Javascript is required
[1] Wang, G., Chen, H., Li, Y., Jin, M. (2012). On received-signal-strength based localization with unknown transmit power and path loss exponent. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1(5): 536-539. [Crossref]
[2] Ergen, S.C., Tetikol, H.S., Kontik, M., Sevlian, R., Rajagopal, R., Varaiya, P. (2013). RSSI-fingerprinting-based mobile phone localization with route constraints. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(1): 423-428. [Crossref]
[3] Salman, N., Ghogho, M., Kemp, A.H. (2011). On the joint estimation of the RSS-based location and path-loss exponent. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1(1): 34-37. [Crossref]
[4] Basheer, M.R., Jagannathan, S. (2013). Localization and tracking of objects using cross-correlation of shadow fading noise. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(10): 2293-2305. [Crossref]
[5] Elmutasim, I. (2023). A brief review of massive MIMO technology for the next generation. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 20(2): 262-269.
[6] El-Sallabi, H. (2011). Terrain partial obstruction LOS path loss model for rural environments. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 10: 151-154. [Crossref]
[7] He, R., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., Ding, J., Guan, K. (2012). Analysis of the relation between Fresnel zone and path loss exponent based on two-ray model. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 11: 208-211. [Crossref]
[8] Xia, H., Bertoni, H.L., Maciel, L.R., Lindsay-Stewart, A., Rowe, R. (2002). Radio propagation characteristics for line-of-sight microcellular and personal communications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 41(10): 1439-1447. [Crossref]
[9] Oda, Y., Tsunekawa, K., Hata, M. (2000). Advanced LOS path-loss model in microcellular mobile communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 49(6): 2121-2125. [Crossref]
[10] Milstein, L.B., Schilling, D.L., Pickholtz, R.L., Erceg, V., et al. (2002). On the feasibility of a CDMA overlay for personal communications networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 10(4): 655-668. [Crossref]
[11] Hernandez-Valdez, G., Cruz-Perez, F.A., Lara-Rodriguez, D. (2008). Sensitivity of the system performance to the propagation parameters in LOS microcellular environments. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(6): 3488-3509. [Crossref]
[12] Feuerstein, M.J., Blackard, K.L., Rappaport, T.S., Seidel, S.Y., Xia, H.H. (1994). Path loss, delay spread, and outage models as functions of antenna height for microcellular system design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 43(3): 487-498. [Crossref]
[13] Elmutasim, I.E., Mohd, I.I. (2020). Radio propagation in evaporation duct using SHF range. Publisher International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology IJAST Journal: Science and Engineering Research Support Society, SERSC Australia.
[14] Perera, S.C.M., Williamson, A.G., Rowe, G.B. (1999). Prediction of breakpoint distance in microcellular environments. Electronics Letters, 35(14): 1135-1136. [Crossref]
[15] Galvan-Tejada, G.M., Aguilar-Torrentera, J. (2019). Analysis of propagation for wireless sensor networks in outdoors. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 83: 153-175. [Crossref]
[16] Politi, R.R., Tanyel, S. (2025). Minimizing delay at closely spaced signalized intersections through green time ratio optimization: A hybrid approach with k-means clustering and genetic algorithms. IEEE Access, 13: 43981-43999. [Crossref]
[17] Jiang, T., Zhang, J., Tang, P., Tian, L., et al. (2021). 3GPP standardized 5G channel model for IIoT scenarios: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(11): 8799-8815. [Crossref]
[18] Safjan, K., D'Amico, V., Bultmann, D., Martin-Sacristan, D., Saadani, A., Schoneich, H. (2011). Assessing 3GPP LTE-advanced as IMT-advanced technology: The WINNER+ evaluation group approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(2): 92-100. [Crossref]
[19] Riviello, D.G., Di Stasio, F., Tuninato, R. (2022). Performance analysis of multi-user MIMO schemes under realistic 3GPP 3-D channel model for 5G mmWave cellular networks. Electronics, 11(3): 330. [Crossref]
[20] Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., et al. (2024). Interpreting black-box models: A review on explainable artificial intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1): 45-74. [Crossref]
[21] Elmezughi, M.K., Salih, O., Afullo, T.J., Duffy, K.J. (2022). Comparative analysis of major machine-learning-based path loss models for enclosed indoor channels. Sensors, 22(13): 4967. [Crossref]
[22] Fernández, H., Rubio, L., Rodrigo Peñarrocha, V.M., Reig, J. (2024). Dual-slope path loss model for integrating vehicular sensing applications in urban and suburban environments. Sensors, 24(13): 4334. [Crossref]
[23] Mi, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Wei, J. (2024). Measurement-based improved two-ray model for maritime scenarios. In 2024 6th International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE), Guangzhou, China, pp. 973-977. [Crossref]
[24] Elmutasim, I.E., Mohamed, I.I., Bilal, K.H. (2023). Seawater salinity modelling based on electromagnetic wave characterization. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13(4): 4112-4118. [Crossref]
[25] Sun, Z., Liu, T., Wang, L. (2020). Analysis of DME signal strength in approach direction under two-ray model. In 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Weihai, China, pp. 105-109. [Crossref]
[26] El-Sallabi, H., Qaraqe, K. (2015). Correction terms of ground and water reflection surfaces for Perera’s breakpoint distance model. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 15, 786-789. [Crossref]
[27] Kustysheva, I. (2017). Consideration of environmental factors in planning and development of urban areas. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 262(1): 012166. [Crossref]
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJCMEM from 2025 Vol. 13, No. 3. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration

