Javascript is required
Abdeta, D., Ayana, A. N., & Bekele, Y. (2023). Willingness to pay for forest conservation: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey analysis in Southwest Ethiopia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 46, e02551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Al-Abdulqader, K. S., Ibrahim, A.-J., Ong, J., & Khalifa, A. A. (2025). Environmental consciousness and willingness to pay for carbon emissions reductions: Empirical evidence from Qatar. Energies, 18(17), 4541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Araghi, Y., Kroesen, M., Molin, E., & Van Wee, B. (2016). Revealing heterogeneity in air travelers’ responses to passenger-oriented environmental policies: A discrete-choice latent class model. Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 10(9), 765–772. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bazrbachi, A., Sidique, S. F., Shamsudin, M. N., Radam, A., Kaffashi, S., & Adam, S. U. (2017). Willingness to pay to improve air quality: A study of private vehicle owners in Klang Valley, Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod., 148, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Berger, S., Kilchenmann, A., Lenz, O., & Schlöder, F. (2022). Willingness-to-pay for carbon dioxide offsets: Field evidence on revealed preferences in the aviation industry. Glob. Environ. Change, 73, 102470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Choi, A. S., Gössling, S., & Ritchie, B. W. (2018). Flying with climate liability? Economic valuation of voluntary carbon offsets using forced choices. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 62, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Cordes, H. (2020). Voluntary carbon offsets in the aviation industry: How environmental knowledge affects travelers’ willingness to pay: A systematic review [Mastersthesis]. University of Jyväskylä, Finland. [Google Scholar]
Danish, Zhang, B., Wang, Z., & Wang, B. (2018). Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: Evidence from Pakistan. Nat. Hazards, 90(1), 27–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
de Mello, F. P. (2024). Voluntary carbon offset programs in aviation: A systematic literature review. Transp. Policy, 147, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Dray, L., Schäfer, A. W., Grobler, C., Falter, C., Allroggen, F., Stettler, M. E. J., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2022). Cost and emissions pathways towards net-zero climate impacts in aviation. Nat. Clim. Chang., 12(10), 956–962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ebissa, G., Yeshitela, K., Desta, H., & Fetene, A. (2023). Urban agriculture and environmental sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 26, 14583–14599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Fabiana Peixoto de, M. & Rosario, M. (2024). Assessing the efficacy of EU greenwashing directive: A study of European airlines’ voluntary carbon offset programs. J. Air Transp. Res. Soc., 3, 100028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Fatihah, S. N. & Rahim, A. A. (2017). The willingness to pay of air travel passengers to offset their carbon dioxide (CO2) Emissions: A Putrajaya resident case study. J. Tour. Hosp. Environ. Manag., 2(5), 18–32. [Google Scholar]
Geng, J., Yang, N., Zhang, W., & Yang, L. (2023). Public willingness to pay for green lifestyle in China: A contingent valuation method based on integrated model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20(3), 2185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Guix, M., Ollé, C., & Font, X. (2022). Trustworthy or misleading communication of voluntary carbon offsets in the aviation industry. Tour. Manag., 88, 104430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Gupta, K. (2024). Carbon credits and offsetting: Navigating legal frameworks, innovative solutions, and controversies. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., 6(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
Heitmann, R. D. (2023). Carbon offsetting in the aviation industry: Determinants of purchase intention and attitude [Mastersthesis]. University of Lisbon, Portugal. [Google Scholar]
Homan, S., Strong, C., & O’Hanlon, S. (2024). Interrogating Popular Music and the City. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
Huang, Y. (2024). The image change of China in the era of New Media: A comparative study on China’s internet image before 2019 and after 2024 [Mastersthesis]. Uppsala Universitet, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
Hui, T. H., Itani, N., & O’Connell, J. F. (2024). Examining air travellers’ willingness to pay for non-voluntary environment-related fees: The case of SAF surcharge and carbon taxes. Highlights Sustain., 3(1), 61–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
International Air Transport Association. (2023). Sustainable aviation fuel: Driving net zero aviation. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/environment/sustainable-aviation-fuels/ [Google Scholar]
Jou, R. & Chen, T. Y. (2015). Willingness to pay of air passengers for carbon-offset. Sustainability, 7(3), 3071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kanekar, A. (2024). Chimeric city: Liminal spaces of Indian night markets. In The Interior Urbanism Theory Reader (pp. 309–316). Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
Kapoor, A. (2020). Helping reduce environmental impact of aviation with machine learning. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2012.09433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kuo, C.-W. (2022). Taiwan passengers’ willingness to pay for air sleeper seats. J. Adv. Transp., 2022(1), 5294377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Laphet, J. & Tandamrong, D. (2025). Exploring airline passengers’ environmental attitudes and behaviors: Factor analysis of carbon emission reduction strategies. Int. J. Environ. Impacts, 8(4), 655–665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Le, N. T. C. (2024). Voluntary carbon offsets in sustainable aviation research: A bibliometric analysis. Transp. Res. Procedia, 80, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Lee, A. & Koo, T. (2020). Exploratory study of the impact of significant ecotourism experience on voluntary carbon-offset behaviour of young travellers in their long-haul air travel choices. In Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism (pp. 971–979). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Lei, M., Pelz, S., Pachauri, S., & Cai, W. (2024). A dataset of income distribution on provincial, urban, and rural levels for China from 2020 to 2100. Sci. Data, 11, 1436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Liao, W., Fan, Y., & Wang, C. (2022). How does COVID-19 affect the implementation of CORSIA? J. Air Transp. Manage., 99, 102180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Liu, Y., Jiang, Q., & Gleasure, R. (2021). Hitting net-zero without stopping flying: Increasing air travelers’ likelihood to opt-in to voluntary carbon offsetting. J. Travel Res., 62(1), 21–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ma, W., Zhang, Y., & Cui, J. (2021). Chinese future frequent flyers’ willingness to pay for carbon emissions reduction. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 97, 102935. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
NSTDA. (2025). BCG Model: Fostering Sustainable Development in Thai Economy. https://www.nstda.or.th/en/images/pdf/BCG_Booklet1.pdf [Google Scholar]
Park, J., Ryu, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024). Factors influencing air passengers’ intention to purchase voluntary carbon offsetting programs: The moderating role of environmental knowledge. J. Air Transp. Manag., 118, 102619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Pickering, C. & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High. Educ. Res. Dev., 33(3), 534–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Pimiä, A., Urponen, A., & Kolehmainen, A. (2024). Green horizons ahead: Navigating carbon neutrality in European transportation by sky and sea. Econ. Cult., 21(1), 149–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Prussi, M., Lee, U., Wang, M., Malina, R., Valin, H., Taheripour, F., Velarde, C., Staples, M. D., Lonza, L., & Hileman, J. I. (2021). CORSIA: The first internationally adopted approach to calculate life-cycle GHG emissions for aviation fuels. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ranasinghe, J. P. R. C., Ranatunga, R. A. D. D. N., & Pattiyagedara, P. G. S. S. (2021). Operating carbon-neutral tourism: Systematic review & bibliometric analysis. J. Sustain. Tour. Entrep., 3(2), 139–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Rosales, R. C., Bellino, P., Elnahass, M., Heubaum, H., Lim, P., Lemaistre, P., Siman, K., & Sjögersten, S. (2021). Voluntary Carbon Markets in ASEAN: Challenges and Opportunities for Scaling Up. UK Government/ The British High Commission Singapore. [Google Scholar]
Rotaris, L., Giansoldati, M., & Scorrano, M. (2020). Are air travellers willing to pay for reducing or offsetting carbon emissions? Evidence from Italy. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 142, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
SCB Thailand. (2025). Foreign exchange rates. https://www.scb.co.th/th/personal-banking/foreign-exchange-rates.html [Google Scholar]
Schleich, J. & Alsheimer, S. (2024). The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5°C target? Ecol. Econ., 219, 108151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Seetaram, N., Song, H., Ye, S., & Page, S. (2018). Estimating willingness to pay air passenger duty. Ann. Tour. Res., 72, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Shaari, N. F., Fadzil, A. S. A., Aziz, N. A., Zainoddin, A. I., Jalal, M. Z. H. A., Harun, Q. N., Hassim, N. H., Mohamad, A., & Sulaiman, C. (2022). Stepping up and stepping out of COVID-19: Malaysian airline passengers’ travel behaviour and does it impact willingness to pay for carbon offset. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 1102(1), 012041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Shrivastava, N., Sharma, V., & Chaklader, B. (2019). A study to assess impact of carbon credit trading into costs and prices of different goods and services—A study from the airline industry. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues, 18(2), 126–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Sonnenschein, J. & Smedby, N. (2019). Designing air ticket taxes for climate change mitigation: Insights from a Swedish valuation study. Clim. Policy, 19(5), 651–663. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tang, B. J., Yan, R., Chen, J.-Y., & Ji, C.-J. (2024). Are air travelers willing to pay for mandatory carbon emission policies? Evidence from China. Sustain. Prod. Consum., 52, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tao, Y., Duan, M., & Deng, Z. (2021). Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to explain willingness towards voluntary carbon offsetting among Chinese consumers. Ecol. Econ., 185, 107068. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
TAT. (2022). TAT working to further develop carbon neutral tourism in Thailand. https://www.tatnews.org/2022/07/tat-working-to-further-develop-carbon-neutral-tourism-in-thailand/ [Google Scholar]
TGO. (2025). Voluntary carbon credit prices in Thailand. https://carbonmarket.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=Y2N0X3ByaWNl [Google Scholar]
UNWTO. (2025). Transforming tourism for climate action. https://www.unwto.org/sustainable-development/climate-action?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar]
Wang, L., Wang, J., Shen, P., Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2023). Low-carbon travel behavior in daily residence and tourism destination: Based on TPB-ABC integrated model. Sustainability, 15(19), 14349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wendt, N., Kipperberg, G., & Lindhjem, H. (2024). Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 134, 104347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Xue, C. H. & Bai, Y. P. (2023). Spatiotemporal characteristics and factors influencing urban tourism market network in Western China: Taking Chengdu as an example. Sustainability, 15(10), 8135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Yang, W. & Bi, C. (2024). Marketing the community-based eco-tourism for Thai and Chinese under the new media era for local authorities. J. Ecohumanism, 3(7), 4481–4496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Yirgu, K. W. & Kim, A. M. (2023). Estimating the effects of price-based environmental policies on aviation emissions at neighboring airports. J. Clean. Prod., 425, 138928. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zhang, B., Ritchie, B. W., Mair, J., & Driml, S. (2021). Air passengers’ preferences for aviation voluntary carbon offsetting: A co-benefits perspective. J. Travel Res., 61(6), 1437–1457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zhao, P. & Yuan, D. (2023). China’s transport system. In Population Growth and Sustainable Transport in China (pp. 31–58). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zhao, X. & Sun, D. (2024). Urban amenity preferences in internal labor migration networks: Evidence from 285 cities in China. SSRN Papers. [Google Scholar]
Zhao, Y. & Yu, H. (2018). A door-to-door travel time approach for evaluating modal competition of intercity travel: A focus on the proposed Dallas-Houston HSR route. J. Transp. Geogr., 72, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zheng, S., Ge, Y. E., Fu, X., & Jiang, C. (2019). Voluntary carbon offset and airline alliance. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol., 123, 110–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Search
Open Access
Research article

Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China

Duangrat Tandamrong1,
Jakkawat Laphet2*,
Tapsatit Gooncokkord3*
1
Mahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University, 44150 Mahasarakham, Thailand
2
College of Aviation, Tourism and Hospitality, Sripatum University, 40000 Khon Kaen, Thailand
3
Faculty of Logistics, Burapha University, 20131 Chonburi, Thailand
Challenges in Sustainability
|
Volume 13, Issue 4, 2025
|
Pages 535-545
Received: 08-05-2025,
Revised: 09-18-2025,
Accepted: 10-15-2025,
Available online: 11-08-2025
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

This study investigated sustainable tourism practices in the aviation sector by assessing how passenger awareness and carbon offset pricing could be integrated into travel behaviors. With the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Carbon Emissions Calculator, the analysis covered five Thai Airways routes from Thailand to Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing, Kunming, and Chengdu. The calculated offset costs per passenger ranged between 6.55 and 36.99 CNY, which were derived by applying a benchmark of 95 CNY/tCO2e (≈ 445 THB) to per-passenger emissions. These proposed offset contributions were not obtained from evidence of direct survey on the offset cost per passenger. On the other hand, the benchmark selected was based on the estimate in the international literature, anticipated price trends, and the goal of encouraging broader participation. The findings prioritized the importance of consistent terminology, explicit standards, and collaborative policies between public and private stakeholders to strengthen travelers’ engagement in carbon offset programs.
Keywords: Carbon credit offsets, Full-service airlines, Offset costs, Compensation, Per-passenger

