Javascript is required
[1] Campuzano, R. & González-Martínez, S., Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review. Waste Management, 54, pp. 3–12, 2016. [Crossref]
[2] Fehr, M. & Arantes, C.A., Making a case for recycling biodegradable municipal waste. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(4), pp. 483–489, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10669-015-9568-z
[3] Andreottola, G., Ragazzi, M., Foladori, P., Villa, R., Langone, M. & Rada, E.C., The unit intregrated approach for OFMSW treatment. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering, 74(1), pp. 19–26, 2012.
[4] Sánchez, C., de la Fuente, M.D.M., Narros, A., del Peso, I. & Rodríguez, E., Compari- son of modeling with empirical calculation of diffuse and fugitive methane, emissions in a Spanish landfill. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 69(3), pp. 362–372, 2019. [Crossref]
[5] Broun, R. & Sattler, M., Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional vs. bioreactor landfills. Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s Annual Confer- ence and Exhibition, 1, pp. 249–255, 2015.
[6] Cocarta, D.M., Rada, E.C., Ragazzi, M., Badea, A. & Apostol, T., A contribution for a correct vision of health impact from municipal solid waste treatments. Environmental Technology, 30(9), pp. 963–968, 2009. [Crossref]
[7] Rada, E.C., zatelli, C., Cioca, L.I. & Torretta, V., Selective collection quality index for municipal solid waste management. Sustainability, 10(1), p. 257, 2018. https://doi. org/10.3390/su10010257
[8] Ferreira, F., Avelino, C., Bentes, I., Matos, C. & Teixeira, C.A., Assessment strategies for municipal selective waste collection schemes. Waste Management, 59, pp. 3–13, 2017. [Crossref]
[9] de Oliveira, T.B. & Galvão Junior, A.C., Municipal planning in solid waste manage- ment and organization of selective collection. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 21(1), pp. 55–64, 2016. [Crossref]
[10] Lober, D.J., Why not here? The importance of context, process, and outcome on pub- lic attitudes toward siting of waste facilities. Society and Natural Resources, 9(4), pp. 375–394, 1996. [Crossref]
[11] zheng, G. & Liu, W., Same projects, different endings—Comparative case studies on NIMBY facility construction in Beijing. Cities, 73, pp. 63–70, 2018. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.010
[12] Salleh, A.H., Ahamad, M.S.S., Yusoff, M.S. & Aziz, H.A., Multiple criteria landfill site selection method incorporating the NIMBY factors. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1892, p. 130003, 2017. [Crossref]
[13] Esteves, E.M.M., Herrera, A.M.N., Esteves, V.P.P. & Morgado, C.D.R.V., Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, pp. 411–423, 2019. [Crossref]
[14] Svanberg, M., Finnsgård, C., Flodén, J. & Lundgren, J., Analyzing animal waste-to- energy supply chains: The case of horse manure. Renewable Energy, 129, pp. 830–837, 2018. [Crossref]
[15] Yang, Q., Wang, H., Larson, R. & Runge, T., Comparative study of chemical pretreat- ments of dairy manure for enhanced biomethane production. BioResources, 12(4), pp. 7363–7375, 2017. [Crossref]
[16] Antognoni, S., Ragazzi, M., Ionescu, G., Passamani, G., zanoni, S., Rada, E.C. & Torretta, V., Respirometric index as a tool for biogas generation production from poul- try manure. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(3), pp. 269–280, 2016. [Crossref]
[17] Nykänen, A.M., Hämäläinen, N., Kostia, S., Mikola, J. & Romantschuk, M., Reduction of odorants in swine manure by carbohydrate and bacterial amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(2), pp. 678–685, 2010. [Crossref]
[18] Gennen, J. & Luxen, P., Estimated loss of nitrogen via ammonia volatilisation dur- ing spreading of liquid manure on permanent grasslands. Fourrages, 2015(224), pp. 265–268, 2015.
