Javascript is required
Aaker, D. A. & Day, G. S. (1990). Marketing Research (4th ed.). Singapore: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
Almeida García, F., Peláez Fernández, M. Á., Balbuena Vazquez, A., & Cortes Macias, R. (2016). Residents’ perceptions of tourism development in Benalmádena (Spain). Tour. Manag., 54, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Andereck, K., Valentine, K., Knopf, R., & Vogt, C. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Ann. Tour. Res., 32(4), 1056–1076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Badri, S. A. & Yarmohamadi, N. (2022). A game theory–based model for dental centers in a competitive market of dental tourism under government intervention. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 9(1), 78–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bagherzadeh Valami, H. & Raeinojehdehi, R. (2016). Ranking units in Data Envelopment Analysis with fuzzy data. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30(5), 2505–2516. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bansal, H. & Eiselt, H. A. (2004). Exploratory research of tourist motivations and planning. Tour. Manag., 25(3), 387–396. [Google Scholar]
Beard, J. G. & Ragheb, M. G. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. J. Leis. Res., 15(3), 219–228. [Google Scholar]
Bieger, T. & Laesser, C. (2002). Market segmentation by motivation: The case of Switzerland. J. Travel Res., 41(1), 68–76. [Google Scholar]
Boz, E., Gopinath, G., & Plagborg-Møller, M. (2017). Global Trade and the Dollar. National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Cha, S., McCleary, K. W., & Uysal, M. (1995). Travel motivations of Japanese overseas travelers: A factor-cluster segmentation approach. J. Travel Res., 34(1), 33–39. [Google Scholar]
Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Ind. Mark. Manag., 38(2), 152–158. [Google Scholar]
Cohen, E. (1972). Toward a sociology of international tourism. Soc. Res., 39(1), 164–182. [Google Scholar]
Crandall, R. & Slivken, K. (1980). Leisure attitudes and their management. In Leisure Attitudes and Their Management (pp. 261–284). [Google Scholar]
Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Ann. Tour. Res., 6(4), 408–424. [Google Scholar]
Cullinane, S. & Cullinane, K. (2003). Hong Kong city profile. Cities, 20(4), 279–288. [Google Scholar]
Cutter, S. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog. Hum. Geogr., 20, 529–539. [Google Scholar]
Dann, G. M. (1977). Anomie, ego-enhancement and tourism. Ann. Tour. Res., 4(4), 184–194. [Google Scholar]
Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural equation modeling with PLS. Tehran: Jahad Univ., 215(2), 224. [Google Scholar]
Dong, W. & Zhang, X. (2011). Urumqi. Cities, 28(1), 115–125. [Google Scholar]
Echtner, C. M. & Ritchie, J. B. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. J. Tour. Stud., 2(2), 2–12. [Google Scholar]
Ekinci, Y. & Hosany, S. (2006). Destination personality: An application of brand personality to tourism destinations. J. Travel Res., 45(2), 127–139. [Google Scholar]
Eyisi, A., Lee, D., & Trees, K. (2023). Local perceptions of tourism development and socio-cultural impacts in Nigeria. Tour. Plan. Dev., 20(4), 499–521. [Google Scholar]
Fodness, D. (1994). Measuring tourist motivation. Ann. Tour. Res., 21(3), 555–581. [Google Scholar]
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res., 18(3), 382–388. [Google Scholar]
Gajdosik, T., Gajdosikova, Z., & Strazanova, R. (2018). Residents perception of sustainable tourism destination development: A destination governance issue. Glob. Bus. Financ. Rev., 23(1), 24–35. [Google Scholar]
Gitelson, R. & Kerstetter, D. (1995). The influence of friends and relatives in travel decision-making. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 3(3), 59–68. [Google Scholar]
Gray, H. P. (1970). International travel--international trade. Lexington, MA, Heath Lexington Books. [Google Scholar]
Guillaumont, P. (2010). Assessing the economic vulnerability of small island developing states and the least developed countries. J. Dev. Stud., 46, 828–854. [Google Scholar]
Hall, C. M. & Page, S. J. (2014). The Geography Of Tourism and Recreation: Environment, Place and Space. Oxford, UK: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Hall, T. E. (2001). Opinion filter in recreation research: The effect of including “No opinion” and “Not notice” response categories in questionnaires. Tour. Anal., 6(1), 15. [Google Scholar]
Han, S. S. & Wang, Y. (2001). Chongqing. Cities, 18(2), 115–125. [Google Scholar]
Han, S. S. & Wu, X. (2004). Wuhan. Cities, 21(4), 349–362. [Google Scholar]
Hartman, S. (2023). Destination governance in times of change: A complex adaptive systems perspective to improve tourism destination development. J. Tour. Futures, 9(2), 267–278. [Google Scholar]
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar]
Hockenbury, D. H. (2009). Study Guide for Psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating Model Fit. [Google Scholar]
Huang, C., Lin, F., Chu, D., Wang, L., Liao, J., & Wu, J. (2021). Spatiotemporal evolution and trend prediction of tourism economic vulnerability in China’s major tourist cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10, 644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Manag. J., 20(2), 195–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Jamrozy, U. & Uysal, M. (1994). Travel motivation variations of overseas German visitors. Glob. Tour. Behav., 135–160. [Google Scholar]
Jang, S., Morrison, A. M., & O’Leary, J. T. (2004). The tourism efficient frontier: An approach to selecting the most efficient travel segment mixes. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 16(4), 33–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Jurowski, C., Uysal, M., & Noe, F. P. (1993). US Virgin Islands National Park: A factor-cluster segmentation study. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 1(4), 3–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents? Tour. Manag., 36, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kleiven, J. (1998). Skalaer for Måling av Aktivitets- og Motivm⊘nstre i en norsk lokalbefolknings ferie og fritid (Working paper no. 77/1988). Lillehammer: Lillehammer College. [Google Scholar]
Lee, G., O’Leary, J. T., Lee, S. H., & Morrison, A. (2002). Comparison and contrast of push and pull motivational effects on trip behavior: An application of a multinomial logistic regression model. Tour. Anal., 7(2), 89–104. [Google Scholar]
Leitmann, J. (1994). Tianjin. Cities, 11(5), 275–276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Li, F. (2013). Study of vulnerability measurement of Chinese tourism economic system: Based on SPA. Tour. Sci., 27, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
Liang, Z. & Xie, L. (2011). On the vulnerability of economic system of traditional tourism cities: A case from Guilin. Tour. Trib., 26, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
Mayo, E. J. & Jarvis, L. P. (1981). Understanding the theme park visitor: A psychological perspective. Ann. Tour. Res., 8(2), 269–274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Middleton, V. (2001). The importance of micro-businesses in European tourism. Rural Tour. Recreat.: Princ. Pract., 197–201. [Google Scholar]
Mou, N., Zheng, Y., Makkonen, T., Yang, T., Tang, J. J., & Song, Y. (2020). Tourists’ digital footprint: The spatial patterns of tourist flows in Qingdao, China. Tour. Manag., 81, 104151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ng, M. K. (2003). Shenzhen. Cities, 20(6), 429–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Nojehdehi, R. R., Valami, H., & Najafi, S. E. (2011). Evaluating the membership degree of the DMU’s related to the fuzzy frontier in DEA with fuzzy input-output levels: A geometrical approach. Trends Adv. Sci. Eng., 4, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
Nunkoo, R. & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Residents’ satisfaction with community attributes and support for tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Res., 35(2), 171–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Oh, H. C., Uysal, M., & Weaver, P. A. (1995). Product bundles and market segments based on travel motivations: A canonical correlation approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 14(2), 123–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Plog, S. C. (1974). Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. Cornell Hotel Restaur. Adm. Q., 14(4), 55–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Polsky, C., Neff, R., & Yarnal, B. (2007). Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Glob. Environ. Chang., 17, 472–485. [Google Scholar]
Pourmorshed, S. S., Sajadi, S. M., & Sadeghian Esfahani, S. (2022). Eco-tourism residences in Iran: A multiple case study research with a creative tourism approach. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 9(4), 427–441. [Google Scholar]
Qin, F. & Chen, G. (2022). Vulnerability of tourist cities’ economic systems amid the COVID-19 pandemic: System characteristics and formation mechanisms—A case study of 46 major tourist cities in China. Sustain., 14(5), 2661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Rasinojehdehi, R. & Valami, H. B. (2023). A comprehensive neutrosophic model for evaluating the efficiency of airlines based on the SBM model of network DEA. Decis. Mak.: Appl. Manag. Eng., 6(2), 880–906. [Google Scholar]
Rasoolimanesh, S., Jaafar, M., Kock, N., & Ramayah, T. (2015). A revised framework of social exchange theory to investigate the factors influencing residents’ perceptions. Tour. Manag. Perspect., 16, 335–345. [Google Scholar]
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Noor, S. M., & Jaafar, M. (2019). Positive and negative perceptions of residents toward tourism development: Formative or reflective. In Quantitative Tourism Research in Asia: Current Status and Future Directions. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
Ryan, C. & Glendon, I. (1998). Application of leisure motivation scale to tourism. Ann. Tour. Res., 25(1), 169–184. [Google Scholar]
Šegota, T., Mihalič, T., & Perdue, R. R. (2024). Resident perceptions and responses to tourism: Individual vs community level impacts. J. Sustain. Tour., 32(2), 340–363. [Google Scholar]
Šerić, M., Došen, Đ. O., & Mikulić, J. (2023). Antecedents and moderators of positive word of mouth communication among tourist destination residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr. Issues Tour., 26(2), 224–241. [Google Scholar]
Sreya, P. S., Parayil, C., Aswathy, N., Bonny, B. P., Aiswarya, T. P., & Nameer, P. O. (2021). Economic vulnerability of small-scale coastal households to extreme weather events in Southern India. Mar. Policy, 131, 104608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tang, U. W. & Sheng, N. (2009). Macao. Cities, 26(4), 220–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Therkelsen, A. (2003). Imagining places: Image formation of tourists and its consequences for destination promotion. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour., 3(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Turnbull, D. R. & Uysal, M. (1995). An exploratory study of German visitors to the Caribbean: Push and pull motivations. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 4(2), 85–92. [Google Scholar]
Uysal, M., McGehee, N. G., & Loker-Murphy, L. (1996). The Australian international pleasure travel market: Motivations from a gendered perspective. 7(1), 45–57. [Google Scholar]
Vareiro, L., Remoaldo, P., & Cadima Ribeiro, J. (2013). Residents’ perceptions of tourism impacts in Guimarães (Portugal): A cluster analysis. Curr. Issues Tour., 16(6), 535–551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wang, M., Liu, S., & Wang, C. (2023). Spatial distribution and influencing factors of high-quality tourist attractions in Shandong Province, China. PLoS One, 18(7), e0288472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wang, P., Qiao, W., Wang, Y., Cao, S., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Urban drought vulnerability assessment-A framework to integrate socio-economic, physical, and policy index in a vulnerability contribution analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc., 54, 102004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wang, Y., Li, G., & Bai, X. (2005). A residential survey on urban tourism impacts in Harbin. China Tour. Res., 1(1), 116–129. [Google Scholar]
Wang, Y. P. & Hague, C. (1995). Baoji. Cities, 12(5), 361–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wu, P., Han, Y., & Tian, M. (2015). The measurement and comparative study of carbon dioxide emissions from tourism in typical provinces in China. Acta Ecol. Sin., 35(6), 184–190. [Google Scholar]
Xu, J. & Yeh, A. G. (2003). Guangzhou. Cities, 20(5), 361–374. [Google Scholar]
Yazdani, R., Taghipourian, M. J., Pourpasha, M. M., & Hosseini, S. S. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting brand strengthening drivers in e-commerce: A study of the Iranian tourism industry. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 9(4), 374–383. [Google Scholar]
Yin, P., Liu, S., & Dan, P. (2017). Analysis on the vulnerability and obstacle indicators in island-type tourism destination: Take Zhoushan city for example. Econ. Geogr., 37, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
Yuan, S. & McDonald, C. (1990). Motivational determinates of international pleasure time. J. Travel Res., 29(1), 42–44. [Google Scholar]
Search
Open Access
Research article

