Javascript is required
[1] Ceccotti, A., New technologies for construction of medium-rise buildings in seismic regions: the X-lam case. Structural Engineering International, 18(2), pp. 156–165, 2008. 5: Results of numerical simulations compared with experimental data in terms of: (a) corner uplift and (b) base slip. [Crossref]
[2] Ceccotti, A., Sandhaas, C., Okabe, M., Yasumura, M.,Minowa, C. & Kawai, N., SOFIE project - 3D shaking table test on a seven-storey full-scale cross-laminated timber building.Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(13), pp. 2003–2021, 2013. [Crossref]
[3] Hristovski, V., Dujic, B., Stojmanovska, M. & Mircenvska, V., Full-scale shaking-table tests of X-lam panel system and numerical verification: specimen 1. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(11), pp. 2010–2018, 2013. [Crossref]
[4] Popovski, M. & Gavric, I., Performance of a 2-Story CLT house subjected to lateral loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(4), E4015006-1-12, 2013. [Crossref]
[5] Yasumura, M., Kobayashi, K., Okabe, M., Miyake, T. & Matsumoto, K., Full-scale tests and numerical analysis of low-rise CLT structures under lateral loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(4), E4015007-1-12, 2016. [Crossref]
[6] Flatscher, G. & Schickhofer, G., Shaking-table test of a cross-laminated timber structure. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 168(11), pp. 878–888, 2015. [Crossref]
[7] Gavric, I., Fragiacomo, M. & Ceccotti, A., Cyclic behavior of CLT wall systems: experimental tests and analytical prediction models. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(11), 04015034-1–14, 2015. [Crossref]
[8] Tomasi, R. & Smith, I., Experimental characterization of monotonic and cyclic loading responses of CLT panel-to-foundation angle bracket connections. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(6), 040141891-10, 2015. [Crossref]
[9] Gavric, I., Fragiacomo, M. & Ceccotti, A., Cyclic behaviour of typical metal connectors for cross-laminated (CLT) structures. Materials and Structures, 48(6), pp. 1841–1857, 2015. [Crossref]
[10] Pozza, L., Massari, M., Ferracuti, B. & Savoia, M., Experimental campaign of mechanical CLT connections subjected to a combination of shear and tension forces. Structures and Architecture Beyond their Limits, Edited by Paulo J. da Sousa Cruz, CRC Press, 2016, pp. 110–118. [Crossref]
[11] Rinaldin, G., Amadio, C. & Fragiacomo, M., A component approach for the hysteretic behaviour of connections in cross-laminated wooden structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(13), pp. 2023–2042, 2013. [Crossref]
[12] Talledo, D., Pozza, L., Saetta, A. & Savoia, M., Coupled shear-tension numerical model for modelling of CLT connections. XXIII World Conference. Timber Engineering, WCTE 2016, Vienna, Austria, 2016.
[13] Pozza, L. & Scotta, R., Influence of wall assembly on behaviour of cross-laminated timber buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 168(4), pp. 275–286. [Crossref]
[14] Dujic, B., Strus, K., Zarnic, R. & Ceccotti, A., Prediction of dynamic response of a 7-storey massive X-lam wooden building tested on a shaking table. Proceedings of World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), Riva del Garda, Italy, 2010.
[15] Pei, S., van de Lindt, J.W. & Popovski, M., Approximate R-factor for cross-laminated timber walls in multistory buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 19(4),pp. 245–255, 2013. [Crossref]
[16] Polastri, A., Loss, D., Pozza, L. & Smith, I., CLT buildings braced with cores and additional shear walls. In proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), 22–25 August 2016, Wien, Austria, 2016.
[17] Polastri, A. & Pozza, L., Proposal for a standardized design and modeling procedure of tall CLT buildings. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(3), pp. 607–624, 2016. [Crossref]
[18] Pozza, L., Scotta, R., Trutalli, D., Polastri, A. & Smith, I., Experimentally based q-factor estimation of cross-laminated timber walls. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 169(7), pp. 492–507, 2016. [Crossref]
[19] Pozza, L. & Trutalli, D., An analytical formulation of q-factor for mid-rise CLT buildings – a parametric numerical analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(5), 2015–2033, 2016. [Crossref]
[20] CEN European Committee for Standardization. Design of timber structures—Part 1-1: General—Common rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 5, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
[21] Izzi, M., Polastri, A. & Fragiacomo, M. Advanced modelling of CLT wall systems for earthquake resistant timber structures. INTER 2016 Meeting, 2016. Graz, Austria, Paper 49-15-6.
[22] Pozza, L., Scotta, R., Trutalli, D. & Polastri, A., Behaviour factor for innovative massive timber shear walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(11), pp. 3449–3469, 2015. [Crossref]
[23] D.M. 14.01.2008, Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni, G.U. 4.02.2008, n.29,
[24] CEN European Committee for Standardization. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Eurocode 8, CEN, Brussels, Belgium. 2013.
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of IJCMEM from 2025 Vol. 13, No. 3. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY 4.0 license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the previous owner. ✯ : This issue/volume is not published by Acadlore.