1. Introduction

China has emerged as one of the top tourist spots (L​e​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​4) in the world as tourism has gained popularity. Ever since the visa-free policy for China has been in force from March 1, 2024, there has been a significant rise in the influx of tourists, especially to big cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Harbin, and Chengdu. The growth of eco-tourism in China, particularly in cities like Beijing and Shanghai, has stirred a great deal of interest among Thai travelers, thus emphasizing sustainable travel development and cross-cultural interaction (Y​a​n​g​ ​&​ ​B​i​,​ ​2​0​2​4). Observations of public space consumption in urban China, especially cities like Guangzhou and Nanjing, indicated that Thai visitors were inclined to visit open public space or places of cultural diversity (M​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​1). Culturally oriented sites like Shanghai and Chengdu have been specially designed for international tourists, including Thai tourists, by focusing on maintaining historical and cultural heritages (K​a​n​e​k​a​r​,​ ​2​0​2​4). The cultural music, events, and festivals in Harbin and Xi’an continue to be fascinating attractions for Thai tourists seeking to immerse in deep cultural and heritage experiences (H​o​m​a​n​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​4), thus reflecting how cultural perceptions influence travel choices. As a large number of tourists opt for air transport, this in turn generates serious concerns about greenhouse gas emissions, which are a major cause of climate change. Extreme climate change would result in natural disasters in most countries and societies (L​i​a​o​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2). Consisting mainly of CO₂, aviation emissions account for approximately 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions, a substantial and increasing share that underscores the urgency of climate mitigation (L​a​p​h​e​t​ ​&​ ​T​a​n​d​a​m​r​o​n​g​,​ ​2​0​2​5; K​a​p​o​o​r​,​ ​2​0​2​0). Recognizing this, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a United Nations specialized agency, launched the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) in January 2021. The program mandates that airlines operating internationally report CO₂ emissions every year and offset the surplus, with a long-term goal of achieving net-zero emissions (E​b​i​s​s​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​3). While the CORSIA emphasizes the requirement for offsetting, it does not reduce the burden on the aviation industry to reduce emissions through technology. The mitigating strategies, which include considering Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), enhancing fuel efficiency, and developing innovative technologies, echo the environmental sustainability commitment and social responsibility of airlines (I​n​t​e​r​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​ ​A​i​r​ ​T​r​a​n​s​p​o​r​t​ ​A​s​s​o​c​i​a​t​i​o​n​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

With the growing importance of sustainable tourism, this research aimed to evaluate passengers’ attitudes toward carbon credit offsetting by tourists traveling from Thailand to China. The views of full-service airlines will be vital for understanding how awareness and willingness to invest in carbon credits could be effectively integrated into travel habits, thus contributing to a more sustainable aviation industry (A​l​-​A​b​d​u​l​q​a​d​e​r​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​5). The study also emphasized the need for effective communication to enrich passengers’ knowledge of the impact of aviation on health, lifestyle, and the environment. Airlines typically provide such information to strengthen passengers’ understanding of the importance of carbon credits. Existing literature suggested that environmental awareness significantly influenced passengers’ offset cost per passenger for carbon offsets (P​a​r​k​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​4). Active participation of passengers could be encouraged by arousing their awareness of the values of carbon offset programs, supporting reforestation or establishing renewable energy. Promoting eco-friendly initiatives is a question of presenting quality information and targeted marketing; training airline staff in environmental communication can prove particularly effective. Simple and accessible information on the advantages and proper use of carbon credits will enable travelers to make knowledgeable decisions.

To recapitulate, environmental awareness among passengers is crucial as it directly affects their offset cost per passenger for carbon credits. Publicity and educational campaigns advocating for environmentally conscious travel behavior will heighten their awareness of the environmental impact of aviation. This will complement the overall shift to curb pollution and greenhouse gases in the aviation sector to a great extent. Developing policies and programmers that prioritize environmental education, open communication, and culturally sensitive messaging will be key to improving the uptake of carbon credit schemes among tourists, especially in multicultural and international itineraries like Thailand-China toward global, culturally inclusive, and carbon-neutral tourism.

2. Background of Research

The Methodology section should be written concisely, yet provide enough details to allow others to replicate and build on published results. The well-established methods can be introduced briefly with proper citations. Do not describe these published methods in details. In contrast, detailed descriptions are required for new methods. If multiple methods are adopted in the work, this section may be divided into several subsections, each providing details on a specific method. Note that the publication of your manuscript means all materials, data, codes, and protocols associated with the publication must be made available to readers. Remember to disclose restrictions on the availability of materials or information at the submission stage. If your manuscript uses large datasets deposited in an opensource database, please specify where the data have been deposited. If your study requires ethical approval, do not forget to list the authority and code of the ethical approval.

2.1 Carbon Offsets and Market Mechanisms

Carbon offsets represent the amount of greenhouse gases reduced or sequestered through mitigation projects relative to a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. Measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e), carbon offsets must be certified under recognized standards before being traded between entities seeking to offset emissions and those that have achieved reductions. Projects generating carbon offsets typically fall into two categories: (1) emission reduction or avoidance, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, and waste management; and (2) greenhouse gas removal or nature-based sequestration, including carbon capture and storage technologies and reforestation initiatives.

In Thailand, the Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (T​G​O​,​ ​2​0​2​5) facilitates a carbon credit market that allows offsets to be traded, and provides a mechanism for accounting and pricing the social costs of emissions (R​o​s​a​l​e​s​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​1). Full-service airlines, such as Thai Airways, are key participants in this market. By integrating carbon offsets into ticket pricing or offering them as optional add-ons, airlines could address rising consumer demand for environmentally responsible travel. Evidence from survey indicates that carbon offset compensation extends across multiple sectors, including agriculture, forestry, energy, transport, tourism, banking, finance, aviation, and Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Exhibitions (MICE) (Figure 1). Airlines often utilize carbon offset tools, such as the ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator, to efficiently estimate passenger emissions and determine appropriate offset contributions.

2.2 Carbon Neutral Tourism

Tourism significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, both directly through transportation and indirectly via related activities. With increasing passenger travel, longer journeys, and escalating energy consumption, the transport sector accounts for a growing share of tourism-related emissions (W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

Carbon Neutral Tourism refers to practices designed to balance emitted CO₂ with equivalent offsets, in order to achieve a net-zero carbon footprint (R​a​n​a​s​i​n​g​h​e​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​1). This approach combines strategies to reduce emissions from tourism operations with measures to compensate for residual emissions. For example, the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) emphasized the importance of accelerating climate action in tourism to enhance sector resilience and mitigate its contribution to global warming (U​N​W​T​O​,​ ​2​0​2​5).

In Thailand, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) has adopted the principle to “adjust, reduce, and compensate” for guiding tourism businesses toward carbon-neutral operations. Under this framework, conventional tourism activities are redesigned to minimize carbon intensity, whereas carbon offsets are adopted to neutralize unavoidable emissions. These initiatives, supporting the sustainability and accountability of the national tourism sector, align with the Bio-Circular-Green (BCG) Economy Model in Thailand (T​A​T​,​ ​2​0​2​2; N​S​T​D​A​,​ ​2​0​2​5).

