implementation of desirable and beneficial projects. Research in Transportation Economics, 69: 489-493. [Crossref]
[47] Luke, R., Heyns, G.J. (2020). An analysis of the quality of public transport in Johannesburg, South Africa, using an adapted SERVQUAL model. Transportation Research Procedia, 48: 3562-3576. [Crossref]
[48] Mrníková, M., Poliak, M., Šimurková, P., Hernandez, S., Reuter, N. (2017). How important is the integration of public passenger transport. LOGI–Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 8(2): 59-68. [Crossref]
[49] Washington, O.I., Kumar, D.D., Mulemwa, A. (2021). Assessment of accessibility of public bus transportAtion in Durban by GIS-based network analysis. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 5(2): 175-189. [Crossref]
[50] Ewhrudjakpor, O., Poliaková, A., Poliak, M. (2019). The integration of passenger transport and integration barriers. Archiwum Motoryzacji, 85(3): 103-113.
[51] Leal, G.D.S.S., Guédria, W., Panetto, H. (2019). Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 106: 111-132. [Crossref]
[52] Yahia, E., Aubry, A., Panetto, H. (2012). Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems. Computers in Industry, 63(5): 443-457. [Crossref]
[53] Ralph, M. S., George, W. R. (2018). Principles of Information Systems (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[54] Arthur, J. (2021). The information legislation (PAIA, POPI, RICA) awareness of undergraduate university students: A longitudinal study. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1): 1-9. [Crossref]
[55] Mccrocklin, S. (2021). Mobile penetration in South Africa. https://www.geopoll.com/blog/mobile-penetration-south-africa/, accessed on Feb. 2, 2024.
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJTDI from 2025 Vol. 9, No. 4. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa

aphiwe hlophe1,
ayodeji afolayan1,
olawande daramola2*
1
Department of Information Technology, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 8000 Cape Town, South Africa
2
Department of Informatics, University of Pretoria, 0083 Pretoria, South Africa
International Journal of Transport Development and Integration
|
Volume 8, Issue 1, 2024
|
Pages 31-48
Received: 10-11-2023,
Revised: 02-01-2024,
Accepted: 02-11-2024,
Available online: 03-30-2024
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

Decision-making while commuting in big cities is still challenging for many citizens in developing countries. The implementation of diverse transportation modes operating in silos combined with the inaccessibility of real-time travel information prevents commuters from these countries from making informed travel decisions. Commuters often have to choose the specific means of transport that will yield the highest value in terms of cost, safety, convenience, and timeliness among alternatives. This paper uses a case study of Cape Town in South Africa to explore stakeholders' perspectives on implementing an integrated real-time information system (IRIS) and the requirements that must be satisfied. We employed a qualitative methodology, utilising semi-structured interviews and co-design sessions as the means of data collection. Four categories of stakeholders associated with transportation, including taxis, trains, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), and municipal buses, within the context of South Africa, participated in the study. The findings reveal that the commuters and the public transport operators agreed that challenges around socio-traffic incidents, infrastructure development, lack of technology resources and lack of real-time travel information are major concerns that must be addressed for successful IRIS implementation. Functional features, change management, data privacy, system integration and information sharing were the main priorities on the list of requirements. The study represents a first attempt at understanding the requirements of an IRIS from the stakeholders' perspective in the context of South Africa. It extends the discussion on using IRIS to support transportation in developing countries, which has received limited attention thus far in the literature. The study is relevant for developing futuristic policies, advanced infrastructure, and optimised service delivery in developing countries because it provides a good foundation for understanding the critical requirements for the design and development of IRIS.