imadeldin elsayed elmutasim*
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA), 26600 Pekan, Malaysia
International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements
|
Volume 13, Issue 2, 2025
|
Pages 251-257
Received: 05-01-2025,
Revised: 06-09-2025,
Accepted: 06-19-2025,
Available online: 06-29-2025
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

Wireless propagation is a crucial technology in modern advancements, requiring highly accurate prediction. Path loss propagation is influenced by various parameters that must be accounted for to predict the signal route over the entire distance and refine breakpoint models with precise interference calculations. The breakpoint distance is defined as the point separating two distinct trends of path loss, each following a different path loss exponent. This paper reviews the Fresnel, Perera, and True breakpoints in a dual-slope model reference at 2 GHz, using a fixed exponent of n₁ = 2 before the breakpoint and n₂ = 4 after. It then proposes a distance-adaptive exponent model that considers a steady path by incorporating a flexible exponent based on environmental factors, mitigating the abrupt change in path loss exponent at breakpoints observed in the dual-slope model, which leads to discontinuities. The comparison results under similar conditions demonstrate that both models perform similarly over short distances of up to 100 meters, while the dual-slope model is more suitable for distances of up to 1 km. However, due to its stability and consistency, the distance-adaptive exponent model is more appropriate for longer distances. Validation using RMSE, followed by comparative analysis, confirms that our model offers higher stability in interference scenarios. These findings will assist researchers and wireless designers in predicting and selecting the most accurate and effective propagation model.

Keywords: Wireless technology, Dual slope, Signal propagation, Breakpoint, Path loss, Two ray model

1. Introduction

Wireless communication plays a crucial role in modern technology, enabling high-speed data transfer for applications such as 5G, IoT, and smart city infrastructure. One fundamental challenge while designing wireless networks is accurately modeling signal propagation, which directly impacts network planning, interference management, and coverage optimization. Ideally, path loss models are essential in predicting the attenuation of transmitted signals over distance and are widely used in radio wave propagation studies.

Positioning strategies relying on measured signal strength depend greatly on the precision of RF estimations regarding received power [1-5]. These demands have led researchers in RF prediction to re-evaluate the criteria and precision of current breakpoint location and path loss estimation [6, 7].

Moreover, despite the dramatic expansion of wireless cellular communication networks over the past two decades, they continue to face increasing interference, which degrades service quality. This interference arises from suboptimal cellular network design and inadequate optimization, primarily due to the absence of highly accurate propagation models [8]. No RF path loss model can precisely predict signal intensity, as each model has specific validity constraints and is tailored to particular RF scenarios. To enhance their applicability to real-world RF propagation conditions without causing environmental disruptions, it is vital to understand their rationality ranges and apply necessary correction factors [9, 10].

Traditionally, path loss models fall into two categories: single-slope models, like Free-Space Path Loss, and dual-slope models, which adjust the path loss exponent at a defined breakpoint. The Dual-Slope Path Loss Model provides a more realistic representation of signal attenuation by considering two distinct propagation regions. The first region, before the breakpoint, is dominated by free-space propagation, where the path loss exponent is approximately n1 = 2. Beyond the breakpoint, additional factors such as ground reflection, diffraction, and obstructions contribute to increased signal attenuation, resulting in a higher path loss exponent of n2 = 4, as noted in reference [11].

In contrast, the traditional Dual-Slope Model suffers from abrupt changes in the path loss exponent at the breakpoint, which can lead to discontinuities in signal prediction. This can introduce significant errors, especially in urban and suburban environments, where signal behavior is influenced by multipath effects, terrain variations, and environmental clutter [8, 12]. Researches like Feuerstein et al. [12] and Elmutasim and Mohd [13] define the breakpoint as the point at which the Fresnel zone starts interfering with the ground, while Perera et al. [14] demonstrated that this model exhibits significant discrepancies when assessed against various measurement campaign findings.