Perceptions of Overseas Residents on Tourism Development in Qingdao: An Impact Analysis

sahand abdinematabad1,
roghaye ebadikhah2,
mehdi pourabdollah3,
reza raeinojehdehi4*
1
Department of Tourism Management, College of Management, Ocean University of China, 266100 Qingdao, China
2
Department of Humanities, Social Research, Olum Tahghighate University, 1477893855 Tehran, Iran
3
Department of Mathematics, Tabriz University, 5166616471 Tabriz, Iran
4
Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, 1477893855 Tehran, Iran
TourismSpectrum: Diversity & Dynamics
|
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024
|
Pages 1-15
Received: 12-16-2023,
Revised: 02-18-2024,
Accepted: 03-14-2024,
Available online: 03-27-2024
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

In the realm of global economics, tourism emerges as a pivotal sector, demanding strategic planning and policy formulation for sustainable development. The prosperity of tourism destinations is contingent upon the inclusivity of stakeholder perspectives, especially those impacted by the tourism industry. While substantial research has delved into local residents' perceptions of tourism development, the viewpoints of foreign residents remain conspicuously underexplored. This oversight necessitates an investigation into the nuanced impacts of tourism development, particularly within the Chinese context. A comprehensive questionnaire survey was administered to gauge the perceptions of overseas residents regarding tourism development in Qingdao, a prominent tourist locale in Eastern China. Findings indicate that perceptions among this demographic are heterogeneous, influenced by factors such as age, income, and personal affiliations with the tourism sector. It is demonstrated that the economic, socio-cultural, and environmental impacts of tourism are perceived variably, contingent upon these demographic variables. This analysis underscores the importance of integrating diverse resident perspectives into tourism planning and policy-making, to foster sustainability in tourism destination development. Such an approach is essential for aligning tourism development with the expectations and well-being of both local and foreign residents, thereby ensuring the long-term viability of tourism destinations. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by filling a critical gap in understanding the impacts of tourism development from the perspective of overseas residents in Qingdao, thus offering valuable insights for stakeholders in crafting inclusive and sustainable tourism strategies.
Keywords: Tourism development impacts, Economic impacts, Socio-cultural impacts, Environmental impacts, Overseas residents' perceptions, Qingdao, Sustainability in tourism

1. Introduction

Since the 1950s onwards, tourism has been an essential driver for the economic development of many regions. As a result of being exposed to the numerous beneficial or harmful consequences of tourism development, the locals of a destination experience significant changes. As a result, it has been determined that locals should be included in the decision, making tourism and destination development processes critical (B​a​d​r​i​ ​&​ ​Y​a​r​m​o​h​a​m​a​d​i​,​ ​2​0​2​2; C​r​o​m​p​t​o​n​,​ ​1​9​7​9; H​a​r​t​m​a​n​,​ ​2​0​2​3).

The rapid global growth of tourism has had unavoidable consequences for host communities' perceptions and attitudes toward the industry's development. There has been a significant increase in interest in residents and their perceptions of tourism and its development since the 1970s, giving rise to many experts and academics researching the residents' attitudes (E​y​i​s​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​3; Š​e​g​o​t​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​4). In this context, an attitude tends to respond positively or negatively to a particular idea, object, person, or situation, which induces a person's reaction (H​o​c​k​e​n​b​u​r​y​,​ ​2​0​0​9).

The economic, socio-cultural, and environmental consequences of tourism in general, as well as locals' perceptions of tourism impacts in particular, have long been studied by academics (B​a​g​h​e​r​z​a​d​e​h​ ​V​a​l​a​m​i​ ​&​ ​R​a​e​i​n​o​j​e​h​d​e​h​i​,​ ​2​0​1​6; N​o​j​e​h​d​e​h​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​1; R​a​s​i​n​o​j​e​h​d​e​h​i​ ​&​ ​V​a​l​a​m​i​,​ ​2​0​2​3). Nevertheless, the significant volume and scope of research have primarily been directed toward the residents of a tourist destination (C​h​e​n​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​0​9; G​a​j​d​o​s​i​k​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​8; P​o​u​r​m​o​r​s​h​e​d​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2; Š​e​r​i​ć​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​3) and have almost entirely ignored the foreign residents who live in the same location.