Figure 1. Carbon credit compensation

3. Methodology

The Scopus database was searched, in January 2025, using combinations of the following search terms: "carbon" AND "offset" AND "aviation". A total of 120 articles were identified through the screening process; among them, 30 articles were specifically related to carbon credit offsets for airline passengers. It was discovered from further classification that 16 articles were related to the monetary amounts of carbon credit offsets, 3 articles studied the percentage of carbon credit offsets, and 11 articles examined carbon credit offsets without directly surveying passengers, as presented in Figure 2. The number of papers included aligns with the criteria established by P​i​c​k​e​r​i​n​g​ ​&​ ​B​y​r​n​e​ ​(​2​0​1​4​), which stipulates a range of 15 to 300 papers for a systematic review.

As illustrated in Figure 2, eleven articles (B​a​z​r​b​a​c​h​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​7; D​r​a​y​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2; G​u​i​x​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2; L​e​,​ ​2​0​2​4; L​e​e​ ​&​ ​K​o​o​,​ ​2​0​2​0; L​i​a​o​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2; L​i​u​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​1; P​i​m​i​ä​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​4; W​e​n​d​t​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​4; Y​i​r​g​u​ ​&​ ​K​i​m​,​ ​2​0​2​3; Z​h​e​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​9.) have examined airline carbon offsets, but none include passenger surveys regarding the amount contributed to carbon credits to offset their purchases. The relevant section of the research is presented in Table 1. The study on carbon credit compensation across various industries revealed that Thailand lacked a comprehensive carbon credit compensation scheme currently, particularly within the aviation sector. The researcher evaluated the carbon dioxide emissions released into the atmosphere by commercial aircraft operating at their maximum capacity for each model commonly in use today, with a particular study on popular routes frequently traveled by tourists to China. The study focused on aircraft such as Airbus A320 and A350, as well as Boeing B737 and B777, among others. The popular routes analyzed involve Bangkok (BKK) to Shanghai (PVG), Bangkok (BKK) to Guangzhou (CAN), Bangkok (BKK) to Beijing (PEK), Bangkok (BKK) to Kunming (KMG), and Bangkok (BKK) to Chengdu (TFU), considering seats for both Business and Economy Classes. Moreover, the study aimed to determine an appropriate amount of carbon offsets that airlines could adopt as a policy and potentially enhance as an additional charge for Thai passengers in the future.

3.1 Data Acquisition

The average Thai voluntary carbon credit price was 305 THB/tCO2e in year 2024. However, this study adopted a higher benchmark of 445 THB/tCO2e (≈ 95 CNY). The benchmark was selected based on three reasons: (i) it aligns with international willingness to pay (WTP) as summarized in Table 1, which typically reports higher benchmarks than the Thai domestic average; (ii) it anticipates upward trends in global carbon credit prices; and (iii) it provides a normative basis for encouraging stronger participation in voluntary offsetting schemes. To test the robustness, a sensitivity analysis was recommended using both the Thai market average of 305 THB and the benchmark of 445 THB. This would enhance methodological transparency and ensure practical feasibility, given the purchasing power of Thai travelers.

Figure 2. Results of selecting unrelated research

An average benchmark price of 95 CNY/tCO2e was used to calculate the proposed per-passenger carbon offset contributions for Thai travelers. The emissions factor applied is 0.3284 kgCO2e per kg of fuel, based on the Thai National Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Database, TIIS-MTEC-NSTDA. To estimate per-passenger contributions, the study analyzed five popular routes from Bangkok to China: Shanghai (PVG), Guangzhou (CAN), Beijing (PEK), Kunming (KMG), and Chengdu (TFU). Aircraft models commonly used on these routes, including Airbus A320 and A350, as well as Boeing B737 and B777 series were considered. Seats for both Economy and Business Classes were included in the calculations.

The per-passenger carbon offset (Cos) was calculated as follows:

$\operatorname{Cos}=\frac{\mathrm{Rfb} \times 0.3284}{\mathrm{~N}} \times \mathrm{PVOs}$
(1)

where,

Cos=(Rfb × 0.3284)/N×PVOs

Cos = Carbon offset (tCO2e)

Rfb = Aircraft Fuel Burnt by ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator (ICEC) according to the desired route (one-way or round-trip) (kgCO2e)

kgCO2e = Emissions Factor Comparison (1 kg of fuel equals to 0.3284 kgCO2e)

PVOs = the amount of money that passengers voluntarily offset (95 CNY)

N = Number of seats on the aircraft

This approach allows estimation of a standardized per-passenger contribution that airlines could implement as a voluntary carbon offset policy. It is essential to note that these contributions are calculated estimates rather than empirically measured offset cost per passenger by passengers.

Table 1. Research conducted in relation to carbon offsets and passenger credits over the past 10 years

Author

Sample

Route

Average WTP

Original

THB

H​u​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​4​)

Passenger

Long-haul route

86%

N/A

T​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​4​)

Passenger

International route

311.04 CNY

1,500

S​c​h​l​e​i​c​h​ ​&​ ​A​l​s​h​e​i​m​e​r​ ​(​2​0​2​4​)

Passenger

Domestic route

0 EUR

0

G​e​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​3​)

General Public

Domestic route

International route

86 CNY

405

B​e​r​g​e​r​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​2​)

Passenger

Domestic route

International route

1 EUR

35.64

K​u​o​ ​(​2​0​2​2​)

Passenger

International route

194 NTD

201.58

M​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​1​)

Passenger

International route

58.53 CNY

282.28

T​a​o​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​1​)

Passenger

International route

419 CNY

2,020.62

S​h​a​a​r​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​2​)

Passenger

Domestic route

International route

86 MYR

661.24

Z​h​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​1​)

Passenger

Domestic route

International route

10%

N/A

R​o​t​a​r​i​s​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​0​)

Passenger

Short-haul route

Medium-haul route

Long-haul route

30 EUR

230.67

S​o​n​n​e​n​s​c​h​e​i​n​ ​&​ ​S​m​e​d​b​y​ ​(​2​0​1​9​)

Passenger

Short-haul route

Medium-haul route

Long-haul route

29 EUR

1,033.5

S​h​r​i​v​a​s​t​a​v​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​9​)

Passenger

International route

121 INR

83.19

Z​h​a​o​ ​&​ ​Y​u​ ​(​2​0​1​8​)

General Public

Domestic route

10%

N/A

S​e​e​t​a​r​a​m​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​8​)

Passenger

Short-haul route

Long-haul route

30 EUR

1,069.14

C​h​o​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​8​)

Passenger

Short-haul route

Long-haul route

12.27 AU

263.03

F​a​t​i​h​a​h​ ​&​ ​R​a​h​i​m​ ​(​2​0​1​7​)

Passenger

Domestic route

International route

6.1 RM

46.9

A​r​a​g​h​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​6​)

Passenger

Short-haul route

18 EUR

641.48

J​o​u​ ​&​ ​C​h​e​n​ ​(​2​0​1​5​)

Passenger

Domestic route

20 TWD

21

Average WTP

95 CNY

445 THB

Note: Currency (10 January 2025) by S​C​B​ ​T​h​a​i​l​a​n​d​ ​(​2​0​2​5​).