Keywords: Integrated information systems, Real-time information system, Requirements elicitation, Public commuting, Stakeholder analysis, Cape town, Qualitative research, Transport decision making

1. Introduction

Cities are becoming more compact due to rapid urbanisation and changes to land-use policies. Increased pressure is placed on public transport systems worldwide due to increased urbanisation and motorisation. Efficient and sustainable urban mobility is the goal of many urban cities in the world. Recently, many transportation systems in developed countries have attempted to transform into integrated systems [1]. The possibilities for urban transport in these developed countries (e.g. Europe, North America, Japan) include trains (tram, light rail, subway, underground, metro), buses, ferries, water taxis, and smart transportation systems. As a developing country, the need for an integrated transportation system to boost urban mobility in South Africa has been identified [2].

According to the study [3], South Africa is experiencing population growth, necessitating increased infrastructure development. The population surged by 7 million from 2001 to 2011, underscoring the need for solutions that accommodate growth without compromising service quality and efficiency. The transportation sector is one critical aspect which requires attention to keep up with the demand and rapid growth of the population within urbanised areas. This situation has caused widespread issues such as traffic congestion, traffic-related deaths and injuries, pollution, and higher energy usage [4]. The high cost of fuel and traffic-related problems have also made using purely private commuting transportation undesirable [5]. Public transport systems, especially those that enable citizens to gain access to real-time information on available travel options at any given time, will significantly benefit commuters using the public transport system. Such a system will enable commuters always to make the best value-based decisions. A commuter can determine the best transportation option available for travel per time depending on critical factors such as estimated arrival time at the destination, cost, safety, and convenience. An integrated real-time information system (IRIS) can improve public transportation by providing commuters with real-time travel information to support decision-making on routes and available travel options. Real-time traffic data can help improve the commuters' experience by providing them with information on the status of a vehicle, including occupancy, speeds, and estimated arrival time. Commuters can also be provided insights into inconvenient traffic congestion so that motor vehicles are redirected to alternative routes [6]. Currently, the existing channels for accessing real-time information are mobile applications, display screens and websites. These are usually inaccessible during peak times or provide static information for commuters. Also, the data is not integrated, which makes it difficult for commuters to have a complete view of the transport system.

An IRIS can improve customer satisfaction by conveniently harnessing information sourced from multiple systems’ sources into a unified platform where travel information on all transportation alternatives can be conveniently obtained by commuters at any given time [7]. Although multimodal trip planners are becoming more important in modern transport systems, real-time navigators and studying how they affect travel behaviour still need improvement. In France, a project called Optimod'Lyon pioneered developing a real-time travel navigator on a smartphone that integrated all modes of transportation (car, public transportation, bike, bike-sharing, foot, car sharing, and carpooling). The SMART-Way smartphone application created in 2010-2011 through an EU-funded project was the first for public transportation, allowing users to access travel information on the move within Europe. Other cities worldwide, such as Zurich, Vienna, London, and Kuwait City, have created projects similar to the Smart-Way smartphone application [8]. However, these digital projects are still very few and are limited to developed countries. Such concepts have yet to be replicated in developing countries even though many developing countries have big cities that require IRIS. Some solutions operate in silos and do not allow integrated multimodal-based trip planning.

Public transport is the backbone of the South African economy, as it plays a crucial role in transporting the workforce and providing access to economic hubs in line with other countries. According to the study [9], a significant distinction exists between mobility and accessibility planning. Mobility planning focuses on enhancing transportation network performance, while accessibility planning maximises individuals' access to various opportunities, such as employment, services, education, entertainment, and goods. However, South Africa's transportation system is inefficient due to the lack of mobility and accessibility planning. This paper reports an investigation of the stakeholders' perspective for IRIS in the context of South Africa to lay a good foundation for the design and development of an IRIS if such were to be created in the immediate future. Thus, the research questions of the study are:

1. What challenges affect the provision of real-time information for public commuting decision-making in South Africa?

2. What are the requirements for an IRIS for public commuting in South Africa?

The research questions seek to collect data at the operational level, focusing on internal stakeholders involved in the operation of the IRIS and the external stakeholders (the commuters will interact with its services).