Of course, this is understandable, as the particular reason for this circumstance can be attributed to the high likelihood of overseas residents comprising only a tiny fraction of the population in any given destination, who may also (for any reason) reside there temporarily. However, despite their smaller numbers and temporary status, each foreign resident likely has a considerable number of friends and relatives, or even, in their case, an active presence on social media platforms, followers, and viewers inside and outside of their home country and beyond. Therefore, it is not too farfetched to consider each of them as the representatives of their respective countries and cultures and as unofficial cultural ambassadors of the country and the city they reside in. Any aspect of their daily life or the major and minor events they experience can be shared with their friends, relatives, or audience and, as a result, have a promoting or demoting effect on the image of their place of residence.

Furthermore, these overseas residents likely know more about the likes and interests of other people in their respective countries and what they would find attractive in their current residence. Thus, their ideas and suggestions might be precious for future tourism planning and development of that location to attract more international tourists.

The researcher has chosen the coastal city of Qingdao, located in the Shandong province of the People's Republic of China, as the setting for this case study. The particular reasons for this decision are that Qingdao is a major tourist city on China's eastern coastline with a relatively high number of foreign residents, the importance observed (by the researcher) given to the city's image as an international city and its further internationalization by city officials and authorities, and the fact that the researcher himself is also, at the time of conducting the research, a resident in the city.

Qingdao is a beautiful seaside city in Shandong Province with about 730 kilometers of shoreline. The city lies 750 kilometers southeast of Beijing and is well known as a tourism destination and resort in China and internationally.

Qingdao's population is about 9.49 million, and its tourism industry is developing rapidly. Preliminary statistics show that the total number of tourists received in the city throughout 2019 was 109 million, an increase of 9% since 2018; the total tourism revenue was 195.59 billion Yuan, an increase of 13% since 2018. At the end of the year, there were 110 Aleve tourist attractions. Among them was one 5A-level tourist attraction, twenty-six 4A-level tourist attractions, and sixty-seven 3A-level tourist attractions. There are 98 star-rated hotels in the city, out of which there are nine 5-star hotels, twenty-four 4-star hotels, and sixty-two 3-star hotels. There are 575 travel agencies, among which 60 are operating outbound tourism businesses, and 515 are operating inbound and domestic tourism businesses (2019 Qingdao National Economic and Social Development Statistical Bulletin, March 2020).

The spatial and temporal characteristics of tourist mobility and the subsequent various socio-economic impacts are at the core of tourist flow research. As such, scholars have tried to explore the patterns of tourist flows but have, thus far, tended to focus mainly on the movement of tourists between attractions (M​o​u​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​0). Profiling Qingdao will add to the growing body of literature on important cities already documented, including Tianjin (L​e​i​t​m​a​n​n​,​ ​1​9​9​4), Baoji (W​a​n​g​ ​&​ ​H​a​g​u​e​,​ ​1​9​9​5), Chongqing (H​a​n​ ​&​ ​W​a​n​g​,​ ​2​0​0​1), Shenzhen (N​g​,​ ​2​0​0​3), Guangzhou (X​u​ ​&​ ​Y​e​h​,​ ​2​0​0​3), Wuhan (H​a​n​ ​&​ ​W​u​,​ ​2​0​0​4), Urumqi (D​o​n​g​ ​&​ ​Z​h​a​n​g​,​ ​2​0​1​1), Hong Kong (C​u​l​l​i​n​a​n​e​ ​&​ ​C​u​l​l​i​n​a​n​e​,​ ​2​0​0​3) and Macau (T​a​n​g​ ​&​ ​S​h​e​n​g​,​ ​2​0​0​9). Taking 46 major tourist cities in China as a case, the vulnerability indices and main vulnerability-induced factors were analyzed using a comprehensive assessment model and a factor identification model. The results revealed several trends (Q​i​n​ ​&​ ​C​h​e​n​,​ ​2​0​2​2). In the study W​u​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​5​), it was investigated the measurement and comparative study of carbon dioxide emissions from tourism in typical provinces in China. Also in the study W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​3​), it was investigated Spatial distribution and influencing factors of high-quality tourist attractions in Shandong Province, China. That Work Addressed two prime dimensions of tourism-related vulnerability assessment (i.e., sensitivity and responsiveness (C​u​t​t​e​r​,​ ​1​9​9​6; G​u​i​l​l​a​u​m​o​n​t​,​ ​2​0​1​0; P​o​l​s​k​y​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​0​7) and refers to relevant indices from H​u​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​1​), S​r​e​y​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​1​), W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​0​), L​i​a​n​g​ ​&​ ​X​i​e​ ​(​2​0​1​1​), L​i​ ​(​2​0​1​3​), and Y​i​n​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​7​). M​a​y​o​ ​&​ ​J​a​r​v​i​s​ ​(​1​9​8​1​) continue their topic by demonstrating how to attain an ideal balance between adaptability and complexity by combining predictability and novelty, change and unpredictability. To determine tourist motivation and strategies of categorizing tourists with their beneficial stimulus fragmentation, multi-relational orientation models and multidimensional precedence scaling were used. Tourists are divided into distinct types in this infrastructure based on their trip stimulus. Different structures have been employed in tourism research on tourist motivation. Table 1 summarizes a number of research that look at a variety of factors in tourist motivation (B​a​n​s​a​l​ ​&​ ​E​i​s​e​l​t​,​ ​2​0​0​4).

Table 1. Motivations in tourism

Author

Stimuli in Tourism

G​r​a​y​ ​(​1​9​7​0​)

Family, different match, new, fresh

C​o​h​e​n​ ​(​1​9​7​2​)

Official: Individual and mass tourist

Informal: Seeker, bulk

P​l​o​g​ ​(​1​9​7​4​)

Familiar, healthy, safe, adventurous

D​a​n​n​ ​(​1​9​7​7​)

Progress of the soul

C​r​o​m​p​t​o​n​ ​(​1​9​7​9​)

Escape, Self-Exploration, Self-Evaluation, Rest, Prestige, Return, Promotion of Kinship, Social Interaction, Education

C​r​a​n​d​a​l​l​ ​&​ ​S​l​i​v​k​e​n​ ​(​1​9​8​0​)

The pleasure of abandoning civilization, escaping daily life and responsibilities, physical activity, creativity, relaxation, social connection, meeting new people, non-sexual encounters, family interaction, cognition, social power, respect for others, motivator search, self-activism, acquisition, interaction, competition, Time consuming and avoidance of fatigue, intellectual aesthetics

M​a​y​o​ ​&​ ​J​a​r​v​i​s​ ​(​1​9​8​1​)

Compatibility and complexity

B​e​a​r​d​ ​&​ ​R​a​g​h​e​b​ ​(​1​9​8​3​)

Intellectual, social, dominance / competition, avoidance of stimuli

Y​u​a​n​ ​&​ ​M​c​D​o​n​a​l​d​ ​(​1​9​9​0​)

Escape, Modernity, Prestige, Promotion of Relationships, Rest / Entertainment, Culture and History, Budget, Desert, Comfort, Facilities, Hunting,

G​i​t​e​l​s​o​n​ ​&​ ​K​e​r​s​t​e​t​t​e​r​ ​(​1​9​9​5​)

Relax, thrill, socialize, explore

J​u​r​o​w​s​k​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​1​9​9​3​)

Re-experiencing family togetherness, sports, cultural experience, escape, desert / natural / cultural heritage,

F​o​d​n​e​s​s​ ​(​1​9​9​4​)

Five functions: knowledge, reduction of punishment, self-esteem, self-promotion, increase of reward

J​a​m​r​o​z​y​ ​&​ ​U​y​s​a​l​ ​(​1​9​9​4​)

Being together, sports activities, adventure and thrills, familiar environment, prestige, practical sports environment, unique natural environment, healthy environment, sunny environment, cheap environment, cultural activities, fun, sightseeing, local culture, culture and various cuisines, villages, mountains

T​u​r​n​b​u​l​l​ ​&​ ​U​y​s​a​l​ ​(​1​9​9​5​)

Cultural experiences, getaways, family reunions, sports, prestige, heritage / culture, cities near the border, rest, going to the beach

O​h​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​1​9​9​5​)

Knowledge, kinship interaction, sport, prestige, escape, rest, nature and desert

C​h​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​1​9​9​5​)

Rest, knowledge, travel, family sports

U​y​s​a​l​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​1​9​9​6​)

Sports and adventure, cultural experience, family and kinship, prestige, escape, heritage and culture, creative activities, comfort, relaxation, field resources, cities near the border, budget-creating environments.

