Javascript is required
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJCMEM from 2025 Vol. 13, No. 3. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching

lateef talab obaid1,
hasanain a. abdul wahhab2,
Miqdam T. Chaichan3*,
Mohammed A. Fayad4,
gazy f. al-sumaily4
1
Manufacture of Cylinder Department, State Company for Gas Filling and Services, Ministry of Oil, Al-Kut 35048, Iraq
2
Training and Workshop Center, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad 35050, Iraq
3
Energy and Renewable Energies Technology Center, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad 35050, Iraq
4
Energy and Renewable Energies Technology Center, University of Technology, Baghdad 35050, Iraq
International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements
|
Volume 11, Issue 4, 2023
|
Pages 245-250
Received: 05-19-2023,
Revised: 08-20-2023,
Accepted: 09-12-2023,
Available online: 12-29-2023
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

The quenching of a pre-mixed counter flame was studied experimentally, as described in this paper. Experimental research has been done on flames spreading in methane/air mixes in counter burners with various burner diameters. It has been determined how the counter burner diameter changes, the methane/air mixing ratio affects the flame burning velocity, and the quenching diameter. In this study, the quenching diameter was examined in relation to altering burner diameter (9, 12, 16, 19, and 23 mm) using a digital image processing technique. In counter flame, significant results were attained. The geometry of the burner edges and the air and fuel velocity have an impact on the quenching diameter in the counter flow. The top and bottom flame disc quenching diameters are nearly equal for both lean and rich combinations and grow with the burner diameter. The values of the quenching distance were smaller than the quenching diameter at the wide range of the equivalence ratio (0.46 < φ < 1.57) for mixtures, and this behavior was likely caused by the dead space.

Keywords: quenching flame, premixed counter flame, quenching diameter, burning velocity, counter burner


Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Obaid, L. T., Wahhab, H. A. A., Chaichan, M. T., Fayad, M. A., & Al-sumaily, G. F. (2023). Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching. Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., 11(4), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110406
L. T. Obaid, H. A. A. Wahhab, M. T. Chaichan, M. A. Fayad, and G. F. Al-sumaily, "Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching," Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 245-250, 2023. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110406
@research-article{Obaid2023InfluenceOB,
title={Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching},
author={Lateef Talab Obaid and Hasanain A. Abdul Wahhab and Miqdam T. Chaichan and Mohammed A. Fayad and Gazy F. Al-Sumaily},
journal={International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements},
year={2023},
page={245-250},
doi={https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110406}
}
Lateef Talab Obaid, et al. "Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, v 11, pp 245-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110406
Lateef Talab Obaid, Hasanain A. Abdul Wahhab, Miqdam T. Chaichan, Mohammed A. Fayad and Gazy F. Al-Sumaily. "Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 11, (2023): 245-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110406
Obaid L. T., Wahhab H. A. A., CHAICHAN M T, et al. Influence of Burner Diameter on Premixed Flame Shape and Quenching[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 2023, 11(4): 245-250. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijcmem.110406