Open Access
Research article

Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings

Luca Pozza1,
Marco Savoia1,
Luca Franco1,
Anna Saetta1,
Diego Talledo2
1
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
2
Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements
|
Volume 5, Issue 6, 2017
|
Pages 953-965
Received: N/A,
Revised: N/A,
Accepted: N/A,
Available online: N/A
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

This work reports a summary of different type of analyses and modelling approaches, typically adopted by practitioners and researchers for the prediction of the seismic response of multi-storey CLT buildings. Specifically, two different modelling approaches are deeply investigated and compared; the first one is a component approach, which adopts springs (linear or non-linear) for connections, while the second one is based on a simplified phenomenological model where the behaviour of the system is reproduced by means of diagonal springs (linear or non-linear). The advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches are presented and critically discussed with reference to the types of the performed analysis (linear or non-linear).

In order to verify the capability of the two modelling approaches to predict the seismic response of CLT structures performing linear analyses, a series of multi-storey buildings with increasing number of storeys and increasing values of design PGA are investigated. Obtained results are compared in terms of principal elastic periods, internal forces in the connection elements and drifts. Moreover, some correlations between results from the component and the phenomenological approach are given. Then, a first attempt of defining a numerical model suitable for non-linear analyses of a single CLT shear-wall, according to both the component and the phenomenological approaches is presented. Finally, the obtained results are discussed, highlighting the key issues in non-linear modelling of CLT structures.