R​y​a​n​ ​&​ ​G​l​e​n​d​o​n​ ​(​1​9​9​8​)

Rest, social, intellectual, mastery

K​l​e​i​v​e​n​ ​(​1​9​9​8​)

Sun, friends, culture, nature, family, peace, silence, freedom and authority

J​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​0​4​)

Modernity / Nature Seekers, Escape, Rest Seekers, Family, Field Seekers

L​e​e​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​0​2​)

Escape, Searching for Modernity, Resting, Planning a Trip, Family Together

B​i​e​g​e​r​ ​&​ ​L​a​e​s​s​e​r​ ​(​2​0​0​2​)

Nightlife, comfort, family, nature, culture, scenery, freedom, sports, sunshine

The idea of this research came to the researcher's mind due to his interest in tourism development and his observations during his residency in Qingdao on how eager the public and private sectors and institutions in Qingdao are about promoting the city's international image and also how much sincere importance is being given by the government bodies, such as the Tourism and Culture Bureau of Qingdao city and the Tourism and Culture Bureau of Shandong, to its further internationalization via hosting numerous events and activities tailored and targeted specifically for foreigners in the town and the province.

The primary goal of this study is to learn more about the perceptions of the overseas residents in Qingdao regarding the impacts of tourism development and obtain their insights and ideas on how to refine and enhance the tourism development in Qingdao to further boost its international image and attractiveness as a tourism destination.

The findings of this study are intended to be used by local and regional authorities as well as the private and public sectors to evaluate and assess the current impacts of tourism development on overseas residents' daily lives and their perceptions and insights regarding how to refine further and tailor the development of tourism and other businesses in the city to attract more tourists, especially international ones.

2. Conceptual Model

The conceptual framework for the present study is depicted in Figure 1. This framework posits that Socio-Cultural Impacts, Economic Impacts, and Environmental Impacts function as independent variables affecting the dependent variable, Perceptions of Overseas Residents Regarding Tourism Development. Furthermore, the variables Touristic Strengths of Qingdao and Touristic Weaknesses of Qingdao influence the variable Improving Tourism Quality.

Figure 1. The conceptual model (W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​0​5)
2.1 Research method

Data will be collected through an exploratory method via a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire will be delivered online and/or in a hand-delivered form(s) to the foreigners residing in Qingdao. The questionnaire will contain three main parts. The first part includes questions inquiring about the demographic background of the respondents, including gender, age, and nationality, type of residence, length of residency, level of income, their involvement in tourism, and so on. The second part of the questionnaire will contain 30 to 40 statements referring to the positive and negative impacts of tourism development in Qingdao. A five-point Likert-type scale will be used to measure the degree of the respondents' agreement or disagreements with the statements (in which a score of 1 represents "strongly disagree" and a score of 5 represents "strongly agree"). A score of "0" will mean "don't know" for avoiding the "filter effect" (H​a​l​l​,​ ​2​0​0​1). The third part of the questionnaire will have 1-2 questions for the respondents to communicate what they find attractive and unattractive about Qingdao as an international tourism destination. The partial least squares model (PLS), completed in two steps, will be the statistical method employed in this study. The validity of study outcomes in diverse sample quantities is the key advantage of this modeling method over other methods. It is straightforward to replicate a survey, and the questions can be answered quickly by people of all ages (A​a​k​e​r​ ​&​ ​D​a​y​,​ ​1​9​9​0). Two forms of logical validity and construct validity were studied in order to assess the questionnaire's validity, and content validity, apparent validity, and component validity (factor analysis) were examined in this respect. Composite tests and mean variance were used to determine convergent validity and correlation. Convergent validity and correlation of a structure need a reliability greater than 0.8 and a mean variance of at least 0.5. (C​h​e​n​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​0​9). The AVE index indicates how much of the variance in the examined structure was influenced by the structure's species. The AVE index, also known as convergent validity, is used to assess the validity of a structure. In this work, the combined reliability (CR) approach was employed to estimate structural reliability. In addition, Cronbach's alpha index is utilized to assess the structural reliability in this area. Therefore, the above indicators, along with the significant study of factor loads, were used to confirm the suitability of the types of structures. Factor loads greater than 0.4 have good validity (F​o​r​n​e​l​l​ ​&​ ​L​a​r​c​k​e​r​,​ ​1​9​8​1). In a cautious approach, operating loads greater than 0.7 have good validity (H​u​l​l​a​n​d​,​ ​1​9​9​9). In general, if the value of t is greater than 1.96 times, the factor at the level of 0.05 is significant and approved. The correlation value of the questions of a variable with that structure is used to determine factor loads. If this number is equal to or more than 0.4, the variation between the variable and its questions is greater than the variance of the structure's measurement error. The measurement model's reliability is satisfactory. The crucial thing here is that if the researcher encounters values less than 0.4 after computing the factor loads between the structures and the questions, he must amend the question or eliminate it from the study model. The factor load indicates the strength of the link between the factor (the hidden variable) and the visible variable.

In Table 2, the presented information delineates the research variables under scrutiny, the corresponding measurable items utilized for assessment, the sources from which data were derived, and the factor loads associated with each variable.

Table 2. Research measurable items

Research Variables

Measurable Item

Source

Factor Load

Economic Impact

EC1

EC2

EC3

EC4

EC5

EC6

W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​0​)

B​o​z​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​7​)

0.689

0.665

0.427

0.644

0.403

0.919

Socio-cultural Impact

SC1

SC2

SC3

SC4

SC5

SC6

SC7

SC8

SC9

SC10

SC11

SC12

W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​0​)

B​o​z​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​7​)

0.770

0.892

0.762

0.771

0.843

0.827

0.680

0.568

0.528

0.541

0.401

0.584

Environmental Impact

EN1

EN2

EN3

EN4

EN5

EN6

W​a​n​g​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​2​0​)

B​o​z​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​1​7​)

0.483

0.847

0.596

0.454

0.794

Most Attractive and Unattractive Aspects of Qingdao

1

2

-------

0.513

0.494

2.2 Measurement Reliability Evaluation (External Model)

Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Rho Dillon and Goldstein, and the CR criterion, shown in Table 3, are used to evaluate the model's dependability at this stage. Table 3 also shows the AVE indices.

Table 3. Results of validity and reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of research model components in PLS software

Variables

(AVE)

Credit Result

(CR)

Rho

ALFA

Economic Impacts

0.456

Suitable

0.796

0.843

0.707

Socio-cultural impacts

0,468

Suitable

0.828

0.828

0.745

Environmental Impacts

0.511

Suitable

0.707

0.930

0.898

The most attractive about Qingdao

1.000

Suitable

1.000

1.000

1.000

Most unattractive about Qingdao

1.000

Suitable

1.000

1.000

1.000

The composite reliability for all variables is better than 0.8, and the mean-variance for all variables is greater than 0.5, indicating high convergence validity. All questionnaire elements are included in the analysis of the final research model according to the suitability of their validity.

3. Data Analysis

In the present study, we have made a descriptive study of the observations by presenting the relevant tables and graphs. In this section, we have shown the questions of the questionnaire, which have an almost general aspect and have been asked of individuals by drawing different tables and graphs, such as gender, age, nationality, level of education, residence permit, type of residence, length of stay, and distance. From residents' houses to the nearest tourist attraction, the level of engagement with tourists, personal economic reliance on tourism, and income level are presented to examine the participants in the study in terms of their demographic status.