Thus, the main objective of this study is to identify the challenges associated with implementing an IRIS for public commuting in South Africa and the specific expectations of such an IRIS after its implementation from the perspectives of critical stakeholders — commuters and transportation service providers.

As a contribution, this paper highlights the importance of understanding the requirements of an Integrated Real-Time Information System (IRIS) in the South African context from stakeholders' perspectives. By examining these requirements, the study aims to provide valuable insights into how an IRIS can be designed and implemented to address the specific needs and challenges of South Africa's transportation system. Our study also extends the discussion on integrated real-time transport information systems, a critical need in developing countries which has not received much attention thus far in the literature. Practically, the study provides a good foundation for the design and development of IRIS in South Africa and other developing countries in the immediate future. The limitation of this study is that the identified challenges of the IRIS are specific to Cape Town, and some observations may need to be more generalisable to public commuters in other cities in less developed provinces/areas of South Africa due to contextual differences. However, the observations will be relevant to other major cities in South Africa (Johannesburg, Durban) and big cities in other developing countries in Africa and beyond.

The rest of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the literature review, which provides the study's theoretical background and a review of related work. Section 3 describes the study's adopted methodology, while Section 4 outlines the study's findings. Section 5 presents the discussion of findings, while the study is concluded in Section 6 with a summary and an outlook of future work.

2. Literature Review

This section presents background on critical aspects relevant to this study and reviews related work.

2.1 Public Transport in South Africa

3. Methodology

3.1 Service Design

4. Results

5. Discussion

6. Conclusion

This study explored the various challenges affecting the provision of real-time information for public commuting in South Africa to understand the stakeholder requirements for an IRIS for public commuting in a developing country such as South Africa. We undertook a qualitative study where data was collected through interviews with PTOs (public road transport, rail transport, private road transport, taxi association) and co-design sessions with commuters within the Western Cape province of South Africa.

The findings suggest that the growth and improvement of the public transportation system in developing countries like South Africa have long been plagued by several challenges. These include unreliability, safety, and socio-traffic problems like accidents, crowding, and congestion. At the same time, infrastructure is deteriorating due to insufficient investment projects and neglect. From the commuter perspective, we found that the critical requirements for an IRIS in the South African context are capabilities for searching information, multiple payment methods, support for multiple languages, and identifying the live location of vehicles on interactive maps. In addition, private transport operators (PTOs) require features such as managing drivers and fleet and customer reviews, which aid them in their administrative duties.

The findings also suggest that implementing an IRIS can benefit commuters by providing real-time information to support decision-making on modes and routes. However, to get the best experience from such a system, the features need to be well understood from all stakeholders' perspectives. The stakeholders also expressed several concerns regarding the IRIS, which include low digital literacy of commuters, lack of access to high-end digital devices, delay in the arrival times of buses, undue interference in the operations of PTOs by government, unfavourable fare increases; accuracy and currency of information from the IRIS; revenue sharing amongst PTOs; availability of taxi after regular working hours; poor state of infrastructure; unhealthy competition amongst PTOs; the impact of enforced standardisation and accountability on operations of PTOs; complexity of sourcing from different PTOs; and system downtimes due to regular power failure (load shedding).

This study makes an academic contribution by providing insights into the nature of public transport in South Africa and the critical requirements for designing and developing an integrated real-time information system (IRIS). The practical contribution of this study is that its findings offer significant insight into enhancing South Africa's transportation landscape. Also, the recommendations of this study will contribute to the formulation of policies that will advance infrastructure development and improve public transport service delivery standards for the benefit of commuters in South Africa and other developing countries.