Researchers have developed empirical refinement models, such as the Perera breakpoint, which adjusts the breakpoint distance to match suburban and urban propagation data better [15, 16]. However, this approach still uses fixed exponents before and after the breakpoint rather than responding to environmental variability. Other wireless communication design models include standard models such as 3GPP and WINNER II. Such models use environment-specific parameters and empirical exponents; however, they are rigid and do not allow for smooth changes in exponents. Their breakpoint lengths are frequency-dependent and lack physical [17-19]. Another aspect that recent studies have examined is the use of machine learning (ML) models for path loss prediction, which include neural networks and regression trees. These models frequently outperform traditional equations in site-specific deployments; however, they necessitate large, labelled datasets and function as black boxes, which limits their interpretability and portability [20, 21].

To overcome these limitations, we propose distance-adaptive exponent (DAE) model as an adjustable model, where the path loss exponent n varies continuously with distance rather than switching abruptly at a predefined breakpoint. The key contributions of this study are as follows:

• Proposal of DAE model that dynamically adapts the path loss exponent as a function of distance.

• Integration of multiple breakpoints (Fresnel, Perera, and True breakpoints) to refine transition regions between free-space propagation and multipath-dominated environments.

• Comparison of traditional vs. distance-adaptive exponent (DAE) model, highlighting improvements in accuracy and continuity.

• Validation through MATLAB simulations, demonstrating reduced error in path loss prediction.

