Javascript is required
1.
Parsi, M., Vieira, R., Sajeev, S.K., Mclaury, B.S. & Shirazi, S.A., Experimental study of erosion in vertical slug/churn flow. Corrosion, 2015.
2.
Taitel, Y. & Dukler, A.E., A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow. AIChE Journal, 22, pp. 47–55, 1976. https://doi. org/10.1002/aic.690220105
3.
Mandhane, J.M., Gregory, G.A. & Aziz, K., A flow pattern map for gas-liquid flow in horizontal pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1(4), pp. 537–553, 1974. [Crossref]
4.
Omebere-lyari,N.K. & Azzopardi, B.J., A study of flow patterns for gas/liquid flow in small diameter tubes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 85(2), pp. 180–192, 2007. [Crossref]
5.
Lin, S. & Kew, P.A., Pressure fluctuation and flow regimes of air-water flow in a small tube. Experimental Heat Transfer, 14(2), pp. 135–144, 2001. https://doi. org/10.1080/08916150121275
6.
Xu, L.J. & Xu, L.A., Gas/liquid two-phase flow regime identification by ultrasonic tomography. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8, pp. 145–155, 1997. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0955-5986(98)00002-8
7.
Mukherjee, T., Das, G. & Ray, S., Sensor-based flow pattern detection–gas-liquid-liq- uid upflow through a vertical pipe. AIChE Journal, 60, pp. 3362–3375, 2014. https:// doi.org/10.1002/aic.14488
8.
Oon, C.S., Ateeq, M., Shaw, A., Wylie, S., AI-Shamma’a, A. & Kazi, S.N., Detection of the gas-liquid two-phase flow regimes using non-intrusive microwave cylindrical cav- ity sensor. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 30(17), pp. 2241–2255, 2016. [Crossref]
9.
Naser, M.A., Elshafei, M. & Sarkhi, A.A., Artificial neural network application for multiphase flow patterns detection: a new approach. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 145, pp. 548–564, 2016. [Crossref]
10.
Rosa, E.S., Salgado, R.M., Ohishi, T. & Mastelari, N., Performance comparison of arti- ficial neural networks and expert systems applied to flow pattern identification in verti- cal ascendant gas and liquid flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 36(9), pp. 738–754, 2010. [Crossref]
11.
Wu, H., Zhou, F. & Wu, Y., Intelligent identification system of flow regime of oil-gas- water multiphase flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 27(3), pp. 459–475, 2001. [Crossref]
12.
Hernandez, L., Julia, J.E., Chiva, S., Paranjape, S. & Ishii, M., Fast classification of two-phase flow regimes based on conductivity signals and artificial neural net- works. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, pp. 1511–1521, 2006. https://doi. org/10.1088/0957-0233/17/6/032
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJCMEM from 2025 Vol. 13, No. 3. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach

Jian Hua Zhu1,
Ritesh Munjal1,2,
Ani Sivaram2,
Santhiyapillai Rajeevan Paul2,
Jing Tian2,
Guillaume Jolivet1
1
Singapore Well Testing Center, Schlumberger, Singapore
2
Institute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements
|
Volume 10, Issue 1, 2022
|
Pages 26-37
Received: N/A,
Revised: N/A,
Accepted: N/A,
Available online: N/A
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

The presence of intermittent flow regime such as slug flow could cause issues to oil-gas well pipe- line-riser structures due to large fluctuations in pressure, leading to the production rate reduction and damage in the pipe structure. Monitoring multiphase flow regimes in production pipe systems is thus important. There are nowadays increasing use of multiphase flowmeter (MPFM) for well production flowrate metering. The associated phase fraction and flowrate measurement sensors in MPFMs could be potentially employed for multiphase-flow regime detection with no additional component required. In this study, a machine learning model is proposed to infer multiphase-flow regime from the measure- ments of a vertically installed gamma-ray and Venturi-based MPFM. Flow loop tests have been carried out at Singapore Well Testing Center with flows of various flow regimes observed at the horizontal inlet pipe section, such as dispersed bubbly, stratified, intermittent (slug) and annular flow regimes. The flow regime has been determined by visualization from a side glass in the flow loop pipe section and from real-time images reconstructed by an electrical-capacitance tomography system. The MPFM real-time measurements and derived or calculated data (such as Venturi differential pressure and gamma-ray mixture density) are then used as machine learning training data, with the flow regimes to be the train- ing target. Various machine learning methods have been experimented, such as convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and CNN-LSTM. It has been found that LSTM method with regularization, balancing and logarithmic normalization of the calculated parameters can achieve the highest accuracy on flow regime prediction (99.6%). This study is the first attempt to pre- dict flow regime at horizontal entrance section upstream of an MPFM with measurements made at a vertical Venturi throat section. The study also proves that flow regime could be accurately predicted by a gamma-ray and Venturi-based MPFM.