1. Bangkok (BKK) to Shanghai (PVG) route covers a round-trip distance of 5,822 km and utilizes the Airbus A350-900 operated by Thai Airways. This analysis employed the ICEC software to evaluate the carbon emissions associated with various aircraft models servicing the route. The aircraft models considered include Airbus A320, A321, A32A, A32N, A32Q, A332, A333, A359, Boeing B73E, B73L, and B73M, as outlined in Table 2.

Table 2 illustrates the amount of carbon credit compensation that passengers are willing to pay for the Bangkok (BKK) to Shanghai (PVG) route, which covers a round-trip distance of 5,822 km. The researcher highlighted the travel patterns of passengers using Thai Airways, specifically aboard the Airbus A350-900 aircraft. The suggested compensation amounts were divided into two service classes: Economy Class passengers were expected to contribute 13.28 CNY, whereas Business Class passengers should compensate with 28.49 CNY.

Table 2. BKK-PVG/round-trip based on the ICEC

Class

No. of Seats

Aircraft Fuel Burnt

Carbon Offsets

Economy Class

289

123,097 kg

13.28 CNY

Business Class

32

29,223 kg

28.49 CNY

2. Bangkok (BKK) to Guangzhou (CAN) route covers a round-trip distance of 3,430 km and utilizes the Boeing B787-900 operated by Thai Airways. The calculations were based on the formula indicating that 1 kg of aircraft fuel burnt is equivalent to 0.3284 kg of CO2e. This analysis employed the ICEC software to evaluate the carbon emissions associated with various aircraft models servicing the route. The aircraft models considered include Airbus A320, A32Q, A359, Boeing B738, B73E, B772, B788, and B7M8, as outlined in Table 3.

Table 3 sets out the amounts of carbon credit compensation that passengers are willing to pay for the Bangkok (BKK) to Guangzhou (CAN) route, which covers a round-trip distance of 5,822 km. The researcher highlighted the travel patterns of passengers using Thai Airways, specifically aboard the Boeing B787-900 aircraft. The proposed compensation amounts were divided into two service classes: Economy Class passengers were expected to contribute 7.63 CNY, while Business Class passengers should compensate with 18.16 CNY.

Table 3. BKK-CAN/round-trip based on the ICEC

Class

No. of Seats

Aircraft Fuel Burnt

Carbon Offsets

Economy Class

268

65,578 KG

7.63 CNY

Business Class

30

17,472 KG

18.16 CNY

3. Bangkok (BKK) to Beijing (PEK) route covers a round-trip distance of 5,822 km and utilizes the Airbus A350-900 operated by Thai Airways. The calculations were based on the formula indicating that 1 kg of aircraft fuel burnt is equivalent to 0.3284 kg of CO2e. This analysis employed the ICEC software to evaluate the carbon emissions associated with various aircraft models servicing the route. The aircraft models considered include Airbus A320, A32Q, A359, Boeing B738, B73E, B772, B788, and B7M8, as outlined in Table 4.

Table 4 illustrates the amounts of carbon credit compensation that passengers are willing to pay for the Bangkok (BKK) to Beijing (PEK) route, which covers a round-trip distance of 5,822 km. The researcher highlighted the travel patterns of passengers using Thai Airways, specifically aboard the Airbus A350-900 aircraft. The proposed compensation amounts were divided into two service classes: Economy Class passengers were expected to contribute 13.66 CNY, while Business Class passengers were required to compensate with 36.99 CNY.

Table 4. BKK-PEK/round-trip based on the ICEC

Class

No. of Seats

Aircraft Fuel Burnt

Carbon Offsets

Economy Class

289

127,948 KG

13.66 CNY

Business Class

32

37,946 KG

36.99 CNY

4. Bangkok (BKK) to Kunming (KMG) route covers a round-trip distance of 2,594 km and utilizes the Airbus A330-300 operated by Thai Airways. The calculations were based on the formula indicating that 1 kg of aircraft fuel burnt is equivalent to 0.3284 kg of CO2e. This analysis utilized the ICEC software to evaluate the carbon emissions associated with the aircraft servicing this route. The aircraft models considered for this route include Airbus A330, A359, Boeing B737, B738, and B73E, as outlined in Table 5.

Table 5 presents the amounts of carbon credit compensation that passengers are willing to pay for the Bangkok (BKK) to Kunming (KMG) route, which covers a round-trip distance of 2,594 km. The researcher emphasized the travel preferences of passengers utilizing Thai Airways, specifically on the Airbus A350-900 aircraft. The recommended compensation amounts were categorized into two service classes: Economy Class passengers were expected to contribute 6.55 CNY, while those traveling in Business Class should compensate with 14.44 CNY.

Table 5. BKK-KMG/round-trip based on the ICEC

Class

No. of Seats

Aircraft Fuel Burnt

Carbon Offsets

Economy Class

263

55,268 KG

6.55 CNY

Business Class

31

14,354 KG

14.44 CNY

5. Bangkok (BKK) to Chengdu (TFU) route, which encompasses a round-trip distance of 3,832 km and utilizes the Boeing B787-800 operated by Thai Airways. The calculations were based on the formula indicating that 1 kg of aircraft fuel burnt is equivalent to 0.3284 kg of CO2e. This assessment employed the ICEC software to analyze the carbon emissions associated with various aircraft models servicing the route. The aircraft models considered include Airbus A320, A321, A32B, A333, A359, Boeing B736, B737, B788, and B789, as outlined in Table 6.

Table 6 illustrates the amounts of carbon credit compensation that passengers are willing to pay for the Bangkok (BKK) to Chengdu (TFU) route, which covers a round-trip distance of 3,832 km. The researcher focused on the travel patterns of passengers utilizing Thai Airways, specifically aboard the Boeing B787-800 aircraft. The financial compensation amounts were delineated for two service classes: Economy Class passengers were expected to contribute 9.84 CNY, while those traveling in Business Class should compensate with 20.1 CNY.