As shown in Figure 2, the gender results show that 54.16% of the participants in the study are male and 45.83% are female. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the gender question. The age results show that 51.5% of the participants in the study are less than 25 years old, 38.28% are 25.45 years old, and 10.15% are 46 and older. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the age question. The results of nationality show that 28.64% of the participants in the study are from other nationalities: 24.21% are Korean, 16.6% are Russian, 13.02% are American, 10.15% are Pakistani, 5.73% are from the UK, and 1.56% are from Zimbabwe. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the nationality question. The results of the level of education show that 26.30% of the participants in the study are in high school, 37.76% are graduates, 25.52% are post-graduates, 5.98% are Ph.D.s, and 4.42% are other. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the level of education question. Having a residence permit or not shows that 100% of the participants in the study have a residence permit. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the question about having a residence permit or not. The results of the type of residency show that 54.42% of the study participants are on study visas, 19.79% are on work visas, 14.06% are on business visas, 11.71% are on, etc. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the type of residency question. The results of Length of Residency show that 11.45% of the participants in the study are <2 years, 54.94% are 2.5 years, 25.78% are 5.10 years, and 7.81% are 10.20 years. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the length of residency question. The results of distance from the resident's home to the nearest tourism attraction show that 58.07% of the participants in the study are <5km, 28.90% are between 5km and 10km, 9.89% are between 10km and 20km, and 3.12% are >20km. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the distance from the resident's home to the nearest tourism attraction question. The results of the degree of encounter with tourists show that 39.06% of the participants in the study are frequent, 33.85% are sometimes, and 27.08% are rarely. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the question about the degree of encountering tourists. The results of personal economic reliance on tourism show that 9.89% of the study participants are highly reliant on tourism, 11.71% somehow rely on tourism, and 78.38% do not. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the question of personal economic reliance on tourism. The results of the income level show that 43.75% of the participants in the study are <5000.RMB, 52.60% are 5000.10000.RMB, 3.12% are 10000.30000 RMB, and 0.5% are >100000 RMB. The number 384 in the last line indicates that everyone answered the income level question.

Furthermore, descriptive statistics, including variables’ min, max, mean and S.D, are shown in Table 4.

Figure 2. Descriptive statistics of respondents
Table 4. Descriptive statistics of research variables

Descriptive Statistics

N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Improving Tourism Quality

384

2.00

5.00

3.9010

0.92151

Perceptions Of the Overseas Residents

384

2.50

4.21

3.3767

0.47302

EC

384

1.33

3.83

2.7630

0.46783

SC

384

2.83

4.58

3.7971

0.64443

EN

384

2.00

4.17

3.1497

0.42300

Valid N (listwise)

384

3.1 Test the Conceptual Model of Research

The research model is reviewed in three stages. In the first stage, the external model of the research is examined. In the second stage, it is the turn of the internal model to be examined, and in the third stage, the general model of the research is reviewed.

3.1.1 Evaluation of the measurement model (external model)

In examining the external model of the research, first, the factor load of the study's dependent variable questions (or indicators) is reviewed. Then, the internal model's reliability and validity are checked.

The degree to which measuring devices produce consistent findings in similar settings is referred to as dependability. This signifies that the questionnaire has full reliability if the researcher performs it again or in parallel and gets the same findings. Factor load coefficients, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and CR are all used to determine reliability.

3.1.2 Structural model evaluation (internal model)

Unlike measurement models, the structural model section is not concerned with queries (explicit variables); only hidden variables and their interactions are investigated (D​a​v​a​r​i​ ​&​ ​R​e​z​a​z​a​d​e​h​,​ ​2​0​1​3).

3.1.3 Significance coefficients Z (t-value values)

Several criteria are employed to assess the fit of the study structural model, the first and most fundamental of which is the t-statistic. The significant number t is the most fundamental criterion for assessing the link between variables in the model (the structural portion). If the sum of these figures is more than 1.96, the connection between the variables is true, and the hypotheses are confirmed. The research has a 0.95 confidence level. At a confidence level of 0.95, 0.05 acknowledges the link between variables. Naturally, statistics only reveal the link's validity; the relationship's intensity between the variables cannot be measured with them. The standardized coefficient can be used to understand the intensity of the relationship and compare it with other relationships (relationships in the model). According to the interpretative model in structural equation modeling, if the t-statistic of a path is larger than 1.96, the corresponding path is significant at the 95 percent level. Hence, all of the research hypotheses are verified in this study.

Examination of the indicators of the final research model also shows the high validity of the model. As a result, according to model approval, we report the results of path analysis in the form of a research model shown in Table 5.

Significance coefficients t (t-value):

Several criteria are used to evaluate the fit of the confirmatory factor model of the research, the first and most basic of which are the coefficients of significance t or t-value. The most basic criterion for measuring the relationship between factors in the model is the significant number of t. If the value of these numbers exceeds 1.96, it indicates the correctness of the relationship between the factors and thus confirms the research hypotheses at a confidence level of 0.95. Of course, it should be noted that numbers only show the correctness of the relationship, and the intensity of the relationship between the factors cannot be measured by them.

Table 5. Path coefficient values and t.statistic Hypotheses related to research model paths

Relation

Path Coefficient

t

P-value

Result

Economic Impacts

🡆

Perception of foreigners about tourism development

0.209

13.960

0.000

Confirmation

Socio-cultural impacts

🡆

0.652

46.719

0.000

Confirmation

Environmental Impacts

🡆

0.260

19.716

0.000

Confirmation

What things do you find most attractive about Qingdao?

🡆

Most Attractive and Unattractive Aspects of Qingdao

0.513

81.129

0.000

Confirmation

What are the most unattractive aspects of Qingdao?

🡆

0.494

122.013

0.000

Confirmation

3.2 Indicators of Structural Research Model Fit

The quality and fit of the model are measured using numerous ways in the partial least squares (PLS) methodology.

Determination coefficient R2 (R squared).

The coefficients R2 connected to the model's endogenous (dependent) latent variables are the first criterion for analyzing the structural model. R2 is a criterion that demonstrates the influence of an exogenous variable on an endogenous variable and is used to connect the measurement and structural parts of structural equation modeling. And the criteria values for weak, medium, and strong values are 0.19, 0.33, and 0.67, respectively. The more R2 is connected to a model's endogenous structures, the better the model fits. In a model, H​e​n​s​e​l​e​r​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​0​9​) argue that if one or two foreign structures impact an endogenous structure. R2 values of 0.33 and higher show the strength of the association between that structure and endogenous structures. R2 grows as there are more independent variables. As a result, the more independent variables are used to describe a dependent variable, the higher the R2 value is required to fit the model. It's worth noting that the value of R2 is determined only for the model's dependent (endogenous) structures; the value of this criterion is zero for exogenous structures. And it shows how an external variable affects an endogenous variable. For the proposed model, R2 and adjusted R2 are shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Determination coefficient R2

Variable

R Square

R Square Adjusted

Perception of foreign residents about tourism development

0.977

0.977

Most Attractive and Unattractive Aspects of Qingdao

1.000

1.000

3.3 Predictive Quality (Q²)

Q2 is the second criterion to consider while assessing the structural model. This criterion determines the predictive capability of the model. Models with a good structural fit should be able to anticipate the properties of the endogenous structures in the model. H​e​n​s​e​l​e​r​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​ ​(​2​0​0​9​) defined values of 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 to reflect the structure's or associated exogenous structures' poor, medium, and strong predictive power. Notably, this value is only calculated for endogenous structures in the model with reflected indices (D​a​v​a​r​i​ ​&​ ​R​e​z​a​z​a​d​e​h​,​ ​2​0​1​3). For the proposed model, Q2 is shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Predictive quality (Q²)

Variable

SSO

SSE

Q² (=1.SSE/SSO)

Perception of foreign residents about tourism development

384.000

16.955

0.956

Most Attractive and Unattractive Aspects of Qingdao

384.000

9.449

0.975

3.4 Review of the General Research Model

After the GOF criterion is obsolete, the standardized mean square root mean index (SRMR) is used to evaluate the overall model, which is less than 0.1 or 0.08 (H​e​n​s​e​l​e​r​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​0​9; H​u​ ​&​ ​B​e​n​t​l​e​r​,​ ​1​9​9​5). For the proposed model, the SRMR index is shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Root index of standardized squared average squares

SRMR

Saturated Model

Estimated Model

Perception of foreigners about tourism development

0.163

0.163

Most Attractive and Unattractive Aspects of Qingdao

0.000

0.000

The hypotheses are measured in this model, as shown in Table 9.
Table 9. Hypotheses confirmation

Hypotheses

Standardized Path Coefficient

T.VALUE

Result

H1

0.209

13.960

Confirmation

H2

0.652

46.719

Confirmation

H3

0.260

19.716

Confirmation

H4

0.517

135.757

Confirmation

The relationship between the studied variables in each research hypothesis is tested based on a causal structure with the PLS partial least squares technique. In the general research model, drawn in the following figures, the measurement model (the relationship of each visible variable to the hidden variable) and the path model (the relationship of the hidden variables) are calculated. To measure the significance of the relationships, the t-statistic was calculated using the bootstrapping technique.