[19] Huang, W., zhao, z., Yuan, T., Huang, W., Lei, z. & zhang, z., Low-temperature hydro- thermal pretreatment followed by dry anaerobic digestion: A sustainable strategy for manure waste management regarding energy recovery and nutrients availability. Waste Management, 70, pp. 255–262, 2017. [Crossref]
[20] Campuzano R. & González-Martínez, S., Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review. Waste Management, 54, pp. 3–12, 2016. [Crossref]
[21] Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M. & Romero, L.I., Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology, 99(15), pp. 6763–6770, 2008. [Crossref]
[22] Amani, T. & Nosrati M., Anaerobic digestion from the view point of microbiologi- cal, chemical, and operational aspects - A review. Environmental Reviews, 18(1), pp. 255–278, 2010. [Crossref]
[23] Sibisi, N.N.S., Development of an Anaerobic Digestion Strategy for the OFMSW Treat- ment and its Co-Digestion with Sewage Sludge, PhD Thesis, University of Trento, PhD in Environmental Engineering, XVIII Cycle – 2005.
[24] European Commission, Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Renewable Energy Progress Report: Brussels, 2019.
[25] Eurobserv’ER, The State of Renewable Energies in Europe, 18th EurObserv’ER Report, 2018 Edition.
[26] GSE, Rapporto statistico 2017 fonti rinnovabili (in Italian), December 2018.
[27] Heidari, M., Dutta, A., Acharia, B. & Mahmud S., A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. Journal of the Energy Institute. [Crossref]
[28] NEWAPP, Industrial Scale Hydrothermal Carbonization: New applications for wet bio- mass waste, June 2016, www.newapp-project.eu/en/ (accessed 12 April 2019).
[29] Landolfo P.G., Stato dell’arte nel compostaggio di comunità (in Italian) Ecomondo 2015.
[30] Matheri, A.N., Mbohwa, C., Belaid, M., Seodigeng, T. & Ngila, J.C., Design model selection and dimensioning of anaerobic digester for the OFMSW. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2226, pp. 846–851, 2016.
[31] Khalid, A., Arshad, M., Anjum, M., Mahmood, T. & Dawson, L., The anaerobic diges- tion of solid organic waste. Waste Management, 31(8), pp. 1737–1744, 2011. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021
[32] The EU Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy, www.covenantofmayors.eu/en/. (accessed April 12, 2019).
[33] Arpav, Rapporto rifiuti urbani, Produzione e Gestione 2017 (in Italian) Ed. 2018.
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJEPM from 2025 Vol. 10, No. 3. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact

elena cristina rada1,
luca costa2,
cecilia pradella2,
luca adami2,
marco schiavon2,
Elena Magaril3,
vincenzo torretta1
1
Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
2
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
3
Department of Environmental Economics, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
International Journal of Energy Production and Management
|
Volume 4, Issue 3, 2019
|
Pages 198-208
Received: N/A,
Revised: N/A,
Accepted: N/A,
Available online: N/A
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

One of the problems of food waste management is the acceptability of the treatment plants at local level because of the risk of odours. Anaerobic digestion as first step before composting has contributed to solve this problem, but, in the sector, it remains an opposition to large plants. That affects also food waste anaerobic digestion: people’s perception is that the stream coming at the gate of the plant is not theirs. The present paper shows an alternative to the conventional approach. The aim is to reduce the scale of the intervention giving a solution also to small municipalities or to an aggregation of small municipalities. The basic idea is suitable for adaptations depending on the local availability of manure and other plants specialised on wastewater. The integrability of these plants allows reduc- ing the costs for treating secondary streams to be managed, as discussed in the article. The extreme technological scenario is based on an anaerobic digester with unconventional pre-treatment of food waste and energy recovery, on a hydro-thermal carbonisation reactor for manure, on an ammonia separator for product recovery (by stripping), on a CO2 separator (from off-gases), on a hydro-biochar flusher for opening to land application and on mechanised small-scale composters for small communities. The principles of the circular economy are adopted, but the economic balance is affected by the transport costs of the products. The suitability of this approach to medium income countries is discussed too.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion, circular economy, decentralization, discarded biomass, environmental sustainability, food waste, HTC, manure, renewable energy, waste management
Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1] Campuzano, R. & González-Martínez, S., Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review. Waste Management, 54, pp. 3–12, 2016. [Crossref]
[2] Fehr, M. & Arantes, C.A., Making a case for recycling biodegradable municipal waste. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(4), pp. 483–489, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10669-015-9568-z
[3] Andreottola, G., Ragazzi, M., Foladori, P., Villa, R., Langone, M. & Rada, E.C., The unit intregrated approach for OFMSW treatment. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series C: Electrical Engineering, 74(1), pp. 19–26, 2012.