In future work, the identified requirements will be used for prototype development and implementation of an IRIS. We will also conduct exploratory studies on the potential for its adoption and uptake by South African PTOs, commuters and government agencies. As a future research direction, we shall explore how emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning, and blockchain could enhance the IRIS's functionality and effectiveness and elicit stakeholder requirements for the IRIS. Further investigations will focus on evaluation studies involving commuters, public transport organisations (PTOs), and government agencies in South Africa. Specific focus will include assessing the impact of IRIS on commuters’ behaviour and traffic congestion management. We will also conduct evaluation studies regarding the usability of the IRIS, interoperability assessment (INAS) of PTOs based on the IRIS, and the influence of the IRIS on public transport efficiency, safety and effectiveness.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1] Chowdhury, S., Hadas, Y., Gonzalez, V.A., Schot, B. (2018). Public transport users' and policy makers' perceptions of integrated public transport systems. Transport Policy, 61: 75-83. [Crossref]
[2] Thomas, D. P. (2016). Public transportation in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities. World, 3(3): 352-366.
[3] Feikie, X.E., Das, D.K., Mostafa, M.M.H. (2018). Perceptions of the factors causing traffic congestion and plausible measures to alleviate the challenge in Bloemfontein, South Africa. In 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2018), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 742-754.
[4] Yasin, Y.J., Grivna, M., Abu-Zidan, F.M. (2021). Global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic collisions. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 16(1): 1-14. [Crossref]
[5] Ceder, A. (2021). Urban mobility and public transport: Future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25(4): 455-479. [Crossref]
[6] Lilhore, U.K., Imoize, A.L., Li, C.T., Simaiya, S., Pani, S. K., Goyal, N., Kumar, A., Lee, C.C. (2022). Design and implementation of an ML and IoT based adaptive traffic-management system for smart cities. Sensors, 22(8): 2908. [Crossref]
[7] Pronello, C., Simão, J.P.R.V., Rappazzo, V. (2017). The effects of the multimodal real-time information systems on travel behavior. Transportation Research Procedia, 25: 2677-2689. [Crossref]
[8] Pronello, C., Camusso, C. (2015). User requirements for the design of efficient mobile devices to navigate through public transport networks. In: Thomopoulos, N., Givoni, M., Rietveld, P. (eds) ICT for Transport: Opportunities and Threats. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 55-93.
[9] Luckan, Y. (2022). Towards a humanistic approach to inclusive public transport: A critical case study of Durban, South Africa. Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment, 2(1): 1-8. [Crossref]
[10] Aropet, R. (2017). Southern African solutions to public transport challenges. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 805-810.
[11] Statistics South Africa. (2019). General Household Survey 2018. Government of South Africa, p. 203.
[12] Mthimkulu, N. (2017). Southern African solutions to public transport challenges. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 811-817.
[13] Vegter, I. (2020). South Africa's minibus taxi industry — Resistance to formalisation and innovation. https://irr.org.za/reports/occasional-reports/files/web-irr-south-africas-minibus-taxiindustry-report.pdf, accessed on Jul. 15, 2023.
[14] Mtizi, C. (2017). Southern African solutions to public transport challenges. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 818-825.
[15] Kgwedi, R., Krygsman, S. (2017.). Minibus-taxis as providers of scheduled, park & ride services: A Concept for Stellenbosch. In 36th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2017), Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 362-374.
[16] Hlatshwayo, M. (2022). The public transport crisis in South Africa: Through the eyes of the four revolutions. The Thinker, 92(3): 49-60.
[17] Mbowa, K., Aigbavboa, C., Akinshipe, O., Thwala, D.W. (2021). An overview of key emerging technologies transforming public transportation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution era. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1107(1): 012169. IOP Publishing. [Crossref]
[18] Ceder, A. (2004). New urban public transportation systems: Initiatives, effectiveness, and challenges. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 130(1): 56-65. [Crossref]