Keywords: Flow regime detection, Gamma-ray, Machine learning, Multiphase flow, Multiphase flowmeter

1. Introduction

2. Methodology

3. Results

4. Conclusion

References
1.
Parsi, M., Vieira, R., Sajeev, S.K., Mclaury, B.S. & Shirazi, S.A., Experimental study of erosion in vertical slug/churn flow. Corrosion, 2015.
2.
Taitel, Y. & Dukler, A.E., A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow. AIChE Journal, 22, pp. 47–55, 1976. https://doi. org/10.1002/aic.690220105
3.
Mandhane, J.M., Gregory, G.A. & Aziz, K., A flow pattern map for gas-liquid flow in horizontal pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1(4), pp. 537–553, 1974. [Crossref]
4.
Omebere-lyari,N.K. & Azzopardi, B.J., A study of flow patterns for gas/liquid flow in small diameter tubes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 85(2), pp. 180–192, 2007. [Crossref]
5.
Lin, S. & Kew, P.A., Pressure fluctuation and flow regimes of air-water flow in a small tube. Experimental Heat Transfer, 14(2), pp. 135–144, 2001. https://doi. org/10.1080/08916150121275
6.
Xu, L.J. & Xu, L.A., Gas/liquid two-phase flow regime identification by ultrasonic tomography. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8, pp. 145–155, 1997. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0955-5986(98)00002-8
7.
Mukherjee, T., Das, G. & Ray, S., Sensor-based flow pattern detection–gas-liquid-liq- uid upflow through a vertical pipe. AIChE Journal, 60, pp. 3362–3375, 2014. https:// doi.org/10.1002/aic.14488
8.
Oon, C.S., Ateeq, M., Shaw, A., Wylie, S., AI-Shamma’a, A. & Kazi, S.N., Detection of the gas-liquid two-phase flow regimes using non-intrusive microwave cylindrical cav- ity sensor. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, 30(17), pp. 2241–2255, 2016. [Crossref]
9.
Naser, M.A., Elshafei, M. & Sarkhi, A.A., Artificial neural network application for multiphase flow patterns detection: a new approach. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 145, pp. 548–564, 2016. [Crossref]
10.
Rosa, E.S., Salgado, R.M., Ohishi, T. & Mastelari, N., Performance comparison of arti- ficial neural networks and expert systems applied to flow pattern identification in verti- cal ascendant gas and liquid flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 36(9), pp. 738–754, 2010. [Crossref]
11.
Wu, H., Zhou, F. & Wu, Y., Intelligent identification system of flow regime of oil-gas- water multiphase flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 27(3), pp. 459–475, 2001. [Crossref]
12.
Hernandez, L., Julia, J.E., Chiva, S., Paranjape, S. & Ishii, M., Fast classification of two-phase flow regimes based on conductivity signals and artificial neural net- works. Measurement Science and Technology, 17, pp. 1511–1521, 2006. https://doi. org/10.1088/0957-0233/17/6/032

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Zhu, J. H., Munjal, R., Sivaram, A., Paul, S. R., Tian, J., & Jolivet, G. (2022). Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach. Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., 10(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N1-26-37
J. H. Zhu, R. Munjal, A. Sivaram, S. R. Paul, J. Tian, and G. Jolivet, "Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach," Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 26-37, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N1-26-37
@research-article{Zhu2022FlowRD,
title={Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach},
author={Jian Hua Zhu and Ritesh Munjal and Ani Sivaram and Santhiyapillai Rajeevan Paul and Jing Tian and Guillaume Jolivet},
journal={International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements},
year={2022},
page={26-37},
doi={https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N1-26-37}
}
Jian Hua Zhu, et al. "Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, v 10, pp 26-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N1-26-37
Jian Hua Zhu, Ritesh Munjal, Ani Sivaram, Santhiyapillai Rajeevan Paul, Jing Tian and Guillaume Jolivet. "Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 10, (2022): 26-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N1-26-37
ZHU J H, MUNJAL R, SIVARAM A, et al. Flow Regime Detection Using Gamma-Ray-Based Multiphase Flowmeter: A Machine Learning Approach[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 2022, 10(1): 26-37. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V10-N1-26-37