[4] Sánchez, C., de la Fuente, M.D.M., Narros, A., del Peso, I. & Rodríguez, E., Compari- son of modeling with empirical calculation of diffuse and fugitive methane, emissions in a Spanish landfill. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 69(3), pp. 362–372, 2019. [Crossref]
[5] Broun, R. & Sattler, M., Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional vs. bioreactor landfills. Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association’s Annual Confer- ence and Exhibition, 1, pp. 249–255, 2015.
[6] Cocarta, D.M., Rada, E.C., Ragazzi, M., Badea, A. & Apostol, T., A contribution for a correct vision of health impact from municipal solid waste treatments. Environmental Technology, 30(9), pp. 963–968, 2009. [Crossref]
[7] Rada, E.C., zatelli, C., Cioca, L.I. & Torretta, V., Selective collection quality index for municipal solid waste management. Sustainability, 10(1), p. 257, 2018. https://doi. org/10.3390/su10010257
[8] Ferreira, F., Avelino, C., Bentes, I., Matos, C. & Teixeira, C.A., Assessment strategies for municipal selective waste collection schemes. Waste Management, 59, pp. 3–13, 2017. [Crossref]
[9] de Oliveira, T.B. & Galvão Junior, A.C., Municipal planning in solid waste manage- ment and organization of selective collection. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 21(1), pp. 55–64, 2016. [Crossref]
[10] Lober, D.J., Why not here? The importance of context, process, and outcome on pub- lic attitudes toward siting of waste facilities. Society and Natural Resources, 9(4), pp. 375–394, 1996. [Crossref]
[11] zheng, G. & Liu, W., Same projects, different endings—Comparative case studies on NIMBY facility construction in Beijing. Cities, 73, pp. 63–70, 2018. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.010
[12] Salleh, A.H., Ahamad, M.S.S., Yusoff, M.S. & Aziz, H.A., Multiple criteria landfill site selection method incorporating the NIMBY factors. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1892, p. 130003, 2017. [Crossref]
[13] Esteves, E.M.M., Herrera, A.M.N., Esteves, V.P.P. & Morgado, C.D.R.V., Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, pp. 411–423, 2019. [Crossref]
[14] Svanberg, M., Finnsgård, C., Flodén, J. & Lundgren, J., Analyzing animal waste-to- energy supply chains: The case of horse manure. Renewable Energy, 129, pp. 830–837, 2018. [Crossref]
[15] Yang, Q., Wang, H., Larson, R. & Runge, T., Comparative study of chemical pretreat- ments of dairy manure for enhanced biomethane production. BioResources, 12(4), pp. 7363–7375, 2017. [Crossref]
[16] Antognoni, S., Ragazzi, M., Ionescu, G., Passamani, G., zanoni, S., Rada, E.C. & Torretta, V., Respirometric index as a tool for biogas generation production from poul- try manure. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(3), pp. 269–280, 2016. [Crossref]
[17] Nykänen, A.M., Hämäläinen, N., Kostia, S., Mikola, J. & Romantschuk, M., Reduction of odorants in swine manure by carbohydrate and bacterial amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(2), pp. 678–685, 2010. [Crossref]
[18] Gennen, J. & Luxen, P., Estimated loss of nitrogen via ammonia volatilisation dur- ing spreading of liquid manure on permanent grasslands. Fourrages, 2015(224), pp. 265–268, 2015.
