Javascript is required
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJCMEM from 2025 Vol. 13, No. 3. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test

marco nicola mastrone,
lorenzo fraccaroli,
franco concli
Free University of Bolzano/Bozen, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bolzano, Italy
International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements
|
Volume 9, Issue 3, 2021
|
Pages 249-260
Received: N/A,
Revised: N/A,
Accepted: N/A,
Available online: N/A
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

The correct prediction of ductile fracture of mechanical components requires the knowledge of physical quantities that are in the plastic field. This region is characterized by non-linearities, and the classical yield criteria cannot be applied since they work only in the elastic field. It has been observed that parameters such as stress triaxiality and plastic strain play a determinant role in failure mechanisms. Thanks to simulation software, it is possible to implement the virtual models capable of calculating these parameters numerically by solving partial differential equations. These parameters can then be used to describe the fracture locus of a material that, in turn, allows to predict failure of a component. In this work, the Rice and Tracey damage model was calibrated for an aluminum alloy and validated on a punch test exploiting Finite Element Analysis. Good agreement between experimental observations and numerical results was obtained, demonstrating the capability of the considered model to predict failure on a real test case.

Keywords: Ductile Damage Models, FEA, Fracture Locus, Punch test, Rice and Tracey

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

3. Results

3.1 Fracture Locus Calibration
3.2 Punch Test

4. Conclusions

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Mastrone, M. N., Fraccaroli, L., & Concli, F. (2021). Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test. Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., 9(3), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-249-260
M. N. Mastrone, L. Fraccaroli, and F. Concli, "Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test," Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249-260, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-249-260
@research-article{Mastrone2021DuctileDM,
title={Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test},
author={Marco Nicola Mastrone and Lorenzo Fraccaroli and Franco Concli},
journal={International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements},
year={2021},
page={249-260},
doi={https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-249-260}
}
Marco Nicola Mastrone, et al. "Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, v 9, pp 249-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-249-260
Marco Nicola Mastrone, Lorenzo Fraccaroli and Franco Concli. "Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 9, (2021): 249-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-249-260
MASTRONE M N, FRACCAROLI L, CONCLI F. Ductile Damage Model of an Alluminum Alloy: Experimental and Numerical Validation on a Punch Test[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 2021, 9(3): 249-260. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V9-N3-249-260