2. Rationale for Breakpoint Models Selection

3. Breakpoint Distances Models

4. Result and Discussion

5. Conclusion

This work proposes an improved dual-slope path loss model with an adjustable path loss exponent that seamlessly transitions between different propagation settings, particularly above 1 km, where the dual-slope model is severely prone to attenuation. The proposed technique computes path loss in a stepwise manner across Fresnel, Perera, and True breakpoints, resulting in steady and higher accuracy in urban and suburban propagation settings. The results indicate that frequency plays a crucial role, with higher frequencies experiencing greater path loss over distance. This underscores the importance of careful frequency selection. However, while the dual-slope model can be effective at shorter distances not exceeding a few kilometers, the adjustable model provides a more disciplined behavior by dynamically altering the exponent as a function of distance. This eliminates the harsh discontinuities found in typical dual-slope models, especially over kilometer-scale distances. Despite the use of an adjustable path loss exponent enhances accuracy by allowing for a seamless transition in attenuation behaviour. However, it introduces new model parameters, including the tuning factor, which may raise the challenge. But in fact, this difficulty is manageable and does not require large adaptations to existing wireless networks. The adaptability feature could be predefined for various environments (urban, rural, suburban), or dynamically adjusted using simple threshold logic or automated tuning based on terrain classification. Future studies will integrate intelligent reflection with breakpoint placements.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Sohar University in Oman for providing the resources and academic environment that facilitated the successful completion of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1] Wang, G., Chen, H., Li, Y., Jin, M. (2012). On received-signal-strength based localization with unknown transmit power and path loss exponent. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1(5): 536-539. [Crossref]
[2] Ergen, S.C., Tetikol, H.S., Kontik, M., Sevlian, R., Rajagopal, R., Varaiya, P. (2013). RSSI-fingerprinting-based mobile phone localization with route constraints. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 63(1): 423-428. [Crossref]
[3] Salman, N., Ghogho, M., Kemp, A.H. (2011). On the joint estimation of the RSS-based location and path-loss exponent. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1(1): 34-37. [Crossref]
[4] Basheer, M.R., Jagannathan, S. (2013). Localization and tracking of objects using cross-correlation of shadow fading noise. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(10): 2293-2305. [Crossref]
[5] Elmutasim, I. (2023). A brief review of massive MIMO technology for the next generation. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 20(2): 262-269.
[6] El-Sallabi, H. (2011). Terrain partial obstruction LOS path loss model for rural environments. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 10: 151-154. [Crossref]
[7] He, R., Zhong, Z., Ai, B., Ding, J., Guan, K. (2012). Analysis of the relation between Fresnel zone and path loss exponent based on two-ray model. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 11: 208-211. [Crossref]
[8] Xia, H., Bertoni, H.L., Maciel, L.R., Lindsay-Stewart, A., Rowe, R. (2002). Radio propagation characteristics for line-of-sight microcellular and personal communications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 41(10): 1439-1447. [Crossref]
[9] Oda, Y., Tsunekawa, K., Hata, M. (2000). Advanced LOS path-loss model in microcellular mobile communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 49(6): 2121-2125. [Crossref]
[10] Milstein, L.B., Schilling, D.L., Pickholtz, R.L., Erceg, V., et al. (2002). On the feasibility of a CDMA overlay for personal communications networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 10(4): 655-668. [Crossref]
[11] Hernandez-Valdez, G., Cruz-Perez, F.A., Lara-Rodriguez, D. (2008). Sensitivity of the system performance to the propagation parameters in LOS microcellular environments. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(6): 3488-3509. [Crossref]
[12] Feuerstein, M.J., Blackard, K.L., Rappaport, T.S., Seidel, S.Y., Xia, H.H. (1994). Path loss, delay spread, and outage models as functions of antenna height for microcellular system design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 43(3): 487-498. [Crossref]
[13] Elmutasim, I.E., Mohd, I.I. (2020). Radio propagation in evaporation duct using SHF range. Publisher International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology IJAST Journal: Science and Engineering Research Support Society, SERSC Australia.
[14] Perera, S.C.M., Williamson, A.G., Rowe, G.B. (1999). Prediction of breakpoint distance in microcellular environments. Electronics Letters, 35(14): 1135-1136. [Crossref]
[15] Galvan-Tejada, G.M., Aguilar-Torrentera, J. (2019). Analysis of propagation for wireless sensor networks in outdoors. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 83: 153-175. [Crossref]
[16] Politi, R.R., Tanyel, S. (2025). Minimizing delay at closely spaced signalized intersections through green time ratio optimization: A hybrid approach with k-means clustering and genetic algorithms. IEEE Access, 13: 43981-43999. [Crossref]
[17] Jiang, T., Zhang, J., Tang, P., Tian, L., et al. (2021). 3GPP standardized 5G channel model for IIoT scenarios: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(11): 8799-8815. [Crossref]
[18] Safjan, K., D'Amico, V., Bultmann, D., Martin-Sacristan, D., Saadani, A., Schoneich, H. (2011). Assessing 3GPP LTE-advanced as IMT-advanced technology: The WINNER+ evaluation group approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(2): 92-100. [Crossref]
[19] Riviello, D.G., Di Stasio, F., Tuninato, R. (2022). Performance analysis of multi-user MIMO schemes under realistic 3GPP 3-D channel model for 5G mmWave cellular networks. Electronics, 11(3): 330. [Crossref]
[20] Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., et al. (2024). Interpreting black-box models: A review on explainable artificial intelligence. Cognitive Computation, 16(1): 45-74. [Crossref]
[21] Elmezughi, M.K., Salih, O., Afullo, T.J., Duffy, K.J. (2022). Comparative analysis of major machine-learning-based path loss models for enclosed indoor channels. Sensors, 22(13): 4967. [Crossref]
[22] Fernández, H., Rubio, L., Rodrigo Peñarrocha, V.M., Reig, J. (2024). Dual-slope path loss model for integrating vehicular sensing applications in urban and suburban environments. Sensors, 24(13): 4334. [Crossref]
[23] Mi, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, X., Wei, J. (2024). Measurement-based improved two-ray model for maritime scenarios. In 2024 6th International Conference on Communications, Information System and Computer Engineering (CISCE), Guangzhou, China, pp. 973-977. [Crossref]
[24] Elmutasim, I.E., Mohamed, I.I., Bilal, K.H. (2023). Seawater salinity modelling based on electromagnetic wave characterization. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13(4): 4112-4118. [Crossref]
[25] Sun, Z., Liu, T., Wang, L. (2020). Analysis of DME signal strength in approach direction under two-ray model. In 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Weihai, China, pp. 105-109. [Crossref]
[26] El-Sallabi, H., Qaraqe, K. (2015). Correction terms of ground and water reflection surfaces for Perera’s breakpoint distance model. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 15, 786-789. [Crossref]
[27] Kustysheva, I. (2017). Consideration of environmental factors in planning and development of urban areas. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 262(1): 012166. [Crossref]

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Elmutasim, I. E. (2025). Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration. Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., 13(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.130204
I. E. Elmutasim, "Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration," Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 251-257, 2025. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.130204
@research-article{Elmutasim2025RefiningTD,
title={Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration},
author={Imadeldin Elsayed Elmutasim},
journal={International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements},
year={2025},
page={251-257},
doi={https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.130204}
}
Imadeldin Elsayed Elmutasim, et al. "Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, v 13, pp 251-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.130204
Imadeldin Elsayed Elmutasim. "Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 13, (2025): 251-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.130204
ELMUTASIM I E. Refining the Dual-Slope Path Loss Model with a Distance-Adaptive Exponent and Multi-Breakpoint Calibration[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 2025, 13(2): 251-257. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.130204