Table 6. BKK-TFU/round-trip based on the ICEC

Class

No. of Seats

Aircraft Fuel Burnt

Carbon Offsets

Economy Class

234

73,822 KG

9.84 CNY

Business Class

22

14,178 KG

20.1 CNY

4. Results and Discussion

The carbon offset calculations provide estimated offset costs per passenger, as derived from the ICEC and benchmarked at 95 CNY/tCO2e (≈ 445 THB). The analysis involved five popular Thai airways routes commuting from Bangkok (BKK) to Shanghai (PVG), Guangzhou (CAN), Beijing (PEK), Kunming (KMG), and Chengdu (TFU) in China, with results differentiated by Economy and Business Class seating. For example, the Bangkok–Shanghai route (5,822 km, Airbus A350-900) yielded offset costs of 13.28 CNY for Economy Class and 28.49 CNY for Business Class, while the Bangkok–Beijing route showed higher costs of 13.66 CNY and 36.99 CNY for Economy and Business Classes, respectively. Shorter routes, such as Bangkok–Kunming (2,594 km), resulted in lower contributions of 6.55 CNY (Economy) and 14.44 CNY (Business). A complete summary demonstrating how offset costs vary by distance and aircraft type is provided in Table 7. These values do not reflect direct evidence from passenger survey regarding willingness to pay but rather represent proposed offset contributions, consistent with benchmarks reported in international studies.

Table 7. Evaluating Carbon Offsets for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China

Class

Route

Carbon Offsets/CNY

Carbon Offsets/THB

Economy Class

PVG

13.28 CNY

64.04 THB

Business Class

PVG

28.49 CNY

137.39 THB

Economy Class

CAN

7.63 CNY

36.79 THB

Business Class

CAN

18.16 CNY

87.57 THB

Economy Class

PEK

13.66 CNY

65.87 THB

Business Class

PEK

36.99 CNY

178.38 THB

Economy Class

KMG

6.55 CNY

31.58 THB

Business Class

KMG

14.44 CNY

69.63 THB

Economy Class

TFU

9.84 CNY

47.45 THB

Business Class

TFU

20.10 CNY

96.93 THB

Note: CNY = 4.8225 (as at 10 January 2025) by Siam Commercial Bank in Thailand.

The objective of this study is to synthesize evidence regarding carbon credit offsetting among tourists flying between Thailand and China, with a particular focus on the role of full-service airlines. The operating aircraft involved in the current calculation were Airbus A330-300, Airbus A350-900, and Boeing B787-900 across five major routes: Bangkok–Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing, Kunming, and Chengdu. Existing studies offered robust benchmarks; for instance, H​u​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​4​) found that 86% of long-haul passengers in Hong Kong were willing to purchase carbon offsets. S​c​h​l​e​i​c​h​ ​&​ ​A​l​s​h​e​i​m​e​r​ ​(​2​0​2​4​) in Germany examined domestic routes, while G​e​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​3​) identified an average WTP of 86 CNY among Chinese passengers across domestic and international routes. Furthermore, broader European surveys confirmed consistent passenger support for offsetting (A​b​d​e​t​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​3; A​r​a​g​h​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​6; B​e​r​g​e​r​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2; C​h​o​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​8; R​o​t​a​r​i​s​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​0; S​e​e​t​a​r​a​m​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​8; S​o​n​n​e​n​s​c​h​e​i​n​ ​&​ ​S​m​e​d​b​y​,​ ​2​0​1​9). Although there is currently no definitive evidence for Thai passengers, related studies in Asia, particularly Malaysia, Taiwan, and China, highlighted passengers’ willingness to contribute for offsetting programs on both short-haul and long-haul flights (D​a​n​i​s​h​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​8). Building on the literature, the present study proposed a benchmark price of approximately 25 EUR/tCO2eq, with the intention of channeling funds to the offsets in the forestry sector.

Instead of providing descriptive accounts of tourist destinations, this analysis underscored two insightful comments. First, demand for Chinese tourism is anticipated to remain strong in 2024 and beyond, hence reinforcing the importance of embedding offset schemes into high-traffic routes (H​u​a​n​g​,​ ​2​0​2​4; X​u​e​ ​&​ ​B​a​i​,​ ​2​0​2​3; Z​h​a​o​ ​&​ ​Y​u​a​n​,​ ​2​0​2​3; Z​h​a​o​ ​&​ ​S​u​n​,​ ​2​0​2​4). Second, international policy frameworks such as the CORSIA progressively incorporate the impacts of climate change into the establishment of aviation regulations, further strengthening standardized offset pricing and its associated mechanisms (P​r​u​s​s​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​1).

5. Policy Recommendations for Both the Public and Private Sectors

To effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions from air travel, clear carbon offset standards should be established to ensure transparency and effectiveness in compensating for emissions from commercial flights (G​u​p​t​a​,​ ​2​0​2​4). The government should play a crucial role in supporting local carbon credit projects by investing in initiatives such as reforestation, land rehabilitation, and renewable energy development. These projects not only help generate carbon credits but also create economic opportunities for local communities while mitigating environmental impacts (C​o​r​d​e​s​,​ ​2​0​2​0). In addition, tourism authorities should take an active role in designing carbon offset programs for tourists, such as integrating carbon credit purchases into flight tickets or offering incentives for travelers who voluntarily participate in offset programs (d​e​ ​M​e​l​l​o​,​ ​2​0​2​4).

Raising public awareness and public engagement are indispensable to achieving the success of carbon offsetting, a critical step in promoting sustainable travel. Governments and organizations should educate the public by conducting campaigns via various media platforms to emphasize the environmental impacts of air travel and the advantages of offsetting emissions (F​a​b​i​a​n​a​ ​P​e​i​x​o​t​o​ ​d​e​ ​&​ ​R​o​s​a​r​i​o​,​ ​2​0​2​4). Furthermore, investing in research and development of novel technologies such as energy-efficient aircraft and alternative fuels would contribute to long-term emission reductions in the aviation sector. Lastly, fostering collaboration among the government, private sector, and local communities could be conducive to the successful implementation of carbon offset projects, leading to both environmental and economic benefits for society (H​e​i​t​m​a​n​n​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

6. Conclusions

This paper conducted a study on the carbon credit offsetting for air travel between Thailand and China. The significant contributions and findings can be summarized into three main areas. First, it delivers empirical evidence by quantifying offset costs per passenger across five major routes from Bangkok to Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing, Kunming, and Chengdu using the ICEC. These quantitative findings established benchmark values to guide the design of offset program in the absence of Thai-specific willingness to pay surveys.

Second, it demonstrates the methodological value of integrating the ICAO-based emission calculations with evidence garnered from the international research. This approach guaranteed that the recommended benchmark price of approximately 95 CNY/tCO2e (≈ 445 THB) was both theoretically informed and practically relevant, while acknowledging that it exceeded the current average of 305 THB/tCO2e in Thai market.

Third, it highlights policy relevance for airlines and government stakeholders with the following recommendations: (i) establishing transparent offset pricing; (ii) integrating offset purchases into airline ticketing systems; and (iii) supporting domestic carbon credit projects in line with the CORSIA and Bio-Circular-Green (BCG) Economy Model in Thailand. By sharpening the conclusion around these three contributions, the study avoided redundancy and communicated its significance more effectively to an international readership.