[19] van Biljon, H.M., van Niekerk, L. (2021). Community mobility and transport use of urban older adults who attend public healthcare in Gauteng, South Africa. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(3): 34-41. [Crossref]
[20] Odame, P.K., Amoako-Sakyi, R.O., Abane, A., Zuidgeest, M. (2023). Exploring stakeholders' response to travel needs of commuters with disability in the Accra Metropolitan Assembly. Geo: Geography and Environment, 10(2): e129. [Crossref]
[21] Venter, C., Jennings, G., Hidalgo, D., Valderrama Pineda, A. F. (2018). The equity impacts of bus rapid transit: A review of the evidence and implications for sustainable transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(2): 140-152. [Crossref]
[22] Becker, P., Tebes, G., Peppino, D. Olsina, L. (2019). Applying an improving strategy that embeds functional and non-functional requirements concepts. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 19(2): 153-174. [Crossref]
[23] Dabbagh, M., Lee, S.P. (2014). An approach for integrating the prioritization of functional and non-functional requirements. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. [Crossref]
[24] Pacheco, C., Garcia, I., Reyes, M. (2018). Requirements elicitation techniques: A systematic literature review based on the maturity of the techniques. IET Software, 12(4): 365-378. [Crossref]
[25] Ferreira Martins, H., Carvalho de Oliveira Junior, A., Dias Canedo, E., Dias Kosloski, R. A., Ávila Paldês, R., & Costa Oliveira, E. (2019). Design thinking: Challenges for software requirements elicitation. Information, 10(12): 371. [Crossref]
[26] Batra, M., Bhatnagar, A. (2019). Requirements elicitation technique selection: A five factors approach. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5C): 1332-1341. [Crossref]
[27] Sommerville, I. (2016) Software Engineering. 10th Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Boston.
[28] Martínez, R., Moreno-Muro, F.J., Melero-Muñoz, F.J., Bueno-Delgado, M.V., Garrido-Lova, J., Sánchez-Melero, M., Tuveter, K. (2021). Co-design and engineering of user requirements for a novel ICT healthcare solution in Murcia, Spain. In: Pires, I.M., Spinsante, S., Zdravevski, E., Lameski, P. (eds) Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good. GOODTECHS 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 401. Springer, Cham. [Crossref]
[29] Bell, D., Nusir, M. (2017). Co-design for government e-service stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, pp. 2539-2548.
[30] Ouhbi, S., Karampela, M., Isomursu, M. (2019, May). Integrating users logic into requirements engineering for connected healthcare co-design. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2019), pp. 480-485. [Crossref]
[31] Macedo, E., Teixeira, J., Sampaio, C., Silva, N., Coelho, M.C., Glinos, M., Bandeira, J.M. (2021). Real-time information systems for public transport: User perspective. Transportation Research Procedia, 52: 732-739. [Crossref]
[32] Chang, J.H., Lee, C.H. (2023). The effect of real-time crowding information on tourists’ procrastination of planned travel schedule. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56: 18-28. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
[33] Drabicki, A., Cats, O., Kucharski, R., Fonzone, A., Szarata, A. (2023). Should I stay, or should I board? Willingness to wait with real-time crowding information in urban public transport. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 47: 100963. [Crossref]
[34] Spoorwegen, N. (2021). Travelling in crowded trains. https://www.ns.nl/reisinformatie/serviceverbeteren/wat-kunt-je-doen-bij-drukte.html, accessed on Jul. 19, 2021.
[35] Lushi, A., Daas, D., Nadeem, M. (2022). IoT-based public transport management system. In 2022 IEEE Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things (GCAIoT), Alamein New City, Egypt, pp. 69-75. [Crossref]
[36] Bruglieri, M., Bruschi, F., Colorni, A., Luè, A., Nocerino, R., Rana, V. (2016). A real-time information system for public transport in case of delays and service disruptions. Transportation Research Procedia, 10: 493-502. [Crossref]
[37] Singh, G., Bansal, D., Sofat, S. (2014). Intelligent transportation system for developing countries-A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 85(3): 34-38.
[38] Gumbo, T., & Moyo, T. (2020). Exploring the interoperability of public transport systems for sustainable mobility in developing cities: Lessons from Johannesburg Metropolitan City, South Africa. Sustainability, 12(15): 5875. [Crossref]
[39] Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for Business Students (7th Edition). Harlow: Pearson Education.