In the following, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show t-values of the paths of relationships between predictor variables, values of standard coefficients and prediction coefficients, t-values of the paths of relationships between predictor variables, and values of standard coefficients and prediction coefficients, respectively.

Figure 3. t-values of the paths of relationships between predictor variables
Figure 4. Values of standard coefficients and prediction coefficients
Figure 5. t-values of the paths of relationships between predictor variables
Figure 6. Values of standard coefficients and prediction coefficients

4. Discussion and Conclusion

Data collected from overseas residents of the historical city of Qingdao was compared to examine the mediating role residents' perceptions of tourism impacts play in shaping the relationships between influencing factors and support for tourism development. In doing so, this study combined SET and WTSFR to provide an overarching framework to better understand foreign residents' perceptions of tourism development and their support for it. As such, the findings correspond with results from similar previous studies, many of which have been conducted in different cultural settings. The validity and reliability of the projected model of the path relationships among factors influencing residents' perceptions and the mediating role of residents' perceptions of and support for tourism development were supported for most hypotheses. These results reinforce the propositions of SET and confirm the positive, significant effect of residents' perceptions on their support for tourism development (A​l​m​e​i​d​a​ ​G​a​r​c​í​a​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​6; A​n​d​e​r​e​c​k​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​0​5; H​a​l​l​ ​&​ ​P​a​g​e​,​ ​2​0​1​4; K​i​m​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​3; V​a​r​e​i​r​o​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​3). Prior studies argue that residents who perceive more positive tourism impacts will support tourism development, while residents who perceive less positive tourism impacts are less likely to support tourism development (N​u​n​k​o​o​ ​&​ ​R​a​m​k​i​s​s​o​o​n​,​ ​2​0​1​1; R​a​s​o​o​l​i​m​a​n​e​s​h​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​5; R​a​s​o​o​l​i​m​a​n​e​s​h​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​1​9; Y​a​z​d​a​n​i​ ​e​t​ ​a​l​.​,​ ​2​0​2​2). Therefore, the results of the current study are consistent with prior research, signifying the positive and significant effect of RP on SUP in Qingdao. Thus, the results contribute toward a better understanding of the exchange process identified by SET, as recognized across the tourism development discourse.

The data analysis showed that some community members are disinclined toward the effects of tourism. For example, their disturbances related to environmental impacts and some social and cultural effects are significant. The negative effects of tourism on the community cause a lower inclination in society to participate in tourism development programs. However, its positive effects result in increasing their support and reaching the goals of the projects. Regarding Qingdao City, it seems that the benefits from tourism have provided the required encouragement to participate in tourism development programs. The results related to correlation coefficients indicate a significant relationship between tourism's effects on the community and participation degree. In this paper, economic, social, and cultural factors are the most critical factors affecting community participation in tourism development programs. Knowing how tourism affects society and supporting community cooperation are essential to reinforcing the strengths and improving the weaknesses of tourism planning. To obtain this goal, it is necessary to communicate effectively between planners and the community to gain society's support. As mentioned in the introduction, the effects of tourism development differ in various societies. Therefore, the results obtained from this study can't be generalized to other societies with certainty. One of the biggest problems for this study was the unavailability of research on the effects of tourism development in China on foreign residents. This results in the lack of a criterion for comparing tourism development effects for a case model. This factor is effective in encouraging the participation of international society in tourism development programs. As a result, although the results of this study indicate a strong correlation between tourism development effects on the community and the degree of community participation in tourism development programs, to be certain of this issue and the factors that affect it requires more studies in the future.

This study aims to investigate the degree to which each variable positively or negatively affects the perceptions of foreign residents.

H1: The overall perception of the overseas residents in Qingdao regarding the tourism development in the city is positive.

H2: There is a strong link between tourist development's socio-cultural effects and how foreign residents perceive tourism development.

H3: There is a strong link between the economic consequences of tourist development and how foreign residents see tourism development.

H4: There is a significant association between the environmental impacts of tourism development and overseas residents' perceptions of tourism development.

Previous research looked at the impact of influencing variables on citizens' perceptions and support for tourist growth. To our knowledge, however, the mediating impact of residents' views remains under-explored. Few research studies compare the direct effects of influencing variables on tourist development support and their indirect implications through people's perceptions of tourism development. As a result, this is the study's main theoretical contribution. The findings demonstrated that when citizens' perceptions are used as a mediator, the direct impacts of influencing variables on support for tourism development are larger than their indirect effects. This theoretical discovery contradicts previously held beliefs by emphasizing the relevance of the direct effects of influencing variables on tourism development support. The investigation was undertaken online to cross-validate the data using the recently invented MGA approach, another noteworthy addition. The political, economic, and cultural existence of places outside the tourism context means that tourism destinations have a more comprehensive meaning potential than most other consumer products and meanings that are closely tied up with the present and historical relations between the country of origin of the tourist and that of the destination (T​h​e​r​k​e​l​s​e​n​,​ ​2​0​0​3). A tourist destination may be viewed as an amalgam of individual products and experiences that combine to form the total experience of the area visited (E​k​i​n​c​i​ ​&​ ​H​o​s​a​n​y​,​ ​2​0​0​6). Past research has demonstrated that the destination image has both cognitive and affective components (E​k​i​n​c​i​ ​&​ ​H​o​s​a​n​y​,​ ​2​0​0​6). Although destination images have been found to consist of both affective and cognitive components, past research has also shown a direct connection between a destination’s image and the trend of tourists recommending it through word of mouth (E​k​i​n​c​i​ ​&​ ​H​o​s​a​n​y​,​ ​2​0​0​6) and also a direct connection between the destination’s image and tourist’s expectations (M​i​d​d​l​e​t​o​n​,​ ​2​0​0​1). The first category, which mainly motivates the tourist option, influences the potential customers’ motivation. It consists of natural attractions, built attractions, cultural attractions, and social attractions (e.g., way of life and local habits, language, and social interactions) (M​i​d​d​l​e​t​o​n​,​ ​2​0​0​1). The second category, represented by the services and facilities available at the destination, encourages tourists to check in and enjoy the attractions. In this category, we can include: accommodation, restaurants, local transport (taxis, buses, bike rentals, and other facilities), services and infrastructure for practicing certain sports (skiing schools, navigation, golf clubs, and stadiums), shops, tourist agencies, beauty salons, and spas (M​i​d​d​l​e​t​o​n​,​ ​2​0​0​1). Ease of access determines, in most cases, the cost and speed for a tourist to reach a certain destination. In this third category, we include: general infrastructure (roads, parking places, airports, train stations, ports, and aqueducts), transport equipment (size, speed, and offer), operational factors (operated routes, service frequency, tariffs), and government regulation for transport (M​i​d​d​l​e​t​o​n​,​ ​2​0​0​1). The fourth category refers to the image and attitude tourists have concerning a tourist destination. Such factors are not necessarily connected with the previous tourist experience or any other objective arguments, but these factors are considered very powerful motivators in the tourism industry. Each destination has an image, but most times this is based on past events, and it doesn’t regard the present. This is why it is considered a very important destination marketing objective to sustain, demolish, or build images that influence potential customers’ perceptions and expectations (M​i​d​d​l​e​t​o​n​,​ ​2​0​0​1). The last category is the price a client has to pay. This determines which products and services will be chosen, but it is also influenced by other factors, including season and desired services. From an international products’ perspective, influencing factors are also exchange rates and transport methods (M​i​d​d​l​e​t​o​n​,​ ​2​0​0​1).

The image of Qingdao, as seen by current visitors and residents, was gathered through a questionnaire survey that required the rating of predetermined cognitive and affective attributes and content analysis of responses to questions about the various impacts of tourism on the lives of foreign city residents. These findings also support E​c​h​t​n​e​r​ ​&​ ​R​i​t​c​h​i​e​ ​(​1​9​9​1​) claim that the measuring methods used impact the capacity to capture distinct aspects of an image construct. Multiple methodologies (both structured and unstructured) should be used to measure the destination image. Rating scales may assess cognitive and emotive images to offer a standardized knowledge of Qingdao's image regarding the city's strengths and flaws. At the same time, free answers can highlight the aspects that respondents find particularly important.