Author Contributions

Design research, D.T., J.L., and T.G.; methodology, D.T., J.L., and T.G.; software, J.L.; validation, D.T. and J.L.; formal analysis, D.T. and J.L.; investigation, D.T.; data curation, J.L.; writing - original draft preparation, D.T. and J.L.; writing - review and editing, D.T. and T.G.; Project administration, D.T. and T.G.; Summarize results, J.L. and T.G.; Provide recommendations, J.L. and T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability

The data used to support the research findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

This research project was financially supported by Mahasarakham University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
Abdeta, D., Ayana, A. N., & Bekele, Y. (2023). Willingness to pay for forest conservation: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey analysis in Southwest Ethiopia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 46, e02551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Al-Abdulqader, K. S., Ibrahim, A.-J., Ong, J., & Khalifa, A. A. (2025). Environmental consciousness and willingness to pay for carbon emissions reductions: Empirical evidence from Qatar. Energies, 18(17), 4541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Araghi, Y., Kroesen, M., Molin, E., & Van Wee, B. (2016). Revealing heterogeneity in air travelers’ responses to passenger-oriented environmental policies: A discrete-choice latent class model. Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 10(9), 765–772. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bazrbachi, A., Sidique, S. F., Shamsudin, M. N., Radam, A., Kaffashi, S., & Adam, S. U. (2017). Willingness to pay to improve air quality: A study of private vehicle owners in Klang Valley, Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod., 148, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Berger, S., Kilchenmann, A., Lenz, O., & Schlöder, F. (2022). Willingness-to-pay for carbon dioxide offsets: Field evidence on revealed preferences in the aviation industry. Glob. Environ. Change, 73, 102470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Choi, A. S., Gössling, S., & Ritchie, B. W. (2018). Flying with climate liability? Economic valuation of voluntary carbon offsets using forced choices. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 62, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Cordes, H. (2020). Voluntary carbon offsets in the aviation industry: How environmental knowledge affects travelers’ willingness to pay: A systematic review [Mastersthesis]. University of Jyväskylä, Finland. [Google Scholar]
Danish, Zhang, B., Wang, Z., & Wang, B. (2018). Energy production, economic growth and CO2 emission: Evidence from Pakistan. Nat. Hazards, 90(1), 27–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
de Mello, F. P. (2024). Voluntary carbon offset programs in aviation: A systematic literature review. Transp. Policy, 147, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Dray, L., Schäfer, A. W., Grobler, C., Falter, C., Allroggen, F., Stettler, M. E. J., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2022). Cost and emissions pathways towards net-zero climate impacts in aviation. Nat. Clim. Chang., 12(10), 956–962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ebissa, G., Yeshitela, K., Desta, H., & Fetene, A. (2023). Urban agriculture and environmental sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 26, 14583–14599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Fabiana Peixoto de, M. & Rosario, M. (2024). Assessing the efficacy of EU greenwashing directive: A study of European airlines’ voluntary carbon offset programs. J. Air Transp. Res. Soc., 3, 100028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Fatihah, S. N. & Rahim, A. A. (2017). The willingness to pay of air travel passengers to offset their carbon dioxide (CO2) Emissions: A Putrajaya resident case study. J. Tour. Hosp. Environ. Manag., 2(5), 18–32. [Google Scholar]
Geng, J., Yang, N., Zhang, W., & Yang, L. (2023). Public willingness to pay for green lifestyle in China: A contingent valuation method based on integrated model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20(3), 2185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Guix, M., Ollé, C., & Font, X. (2022). Trustworthy or misleading communication of voluntary carbon offsets in the aviation industry. Tour. Manag., 88, 104430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Gupta, K. (2024). Carbon credits and offsetting: Navigating legal frameworks, innovative solutions, and controversies. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., 6(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
Heitmann, R. D. (2023). Carbon offsetting in the aviation industry: Determinants of purchase intention and attitude [Mastersthesis]. University of Lisbon, Portugal. [Google Scholar]
Homan, S., Strong, C., & O’Hanlon, S. (2024). Interrogating Popular Music and the City. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
Huang, Y. (2024). The image change of China in the era of New Media: A comparative study on China’s internet image before 2019 and after 2024 [Mastersthesis]. Uppsala Universitet, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
Hui, T. H., Itani, N., & O’Connell, J. F. (2024). Examining air travellers’ willingness to pay for non-voluntary environment-related fees: The case of SAF surcharge and carbon taxes. Highlights Sustain., 3(1), 61–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
International Air Transport Association. (2023). Sustainable aviation fuel: Driving net zero aviation. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/environment/sustainable-aviation-fuels/ [Google Scholar]
Jou, R. & Chen, T. Y. (2015). Willingness to pay of air passengers for carbon-offset. Sustainability, 7(3), 3071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kanekar, A. (2024). Chimeric city: Liminal spaces of Indian night markets. In The Interior Urbanism Theory Reader (pp. 309–316). Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
Kapoor, A. (2020). Helping reduce environmental impact of aviation with machine learning. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2012.09433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kuo, C.-W. (2022). Taiwan passengers’ willingness to pay for air sleeper seats. J. Adv. Transp., 2022(1), 5294377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Laphet, J. & Tandamrong, D. (2025). Exploring airline passengers’ environmental attitudes and behaviors: Factor analysis of carbon emission reduction strategies. Int. J. Environ. Impacts, 8(4), 655–665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Le, N. T. C. (2024). Voluntary carbon offsets in sustainable aviation research: A bibliometric analysis. Transp. Res. Procedia, 80, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Lee, A. & Koo, T. (2020). Exploratory study of the impact of significant ecotourism experience on voluntary carbon-offset behaviour of young travellers in their long-haul air travel choices. In Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism (pp. 971–979). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Lei, M., Pelz, S., Pachauri, S., & Cai, W. (2024). A dataset of income distribution on provincial, urban, and rural levels for China from 2020 to 2100. Sci. Data, 11, 1436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Liao, W., Fan, Y., & Wang, C. (2022). How does COVID-19 affect the implementation of CORSIA? J. Air Transp. Manage., 99, 102180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Liu, Y., Jiang, Q., & Gleasure, R. (2021). Hitting net-zero without stopping flying: Increasing air travelers’ likelihood to opt-in to voluntary carbon offsetting. J. Travel Res., 62(1), 21–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ma, W., Zhang, Y., & Cui, J. (2021). Chinese future frequent flyers’ willingness to pay for carbon emissions reduction. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 97, 102935. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
NSTDA. (2025). BCG Model: Fostering Sustainable Development in Thai Economy. https://www.nstda.or.th/en/images/pdf/BCG_Booklet1.pdf [Google Scholar]