[40] Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone, C., Winhall, J. (2006). Transformation design. RED Paper 2. https://designblog.uniandes.edu.co/blogs/desis/files/2009/06/transformationdesignfinaldraft.pdf.
[41] Irbīte, A., Strode, A. (2016). Design thinking models in design research and education. In: Vol. 4 (2016): Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4: 488-500. [Crossref]
[42] Costa, N., Patrício, L., Morelli, N. (2018). A designedly-way of conducting qualitative research in design studies. In Proceedings of the ServDes2018 Conference: Service Design Proof of Concept. Linköping University Electronic Press, p. 164.
[43] Al-Qutaish, R.E. (2010). Quality models in software engineering literature: An analytical and comparative study. Journal of American Science, 6(3): 166-175.
[44] Duri, B., Luke, R. (2022). The structural barriers to universally accessible transport: The Tshwane (ZAF) metropolitan area study case. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 6(4): 428-442. [Crossref]
[45] Shange, N.A., Harmáček, J. (2017). Is the public transport system failing the poor: A critical analysis of the South African public transport system. Case study of Johannesburg. Masters dissertation, Palacký University, Olomouc.
[46] Venter, C., Leong, W.Y. (2018). Workshop 6 report: Wider impacts of public transport and successful implementation of desirable and beneficial projects. Research in Transportation Economics, 69: 489-493. [Crossref]
[47] Luke, R., Heyns, G.J. (2020). An analysis of the quality of public transport in Johannesburg, South Africa, using an adapted SERVQUAL model. Transportation Research Procedia, 48: 3562-3576. [Crossref]
[48] Mrníková, M., Poliak, M., Šimurková, P., Hernandez, S., Reuter, N. (2017). How important is the integration of public passenger transport. LOGI–Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 8(2): 59-68. [Crossref]
[49] Washington, O.I., Kumar, D.D., Mulemwa, A. (2021). Assessment of accessibility of public bus transportAtion in Durban by GIS-based network analysis. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 5(2): 175-189. [Crossref]
[50] Ewhrudjakpor, O., Poliaková, A., Poliak, M. (2019). The integration of passenger transport and integration barriers. Archiwum Motoryzacji, 85(3): 103-113.
[51] Leal, G.D.S.S., Guédria, W., Panetto, H. (2019). Interoperability assessment: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 106: 111-132. [Crossref]
[52] Yahia, E., Aubry, A., Panetto, H. (2012). Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems. Computers in Industry, 63(5): 443-457. [Crossref]
[53] Ralph, M. S., George, W. R. (2018). Principles of Information Systems (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[54] Arthur, J. (2021). The information legislation (PAIA, POPI, RICA) awareness of undergraduate university students: A longitudinal study. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1): 1-9. [Crossref]
[55] Mccrocklin, S. (2021). Mobile penetration in South Africa. https://www.geopoll.com/blog/mobile-penetration-south-africa/, accessed on Feb. 2, 2024.

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Hlophe, A., Afolayan, A., & Daramola, O. (2024). Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa. Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., 8(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080104
A. Hlophe, A. Afolayan, and O. Daramola, "Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa," Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31-48, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080104
@research-article{Hlophe2024IntegratedRI,
title={Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa},
author={Aphiwe Hlophe and Ayodeji Afolayan and Olawande Daramola},
journal={International Journal of Transport Development and Integration},
year={2024},
page={31-48},
doi={https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080104}
}
Aphiwe Hlophe, et al. "Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa." International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, v 8, pp 31-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080104
Aphiwe Hlophe, Ayodeji Afolayan and Olawande Daramola. "Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa." International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 8, (2024): 31-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080104
HLOPHE A, AFOLAYAN A, DARAMOLA O. Integrated Real-Time Information System for Public Commuting: Perspectives of Stakeholders in South Africa[J]. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 2024, 8(1): 31-48. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.080104