4.1 Methodological Considerations Regarding Image Assessment

Tourism growth is usually regarded as being warmly received by foreign residents of Qingdao. This favorable perception may alter over time as tourism develops, since a larger number of visitors may cause more significant challenges. Because most respondents could not directly relate their difficulties in Qingdao to tourism, some common concerns in metropolitan areas, such as traffic congestion and rising prices, emerged; however, they were not seen as solely the result of tourism. Related expansion. Due to tourism development, foreign residents have not felt any incursion into local culture. This may be because Qingdao is such an international city with diverse cultures and nationalities. As a result, more research may be needed to determine if reactions to the characteristics addressed in this study remain constant or alter over time in response to increased tourism activities.

Researching and studying the impacts of tourism development on the residents of a tourism destination and inquiring about the residents’ ideas and opinions have long been practiced by tourism governments, destination development and management organizations, and academicians in order to learn how the lives of the people have been impacted by tourism development and find out better ways to further develop tourism while making sure that it is sustainable. Yet, most of these studies, by solely targeting the local residents of the tourism destinations, have mostly ignored the thoughts, ideas, and opinions of the foreign residents (residing in the same destination) regarding how their lives have been impacted by the development of tourism. Despite their smaller numbers and (most likely) temporary status as residents, the overseas residents of any given location are possibly already in contact with a considerable number of friends and relatives or even social media followers and viewers in their country of origin or beyond, and can, via word of mouth, have a direct and very effective role in promoting or demoting a tourism destination to the people outside of that location or country. Furthermore, the overseas residents of a tourism destination are more likely to have a better understanding of the interests and wants of the people of their own countries and what is appealing to them in that particular destination, and, therefore, the ideas and suggestions that they have can be crucial to the tourism destination development and management bodies that want to promote the destination and attract more (especially international) tourists to it while making sure that the whole process is as sustainable as possible. The city of Qingdao is a major tourism destination in the east of China. The public and private sectors, as well as the regional and provincial authorities, attribute a lot of importance to promoting it as an international city and further attracting more international tourism and businesses to it. Reaching out to and investigating how the current state of tourism has impacted the lives of its overseas residents, as well as what ideas, opinions, and suggestions they might have for the further tourism development of the city, can be a valuable step in planning the future development of the tourism of Qingdao in a more efficient and sustainable way. Future studies might use a sequential research strategy to guarantee that the properties acquired from projected pictures are evaluated as perceived image attributes. Because this study focuses on Qingdao, China, the findings can only be applied to the sample population. The findings, on the other hand, may benefit people who conduct studies in different settings and as sources for image comparison with other places. Other researchers may be able to utilize the methodology and survey instruments as a starting point.