Park, J., Ryu, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024). Factors influencing air passengers’ intention to purchase voluntary carbon offsetting programs: The moderating role of environmental knowledge. J. Air Transp. Manag., 118, 102619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Pickering, C. & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High. Educ. Res. Dev., 33(3), 534–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Pimiä, A., Urponen, A., & Kolehmainen, A. (2024). Green horizons ahead: Navigating carbon neutrality in European transportation by sky and sea. Econ. Cult., 21(1), 149–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Prussi, M., Lee, U., Wang, M., Malina, R., Valin, H., Taheripour, F., Velarde, C., Staples, M. D., Lonza, L., & Hileman, J. I. (2021). CORSIA: The first internationally adopted approach to calculate life-cycle GHG emissions for aviation fuels. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ranasinghe, J. P. R. C., Ranatunga, R. A. D. D. N., & Pattiyagedara, P. G. S. S. (2021). Operating carbon-neutral tourism: Systematic review & bibliometric analysis. J. Sustain. Tour. Entrep., 3(2), 139–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Rosales, R. C., Bellino, P., Elnahass, M., Heubaum, H., Lim, P., Lemaistre, P., Siman, K., & Sjögersten, S. (2021). Voluntary Carbon Markets in ASEAN: Challenges and Opportunities for Scaling Up. UK Government/ The British High Commission Singapore. [Google Scholar]
Rotaris, L., Giansoldati, M., & Scorrano, M. (2020). Are air travellers willing to pay for reducing or offsetting carbon emissions? Evidence from Italy. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 142, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
SCB Thailand. (2025). Foreign exchange rates. https://www.scb.co.th/th/personal-banking/foreign-exchange-rates.html [Google Scholar]
Schleich, J. & Alsheimer, S. (2024). The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5°C target? Ecol. Econ., 219, 108151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Seetaram, N., Song, H., Ye, S., & Page, S. (2018). Estimating willingness to pay air passenger duty. Ann. Tour. Res., 72, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Shaari, N. F., Fadzil, A. S. A., Aziz, N. A., Zainoddin, A. I., Jalal, M. Z. H. A., Harun, Q. N., Hassim, N. H., Mohamad, A., & Sulaiman, C. (2022). Stepping up and stepping out of COVID-19: Malaysian airline passengers’ travel behaviour and does it impact willingness to pay for carbon offset. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 1102(1), 012041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Shrivastava, N., Sharma, V., & Chaklader, B. (2019). A study to assess impact of carbon credit trading into costs and prices of different goods and services—A study from the airline industry. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues, 18(2), 126–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Sonnenschein, J. & Smedby, N. (2019). Designing air ticket taxes for climate change mitigation: Insights from a Swedish valuation study. Clim. Policy, 19(5), 651–663. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tang, B. J., Yan, R., Chen, J.-Y., & Ji, C.-J. (2024). Are air travelers willing to pay for mandatory carbon emission policies? Evidence from China. Sustain. Prod. Consum., 52, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tao, Y., Duan, M., & Deng, Z. (2021). Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to explain willingness towards voluntary carbon offsetting among Chinese consumers. Ecol. Econ., 185, 107068. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
TAT. (2022). TAT working to further develop carbon neutral tourism in Thailand. https://www.tatnews.org/2022/07/tat-working-to-further-develop-carbon-neutral-tourism-in-thailand/ [Google Scholar]
TGO. (2025). Voluntary carbon credit prices in Thailand. https://carbonmarket.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=Y2N0X3ByaWNl [Google Scholar]
UNWTO. (2025). Transforming tourism for climate action. https://www.unwto.org/sustainable-development/climate-action?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar]
Wang, L., Wang, J., Shen, P., Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2023). Low-carbon travel behavior in daily residence and tourism destination: Based on TPB-ABC integrated model. Sustainability, 15(19), 14349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wendt, N., Kipperberg, G., & Lindhjem, H. (2024). Consumer willingness to pay for emission reduction in air travel: A meta-analysis. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 134, 104347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Xue, C. H. & Bai, Y. P. (2023). Spatiotemporal characteristics and factors influencing urban tourism market network in Western China: Taking Chengdu as an example. Sustainability, 15(10), 8135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Yang, W. & Bi, C. (2024). Marketing the community-based eco-tourism for Thai and Chinese under the new media era for local authorities. J. Ecohumanism, 3(7), 4481–4496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Yirgu, K. W. & Kim, A. M. (2023). Estimating the effects of price-based environmental policies on aviation emissions at neighboring airports. J. Clean. Prod., 425, 138928. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zhang, B., Ritchie, B. W., Mair, J., & Driml, S. (2021). Air passengers’ preferences for aviation voluntary carbon offsetting: A co-benefits perspective. J. Travel Res., 61(6), 1437–1457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zhao, P. & Yuan, D. (2023). China’s transport system. In Population Growth and Sustainable Transport in China (pp. 31–58). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zhao, X. & Sun, D. (2024). Urban amenity preferences in internal labor migration networks: Evidence from 285 cities in China. SSRN Papers. [Google Scholar]
Zhao, Y. & Yu, H. (2018). A door-to-door travel time approach for evaluating modal competition of intercity travel: A focus on the proposed Dallas-Houston HSR route. J. Transp. Geogr., 72, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Zheng, S., Ge, Y. E., Fu, X., & Jiang, C. (2019). Voluntary carbon offset and airline alliance. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol., 123, 110–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Tandamrong, D., Laphet, J., & Gooncokkord, T. (2025). Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China. Chall. Sustain., 13(4), 535-545. https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130405
D. Tandamrong, J. Laphet, and T. Gooncokkord, "Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China," Chall. Sustain., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 535-545, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130405
@research-article{Tandamrong2025EvaluatingCC,
title={Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China},
author={Duangrat Tandamrong and Jakkawat Laphet and Tapsatit Gooncokkord},
journal={Challenges in Sustainability},
year={2025},
page={535-545},
doi={https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130405}
}
Duangrat Tandamrong, et al. "Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China." Challenges in Sustainability, v 13, pp 535-545. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130405
Duangrat Tandamrong, Jakkawat Laphet and Tapsatit Gooncokkord. "Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China." Challenges in Sustainability, 13, (2025): 535-545. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130405
TANDAMRONG D, LAPHET J, GOONCOKKORD T. Evaluating Carbon Credit Offsets: Carbon Neutral Tourism for Passengers Traveling from Thailand to China[J]. Challenges in Sustainability, 2025, 13(4): 535-545. https://doi.org/10.56578/cis130405
cc
©2025 by the author(s). Published by Acadlore Publishing Services Limited, Hong Kong. This article is available for free download and can be reused and cited, provided that the original published version is credited, under the CC BY 4.0 license.