[19] Huang, W., zhao, z., Yuan, T., Huang, W., Lei, z. & zhang, z., Low-temperature hydro- thermal pretreatment followed by dry anaerobic digestion: A sustainable strategy for manure waste management regarding energy recovery and nutrients availability. Waste Management, 70, pp. 255–262, 2017. [Crossref]
[20] Campuzano R. & González-Martínez, S., Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review. Waste Management, 54, pp. 3–12, 2016. [Crossref]
[21] Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M. & Romero, L.I., Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology, 99(15), pp. 6763–6770, 2008. [Crossref]
[22] Amani, T. & Nosrati M., Anaerobic digestion from the view point of microbiologi- cal, chemical, and operational aspects - A review. Environmental Reviews, 18(1), pp. 255–278, 2010. [Crossref]
[23] Sibisi, N.N.S., Development of an Anaerobic Digestion Strategy for the OFMSW Treat- ment and its Co-Digestion with Sewage Sludge, PhD Thesis, University of Trento, PhD in Environmental Engineering, XVIII Cycle – 2005.
[24] European Commission, Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Renewable Energy Progress Report: Brussels, 2019.
[25] Eurobserv’ER, The State of Renewable Energies in Europe, 18th EurObserv’ER Report, 2018 Edition.
[26] GSE, Rapporto statistico 2017 fonti rinnovabili (in Italian), December 2018.
[27] Heidari, M., Dutta, A., Acharia, B. & Mahmud S., A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. Journal of the Energy Institute. [Crossref]
[28] NEWAPP, Industrial Scale Hydrothermal Carbonization: New applications for wet bio- mass waste, June 2016, www.newapp-project.eu/en/ (accessed 12 April 2019).
[29] Landolfo P.G., Stato dell’arte nel compostaggio di comunità (in Italian) Ecomondo 2015.
[30] Matheri, A.N., Mbohwa, C., Belaid, M., Seodigeng, T. & Ngila, J.C., Design model selection and dimensioning of anaerobic digester for the OFMSW. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2226, pp. 846–851, 2016.
[31] Khalid, A., Arshad, M., Anjum, M., Mahmood, T. & Dawson, L., The anaerobic diges- tion of solid organic waste. Waste Management, 31(8), pp. 1737–1744, 2011. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021
[32] The EU Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy, www.covenantofmayors.eu/en/. (accessed April 12, 2019).
[33] Arpav, Rapporto rifiuti urbani, Produzione e Gestione 2017 (in Italian) Ed. 2018.
Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Rada, E. C., Costa, L., Pradella, C., Adami, L., Schiavon, M., Magaril, E., & Torretta, V. (2019). Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact. Int. J. Energy Prod. Manag., 4(3), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208
E. C. Rada, L. Costa, C. Pradella, L. Adami, M. Schiavon, E. Magaril, and V. Torretta, "Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact," Int. J. Energy Prod. Manag., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 198-208, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208
@research-article{Rada2019UnconventionalSB,
title={Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact},
author={Elena Cristina Rada and Luca Costa and Cecilia Pradella and Luca Adami and Marco Schiavon and Elena Magaril and Vincenzo Torretta},
journal={International Journal of Energy Production and Management},
year={2019},
page={198-208},
doi={https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208}
}
Elena Cristina Rada, et al. "Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact." International Journal of Energy Production and Management, v 4, pp 198-208. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208
Elena Cristina Rada, Luca Costa, Cecilia Pradella, Luca Adami, Marco Schiavon, Elena Magaril and Vincenzo Torretta. "Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact." International Journal of Energy Production and Management, 4, (2019): 198-208. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208
RADA E C， COSTA L， PRADELLA C， et al. Unconventional Small-Scale Biogas Production with Reduced Local Impact[J]. International Journal of Energy Production and Management， 2019， 4(3)： 198-208. https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208