Data Availability

The data used to support the research findings are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
Aaker, D. A. & Day, G. S. (1990). Marketing Research (4th ed.). Singapore: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
Almeida García, F., Peláez Fernández, M. Á., Balbuena Vazquez, A., & Cortes Macias, R. (2016). Residents’ perceptions of tourism development in Benalmádena (Spain). Tour. Manag., 54, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Andereck, K., Valentine, K., Knopf, R., & Vogt, C. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Ann. Tour. Res., 32(4), 1056–1076. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Badri, S. A. & Yarmohamadi, N. (2022). A game theory–based model for dental centers in a competitive market of dental tourism under government intervention. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 9(1), 78–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bagherzadeh Valami, H. & Raeinojehdehi, R. (2016). Ranking units in Data Envelopment Analysis with fuzzy data. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 30(5), 2505–2516. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Bansal, H. & Eiselt, H. A. (2004). Exploratory research of tourist motivations and planning. Tour. Manag., 25(3), 387–396. [Google Scholar]
Beard, J. G. & Ragheb, M. G. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. J. Leis. Res., 15(3), 219–228. [Google Scholar]
Bieger, T. & Laesser, C. (2002). Market segmentation by motivation: The case of Switzerland. J. Travel Res., 41(1), 68–76. [Google Scholar]
Boz, E., Gopinath, G., & Plagborg-Møller, M. (2017). Global Trade and the Dollar. National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Cha, S., McCleary, K. W., & Uysal, M. (1995). Travel motivations of Japanese overseas travelers: A factor-cluster segmentation approach. J. Travel Res., 34(1), 33–39. [Google Scholar]
Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Ind. Mark. Manag., 38(2), 152–158. [Google Scholar]
Cohen, E. (1972). Toward a sociology of international tourism. Soc. Res., 39(1), 164–182. [Google Scholar]
Crandall, R. & Slivken, K. (1980). Leisure attitudes and their management. In Leisure Attitudes and Their Management (pp. 261–284). [Google Scholar]
Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Ann. Tour. Res., 6(4), 408–424. [Google Scholar]
Cullinane, S. & Cullinane, K. (2003). Hong Kong city profile. Cities, 20(4), 279–288. [Google Scholar]
Cutter, S. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog. Hum. Geogr., 20, 529–539. [Google Scholar]
Dann, G. M. (1977). Anomie, ego-enhancement and tourism. Ann. Tour. Res., 4(4), 184–194. [Google Scholar]
Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural equation modeling with PLS. Tehran: Jahad Univ., 215(2), 224. [Google Scholar]
Dong, W. & Zhang, X. (2011). Urumqi. Cities, 28(1), 115–125. [Google Scholar]
Echtner, C. M. & Ritchie, J. B. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. J. Tour. Stud., 2(2), 2–12. [Google Scholar]
Ekinci, Y. & Hosany, S. (2006). Destination personality: An application of brand personality to tourism destinations. J. Travel Res., 45(2), 127–139. [Google Scholar]
Eyisi, A., Lee, D., & Trees, K. (2023). Local perceptions of tourism development and socio-cultural impacts in Nigeria. Tour. Plan. Dev., 20(4), 499–521. [Google Scholar]
Fodness, D. (1994). Measuring tourist motivation. Ann. Tour. Res., 21(3), 555–581. [Google Scholar]
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res., 18(3), 382–388. [Google Scholar]
Gajdosik, T., Gajdosikova, Z., & Strazanova, R. (2018). Residents perception of sustainable tourism destination development: A destination governance issue. Glob. Bus. Financ. Rev., 23(1), 24–35. [Google Scholar]
Gitelson, R. & Kerstetter, D. (1995). The influence of friends and relatives in travel decision-making. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 3(3), 59–68. [Google Scholar]
Gray, H. P. (1970). International travel--international trade. Lexington, MA, Heath Lexington Books. [Google Scholar]
Guillaumont, P. (2010). Assessing the economic vulnerability of small island developing states and the least developed countries. J. Dev. Stud., 46, 828–854. [Google Scholar]
Hall, C. M. & Page, S. J. (2014). The Geography Of Tourism and Recreation: Environment, Place and Space. Oxford, UK: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Hall, T. E. (2001). Opinion filter in recreation research: The effect of including “No opinion” and “Not notice” response categories in questionnaires. Tour. Anal., 6(1), 15. [Google Scholar]
Han, S. S. & Wang, Y. (2001). Chongqing. Cities, 18(2), 115–125. [Google Scholar]
Han, S. S. & Wu, X. (2004). Wuhan. Cities, 21(4), 349–362. [Google Scholar]
Hartman, S. (2023). Destination governance in times of change: A complex adaptive systems perspective to improve tourism destination development. J. Tour. Futures, 9(2), 267–278. [Google Scholar]
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar]
Hockenbury, D. H. (2009). Study Guide for Psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating Model Fit. [Google Scholar]
Huang, C., Lin, F., Chu, D., Wang, L., Liao, J., & Wu, J. (2021). Spatiotemporal evolution and trend prediction of tourism economic vulnerability in China’s major tourist cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10, 644. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Manag. J., 20(2), 195–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Jamrozy, U. & Uysal, M. (1994). Travel motivation variations of overseas German visitors. Glob. Tour. Behav., 135–160. [Google Scholar]
Jang, S., Morrison, A. M., & O’Leary, J. T. (2004). The tourism efficient frontier: An approach to selecting the most efficient travel segment mixes. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 16(4), 33–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Jurowski, C., Uysal, M., & Noe, F. P. (1993). US Virgin Islands National Park: A factor-cluster segmentation study. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 1(4), 3–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents? Tour. Manag., 36, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Kleiven, J. (1998). Skalaer for Måling av Aktivitets- og Motivm⊘nstre i en norsk lokalbefolknings ferie og fritid (Working paper no. 77/1988). Lillehammer: Lillehammer College. [Google Scholar]
Lee, G., O’Leary, J. T., Lee, S. H., & Morrison, A. (2002). Comparison and contrast of push and pull motivational effects on trip behavior: An application of a multinomial logistic regression model. Tour. Anal., 7(2), 89–104. [Google Scholar]
Leitmann, J. (1994). Tianjin. Cities, 11(5), 275–276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Li, F. (2013). Study of vulnerability measurement of Chinese tourism economic system: Based on SPA. Tour. Sci., 27, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
Liang, Z. & Xie, L. (2011). On the vulnerability of economic system of traditional tourism cities: A case from Guilin. Tour. Trib., 26, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
Mayo, E. J. & Jarvis, L. P. (1981). Understanding the theme park visitor: A psychological perspective. Ann. Tour. Res., 8(2), 269–274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Middleton, V. (2001). The importance of micro-businesses in European tourism. Rural Tour. Recreat.: Princ. Pract., 197–201. [Google Scholar]
Mou, N., Zheng, Y., Makkonen, T., Yang, T., Tang, J. J., & Song, Y. (2020). Tourists’ digital footprint: The spatial patterns of tourist flows in Qingdao, China. Tour. Manag., 81, 104151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Ng, M. K. (2003). Shenzhen. Cities, 20(6), 429–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Nojehdehi, R. R., Valami, H., & Najafi, S. E. (2011). Evaluating the membership degree of the DMU’s related to the fuzzy frontier in DEA with fuzzy input-output levels: A geometrical approach. Trends Adv. Sci. Eng., 4, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
Nunkoo, R. & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Residents’ satisfaction with community attributes and support for tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Res., 35(2), 171–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Oh, H. C., Uysal, M., & Weaver, P. A. (1995). Product bundles and market segments based on travel motivations: A canonical correlation approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 14(2), 123–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Plog, S. C. (1974). Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. Cornell Hotel Restaur. Adm. Q., 14(4), 55–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Polsky, C., Neff, R., & Yarnal, B. (2007). Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Glob. Environ. Chang., 17, 472–485. [Google Scholar]
Pourmorshed, S. S., Sajadi, S. M., & Sadeghian Esfahani, S. (2022). Eco-tourism residences in Iran: A multiple case study research with a creative tourism approach. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 9(4), 427–441. [Google Scholar]
Qin, F. & Chen, G. (2022). Vulnerability of tourist cities’ economic systems amid the COVID-19 pandemic: System characteristics and formation mechanisms—A case study of 46 major tourist cities in China. Sustain., 14(5), 2661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Rasinojehdehi, R. & Valami, H. B. (2023). A comprehensive neutrosophic model for evaluating the efficiency of airlines based on the SBM model of network DEA. Decis. Mak.: Appl. Manag. Eng., 6(2), 880–906. [Google Scholar]
Rasoolimanesh, S., Jaafar, M., Kock, N., & Ramayah, T. (2015). A revised framework of social exchange theory to investigate the factors influencing residents’ perceptions. Tour. Manag. Perspect., 16, 335–345. [Google Scholar]
Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Noor, S. M., & Jaafar, M. (2019). Positive and negative perceptions of residents toward tourism development: Formative or reflective. In Quantitative Tourism Research in Asia: Current Status and Future Directions. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
Ryan, C. & Glendon, I. (1998). Application of leisure motivation scale to tourism. Ann. Tour. Res., 25(1), 169–184. [Google Scholar]
Šegota, T., Mihalič, T., & Perdue, R. R. (2024). Resident perceptions and responses to tourism: Individual vs community level impacts. J. Sustain. Tour., 32(2), 340–363. [Google Scholar]
Šerić, M., Došen, Đ. O., & Mikulić, J. (2023). Antecedents and moderators of positive word of mouth communication among tourist destination residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr. Issues Tour., 26(2), 224–241. [Google Scholar]
Sreya, P. S., Parayil, C., Aswathy, N., Bonny, B. P., Aiswarya, T. P., & Nameer, P. O. (2021). Economic vulnerability of small-scale coastal households to extreme weather events in Southern India. Mar. Policy, 131, 104608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tang, U. W. & Sheng, N. (2009). Macao. Cities, 26(4), 220–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Therkelsen, A. (2003). Imagining places: Image formation of tourists and its consequences for destination promotion. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour., 3(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Turnbull, D. R. & Uysal, M. (1995). An exploratory study of German visitors to the Caribbean: Push and pull motivations. J. Travel Tour. Mark., 4(2), 85–92. [Google Scholar]
Uysal, M., McGehee, N. G., & Loker-Murphy, L. (1996). The Australian international pleasure travel market: Motivations from a gendered perspective. 7(1), 45–57. [Google Scholar]
Vareiro, L., Remoaldo, P., & Cadima Ribeiro, J. (2013). Residents’ perceptions of tourism impacts in Guimarães (Portugal): A cluster analysis. Curr. Issues Tour., 16(6), 535–551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wang, M., Liu, S., & Wang, C. (2023). Spatial distribution and influencing factors of high-quality tourist attractions in Shandong Province, China. PLoS One, 18(7), e0288472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wang, P., Qiao, W., Wang, Y., Cao, S., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Urban drought vulnerability assessment-A framework to integrate socio-economic, physical, and policy index in a vulnerability contribution analysis. Sustain. Cities Soc., 54, 102004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wang, Y., Li, G., & Bai, X. (2005). A residential survey on urban tourism impacts in Harbin. China Tour. Res., 1(1), 116–129. [Google Scholar]
Wang, Y. P. & Hague, C. (1995). Baoji. Cities, 12(5), 361–368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Wu, P., Han, Y., & Tian, M. (2015). The measurement and comparative study of carbon dioxide emissions from tourism in typical provinces in China. Acta Ecol. Sin., 35(6), 184–190. [Google Scholar]
Xu, J. & Yeh, A. G. (2003). Guangzhou. Cities, 20(5), 361–374. [Google Scholar]
Yazdani, R., Taghipourian, M. J., Pourpasha, M. M., & Hosseini, S. S. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting brand strengthening drivers in e-commerce: A study of the Iranian tourism industry. J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., 9(4), 374–383. [Google Scholar]
Yin, P., Liu, S., & Dan, P. (2017). Analysis on the vulnerability and obstacle indicators in island-type tourism destination: Take Zhoushan city for example. Econ. Geogr., 37, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
Yuan, S. & McDonald, C. (1990). Motivational determinates of international pleasure time. J. Travel Res., 29(1), 42–44. [Google Scholar]

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
Abdinematabad, S., Ebadikhah, R., Pourabdollah, M., & Raeinojehdehi, R. (2024). Perceptions of Overseas Residents on Tourism Development in Qingdao: An Impact Analysis. Tour. Spectr. Div. Dyn., 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.56578/tsdd010101
S. Abdinematabad, R. Ebadikhah, M. Pourabdollah, and R. Raeinojehdehi, "Perceptions of Overseas Residents on Tourism Development in Qingdao: An Impact Analysis," Tour. Spectr. Div. Dyn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2024. https://doi.org/10.56578/tsdd010101
@research-article{Abdinematabad2024PerceptionsOO,
title={Perceptions of Overseas Residents on Tourism Development in Qingdao: An Impact Analysis},
author={Sahand Abdinematabad and Roghaye Ebadikhah and Mehdi Pourabdollah and Reza Raeinojehdehi},
journal={TourismSpectrum: Diversity & Dynamics},
year={2024},
page={1-15},
doi={https://doi.org/10.56578/tsdd010101}
}
Sahand Abdinematabad, et al. "Perceptions of Overseas Residents on Tourism Development in Qingdao: An Impact Analysis." TourismSpectrum: Diversity & Dynamics, v 1, pp 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/tsdd010101
Sahand Abdinematabad, Roghaye Ebadikhah, Mehdi Pourabdollah and Reza Raeinojehdehi. "Perceptions of Overseas Residents on Tourism Development in Qingdao: An Impact Analysis." TourismSpectrum: Diversity & Dynamics, 1, (2024): 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/tsdd010101
cc
©2024 by the author(s). Published by Acadlore Publishing Services Limited, Hong Kong. This article is available for free download and can be reused and cited, provided that the original published version is credited, under the CC BY 4.0 license.