Keywords: CLT structures, modelling approach, numerical model, seismic design, timber structures
References
[1] Ceccotti, A., New technologies for construction of medium-rise buildings in seismic regions: the X-lam case. Structural Engineering International, 18(2), pp. 156–165, 2008. 5: Results of numerical simulations compared with experimental data in terms of: (a) corner uplift and (b) base slip. [Crossref]
[2] Ceccotti, A., Sandhaas, C., Okabe, M., Yasumura, M.,Minowa, C. & Kawai, N., SOFIE project - 3D shaking table test on a seven-storey full-scale cross-laminated timber building.Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(13), pp. 2003–2021, 2013. [Crossref]
[3] Hristovski, V., Dujic, B., Stojmanovska, M. & Mircenvska, V., Full-scale shaking-table tests of X-lam panel system and numerical verification: specimen 1. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(11), pp. 2010–2018, 2013. [Crossref]
[4] Popovski, M. & Gavric, I., Performance of a 2-Story CLT house subjected to lateral loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(4), E4015006-1-12, 2013. [Crossref]
[5] Yasumura, M., Kobayashi, K., Okabe, M., Miyake, T. & Matsumoto, K., Full-scale tests and numerical analysis of low-rise CLT structures under lateral loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(4), E4015007-1-12, 2016. [Crossref]
[6] Flatscher, G. & Schickhofer, G., Shaking-table test of a cross-laminated timber structure. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 168(11), pp. 878–888, 2015. [Crossref]
[7] Gavric, I., Fragiacomo, M. & Ceccotti, A., Cyclic behavior of CLT wall systems: experimental tests and analytical prediction models. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(11), 04015034-1–14, 2015. [Crossref]
[8] Tomasi, R. & Smith, I., Experimental characterization of monotonic and cyclic loading responses of CLT panel-to-foundation angle bracket connections. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(6), 040141891-10, 2015. [Crossref]
[9] Gavric, I., Fragiacomo, M. & Ceccotti, A., Cyclic behaviour of typical metal connectors for cross-laminated (CLT) structures. Materials and Structures, 48(6), pp. 1841–1857, 2015. [Crossref]
[10] Pozza, L., Massari, M., Ferracuti, B. & Savoia, M., Experimental campaign of mechanical CLT connections subjected to a combination of shear and tension forces. Structures and Architecture Beyond their Limits, Edited by Paulo J. da Sousa Cruz, CRC Press, 2016, pp. 110–118. [Crossref]
[11] Rinaldin, G., Amadio, C. & Fragiacomo, M., A component approach for the hysteretic behaviour of connections in cross-laminated wooden structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(13), pp. 2023–2042, 2013. [Crossref]
[12] Talledo, D., Pozza, L., Saetta, A. & Savoia, M., Coupled shear-tension numerical model for modelling of CLT connections. XXIII World Conference. Timber Engineering, WCTE 2016, Vienna, Austria, 2016.
[13] Pozza, L. & Scotta, R., Influence of wall assembly on behaviour of cross-laminated timber buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 168(4), pp. 275–286. [Crossref]
[14] Dujic, B., Strus, K., Zarnic, R. & Ceccotti, A., Prediction of dynamic response of a 7-storey massive X-lam wooden building tested on a shaking table. Proceedings of World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), Riva del Garda, Italy, 2010.
[15] Pei, S., van de Lindt, J.W. & Popovski, M., Approximate R-factor for cross-laminated timber walls in multistory buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 19(4),pp. 245–255, 2013. [Crossref]
[16] Polastri, A., Loss, D., Pozza, L. & Smith, I., CLT buildings braced with cores and additional shear walls. In proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), 22–25 August 2016, Wien, Austria, 2016.
[17] Polastri, A. & Pozza, L., Proposal for a standardized design and modeling procedure of tall CLT buildings. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(3), pp. 607–624, 2016. [Crossref]
[18] Pozza, L., Scotta, R., Trutalli, D., Polastri, A. & Smith, I., Experimentally based q-factor estimation of cross-laminated timber walls. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 169(7), pp. 492–507, 2016. [Crossref]
[19] Pozza, L. & Trutalli, D., An analytical formulation of q-factor for mid-rise CLT buildings – a parametric numerical analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(5), 2015–2033, 2016. [Crossref]
[20] CEN European Committee for Standardization. Design of timber structures—Part 1-1: General—Common rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 5, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
[21] Izzi, M., Polastri, A. & Fragiacomo, M. Advanced modelling of CLT wall systems for earthquake resistant timber structures. INTER 2016 Meeting, 2016. Graz, Austria, Paper 49-15-6.
[22] Pozza, L., Scotta, R., Trutalli, D. & Polastri, A., Behaviour factor for innovative massive timber shear walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(11), pp. 3449–3469, 2015. [Crossref]
[23] D.M. 14.01.2008, Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni, G.U. 4.02.2008, n.29,
[24] CEN European Committee for Standardization. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Eurocode 8, CEN, Brussels, Belgium. 2013.
Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Pozza, L., Savoia, M., Franco, L., Saetta, A., & Talledo, D. (2017). Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings. Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., 5(6), 953-965. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N6-953-965
L. Pozza, M. Savoia, L. Franco, A. Saetta, and D. Talledo, "Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings," Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 953-965, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N6-953-965
@research-article{Pozza2017EffectOD,
title={Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings},
author={Luca Pozza and Marco Savoia and Luca Franco and Anna Saetta and Diego Talledo},
journal={International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements},
year={2017},
page={953-965},
doi={https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N6-953-965}
}
Luca Pozza, et al. "Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, v 5, pp 953-965. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N6-953-965
Luca Pozza, Marco Savoia, Luca Franco, Anna Saetta and Diego Talledo. "Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings." International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 5, (2017): 953-965. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N6-953-965
POZZA L， SAVOIA M， FRANCO L， et al. Effect of Different Modelling Approaches on the Prediction of the Seismic Response of Multi-Storey CLT Buildings[J]. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements， 2017， 5(6)： 953-965. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N6-953-965